RE: Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-21 Thread SimonRichardson2
Eric Thanks for your reply. And the file is updated here, I'm assuming. Why do you need script to read a property file? I guess to increment it. How about using propertyfile to do this instead? The problem is that the version number is not held in a property file (although it could

Re: Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-21 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 04:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that the version number is not held in a property file (although it could be). This is one of the anthill 'features' - anthill will maintain a version file, containing a version number: prefixbuildNopostfix

RE: Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-21 Thread SimonRichardson2
Eric I suspect Maciej is curious, as am I, why you are doing some tricks with this file instead of letting Anthill itself handle it. The 'tricks' are to enable us to build from the command line in addition to using anthill. We still have a requirement to build by command line because anthill

Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-20 Thread SimonRichardson2
Is there a way of getting a reference to the current project in JavaScript script without knowing the project name first? The question has been asked before - but that's where the thread ended. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-userm=98289502701027w=2 Regards Simon Simon Richardson

RE: Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-20 Thread SimonRichardson2
: Richardson, Simon (Treasury) Sent: 20 January 2003 12:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reference to the Current Project Is there a way of getting a reference to the current project in JavaScript script without knowing the project name first? The question has been asked before

Re: Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 07:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way of getting a reference to the current project in JavaScript script without knowing the project name first? Yes - there is the object 'project' that I added to the script task that is the Project object

Re: Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 08:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My problem (***) is that I would like to 'antcall' some other target (that contains my javascript) and in so doing set a property. However I find that on returning from my antcall the property remains unset. Reading the

RE: Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-20 Thread SimonRichardson2
Subject: Re: Reference to the Current Project On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 08:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My problem (***) is that I would like to 'antcall' some other target (that contains my javascript) and in so doing set a property. However I find

Re: Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 09:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guessed as much - I've used echo to create the property file - is there an alternative way? Not as a general solution. But perhaps what you're trying to do is something that doesn't necessarily need properties being passed

RE: Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-20 Thread SimonRichardson2
I've personally never had a build scenario that required script or for properties to be passed back up, so its hard for me to identify. Could you describe your situation in more detail? I'm trying to emulate the behaviour of anthill (certain anthill/PVCS limitations have forced this on us)

Re: Reference to the Current Project

2003-01-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 09:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to emulate the behaviour of anthill (certain anthill/PVCS limitations have forced this on us) which maintains a version file. The script merely opens a file and creates properties for an oldVersion and newVersion.