On Fri 10/May/2024 13:57:44 +0200 Nick Hilliard wrote:
Serge,
there's been extensive debate on AAWG over the years about the principles
behind your additional suggestions below, but very little consensus. If
sanctioning is added to the charter of a new security-wg, this lack of
consensus is l
Serge
It’s not a matter of “comfort zones” – which Nick explained quite articulately
RIPE currently does not have the power to do a lot of things. The WG cannot
magically change that.
If you look at the current “debate” raging on the main members’ list, people
are arguing over a potential 50 e
Hi Michele
RIPE currently does not have the power to do a lot of things. The WG
cannot magically change that.
This is the old merry go round.
Maybe RIPE NCC needs to change certain things, or it will be changed for
them. The WG could provide guidance and suggest possible avenues where
RIP
RIPE NCC doesn’t really need member input or consensus to change a lot of this.
Certainly not in tightening or enforcing due diligence procedures rather than
charging 50 euro an ASN
—srs
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Serge Droz
via anti-abuse-wg
Sent: Mond
Suresh
It might be helpful to discuss this with them. I’m sure there are *some* things
that they could do without putting it to the members, but there’s a lot of
things that would need member agreement in order to change.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Col
That's fine. The WG can make suggestions, RIPE NCC considers this, and
if necessary asks the members, possibly explaining, or asking the WG to
explain why the change makes sense. Most people are sensible.
I don't see where there is a problem.
Best
Serge
On 13.05.24 16:11, Michele Neylon - Bla
