Ok, considering all of this, I guess it would still be within the scope
of Angstrom to work on a daemon using HAL/D-Bus for Angstrom.
Since the deadline is rapidly approaching, I'll put all ideas that have
been discussed on the wiki, and someone with more insight/power than I
can decide if the
Jacob Thebault-Spieker wrote:
> So, if I understand correctly, HAL could be used to integrate with
> D-Bus? Or are the two things exclusive?
No, D-Bus is the signalling technology, providing a way to send signals,
broadcasts etc. between applications.
HAL is a Hardware Abstraction Layer which tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philip Balister schreef:
|
|
| Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
|
|>
|> I'm willing to mentor one project, but I'm not available as general
|> organizer.
|>
|
| I'd be willing to do the general organization (submit the app etc). I'm
| not sure who to appl
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
I'm willing to mentor one project, but I'm not available as general organizer.
I'd be willing to do the general organization (submit the app etc). I'm
not sure who to apply as, but we have plenty of projects we could apply
this to. (OE, Angstrom). What we ne
So, if I understand correctly, HAL could be used to integrate with
D-Bus? Or are the two things exclusive?
If it's exclusive, why would we choose one or the other? It seems to
me(from my very cursory understanding) is that HAL is a more complete
solution, and further implemented in the desktop
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2008 19:28:57 Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> > It needs general discussion before starting to implement:
> > - Should it be based on hal? And should be hal the technology for OE to
> > go?
> > If yes:
> > - Should OE use upstream hal?
> > -
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 19:28:57 Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> It needs general discussion before starting to implement:
> - Should it be based on hal? And should be hal the technology for OE to
> go?
> If yes:
> - Should OE use upstream hal?
> - Should OE use cut-down hal version?
> - Sho
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:54:45 -0600
Jacob Thebault-Spieker wrote:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> > Jake Thebault-Spieker wrote:
> >> I've been working on coming up with ideas that Angstrom could use
> >> for it's Google Summer of Code application. These are the ideas I
> >> came up with, some of which
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Jake Thebault-Spieker wrote:
I've been working on coming up with ideas that Angstrom could use for it's
Google Summer of Code application. These are the ideas I came up with, some
of which were suggested by some people in the community(I think mickeyl,
possibly others as
Jake Thebault-Spieker wrote:
> I've been working on coming up with ideas that Angstrom could use for it's
> Google Summer of Code application. These are the ideas I came up with, some
> of which were suggested by some people in the community(I think mickeyl,
> possibly others as well).
>
> The ide
I sent a preliminary message to the OE list, and it didn't seem to be
very good feedback. From what I saw, it didn't sound like anyone on the
OE side of things was that interested in having a GSoC project...
Perhaps because there aren't that many 'googly' type of projects that OE
needs done.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jake Thebault-Spieker schreef:
| I've been working on coming up with ideas that Angstrom could use for it's
| Google Summer of Code application. These are the ideas I came up with,
some
| of which were suggested by some people in the community(I think
I've been working on coming up with ideas that Angstrom could use for it's
Google Summer of Code application. These are the ideas I came up with, some
of which were suggested by some people in the community(I think mickeyl,
possibly others as well).
The ideas are:
First time install wizard/config
13 matches
Mail list logo
