[snip]
Just beware that packagenames=* will NOT work, you need to
specify part of
the packag name.
I have actually been using packagenames=*.* which seems to work quite well
too.
--
knut
This is a user question, thus I've answered it there.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Carlo DeRossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where do I find the DTD (or Schema) for validating a BuildFile.xml ?
http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/faq.html#dtd
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 22:25 pm, Diane Holt wrote:
--- stephan beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of Cvs's problems is that it also doesn't give a non-0 error code on
some commands which (IMO), should. For example, 'cvs status foo' does
not fail if foo does not exist (it should, IMO),
- Original Message -
From: Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: ftp-ing only new files
- Original Message -
From: Denis McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hey,
Does anyone know if it is possible to have a build file that could finish up actually
'tail -f ' -ing a unix log? I'm running the build from a windows machine that
distributes code and restarts a webserver on a remote unix machine. I would like to
enable the user to actually see the
On Wednesday 27 March 2002 04:32 am, Adam Murdoch wrote:
-Original Message-
Unfortunately, to solve your particular problem, I think you will have to
write your own mapper implementation. It's not particularaly hard -
implement FileNameMapper to do the appropriate conversion,
--- stephan beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 22:25 pm, Diane Holt wrote:
But 'cvs log' does give you a return code of 1. And 'cvs diff'
returns 0 for no diffs, 1 for diffs. So it's all doable using
currently available Ant tasks.
Nope. How does the user get the
Here Here,
I consider myself a background newbie user of Ant. Not overly active in the forums,
and only asking questions for which I have neither the time or the knowledge to
resolve myself. I have made the following observations from monitoring the Ant forum.
High volume of queries
High
-Original Message-
From: Diane Holt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[...]
The ant-user list is a place where people can ask for
solutions to their
problems, and hopefully we can offer them some. Constantly poohpoohing
those proffered solutions that use what's already available
seems
Most of our build.xml looks like this:
target name=CalcExt depends=edlohn-enhanced,eurodata,PayrollExt
antcall target=buildSubDir
param name=subDir value=CalcExt/
param name=classpath
On Wednesday 27 March 2002 12:41 pm, Stephane Bailliez wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Diane Holt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[...]
The ant-user list is a place where people can ask for
solutions to their
problems, and hopefully we can offer them some. Constantly poohpoohing
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Bob Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there's interest,
Yes.
we can return that change to the group
Please do.
(if someone will kindly point me to the right instruction page
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html
scroll down to Patches.
Stefan
--
To
--- Denis McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The behaviour seems funny; each time I ftp the files across to my AIX
machine, they are given as a new timestamp the time at which they were
ftp'd. It seems that with this behaviour the files will all be ftp'd
across each time, because the ftp
- Original Message -
From: Scott Ellsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also like NoBannerLogger, but in the ant wrapper version in cvs you
can specify ANT_ARGS environment variable and the wrapper will pass
that to ant,
so that I have:
ANT_ARGS=-logger
Hi,
in Ant's bootstrap script we have some special cases for this
particular JDK as it has some strange directory layout (different from
Sun's, that is). In particular javac is in $JAVA_HOME/sh and java in
$JAVA_HOME/jre/sh.
Can anybody tell me where javadoc and rmic are in this layout? I
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Gordon Tyler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Steve Loughran suggested, perhaps a cancelBuild method could be
added to Project which sets a flag and various points in the build
code path check that flag and throw a BuildCancelledException if it
is set.
Sounds OK, but like
Hi Joseph,
I'm mixing comments to both parts as I've read them both just today.
Part 1:
===
(1) includes=**/*.java is not necessary in javac. Ant is even smarter
than you think, javac already does exactly this. 8-)
(2) I don't understand the comment regarding paths and javadoc
vs. javac.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:12 PM
One problem with this is that Tasks themselves would have to be modified
to
also check this flag so that long-running Tasks don't prevent the build
from
being cancelled until
I've been adding a get task to my build, for a 26MB file, over http. It's
taking a while, and wanted to provide feedback using the verbose=true
attribute. I do get the dots for each 100KB of data, but only all at once
when it's done, which kind of defeats the purpose of being verbose. Is that
[snip]
Just beware that packagenames=* will NOT work, you need to
specify part of
the packag name.
I have actually been using packagenames=*.* which seems to work quite
well
too.
I just tried that it works like a charm. Maybe this should be included in
the docs...
Anyway,
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi Joseph,
I'm mixing comments to both parts as I've read them both just today.
Part 1:
===
(1) includes=**/*.java is not necessary in javac. Ant is even smarter
than you think, javac already does exactly this. 8-)
actually, it doesn't, or it didn't
--- Joseph Shelby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
(1) includes=**/*.java is not necessary in javac. Ant is even
smarter than you think, javac already does exactly this. 8-)
actually, it doesn't, or it didn't anyways.
It always has for me (all the way back to release 1.2).
--- stephan beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't say it's all doable using the Cvs task -- I said it's all
doable using currently available Ant tasks.
You cannot get the error code of a run program using any current (1.4x)
Ant task without hacking that task. If i am wrong, please show
I am compiling the jsps and that is how these directories are created with
an _ infront of all the directories. Infact, I don't want the _. I
don't know a way to tell the compiler not create the _ infront of the
directories or it would be even better, if the java and class files from
jsps can be
On 27 Mar 2002 14:19:08 +0100
Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP ... JDK 1.2.2 on AIX ...]
Can anybody tell me where javadoc and rmic are in this layout? I
assume they are in $JAVA_HOME/sh as these are JDK commands and not
part of the JRE, but who knows.
Both are in
We're using Ant1.5 alpha and seeing a strange problem.
If I do ant clean all test I get an error message saying:
build.xml:143: You must specify the jar file to create!
The strange part is that if I do:
ant clean
ant all
ant test
It seems like those two ways of building should be equivalent,
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am compiling the jsps and that is how these directories are created
with an _ infront of all the directories. Infact, I don't want
the _. I don't know a way to tell the compiler not create the _
infront of the directories or it would be even better, if the java
Charles,
This issue is being discussed right now on ant-dev. A bug has been
introduced in Zip/Jar.
Conor
-Original Message-
From: Charles Brunson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 28 March 2002 10:14 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: wierd problem with ant1.5alpha
We're
looks like something is buffering the output.
The task uses System.out.print(.); ... maybe a change to ant (like
sticking our own output stream to system.out) has broken this.
The original design bypassed the log completely see, and it looks like it
has crept back in.
why not file a bug
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Joseph Shelby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
(1) includes=**/*.java is not necessary in javac. Ant is even
smarter than you think, javac already does exactly this. 8-)
actually, it doesn't, or it didn't anyways.
The only version that showed even
30 matches
Mail list logo
