Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

We have had 2017-02, which is basically the same as yours 2019-04, except the validation will be done 2x more often. But the abuse-c validation does work. What's the problem then? -- Sergey > On Nov 1, 2023, at 05:10, jordi.palet--- via anti-abuse-wg > wrote: > >

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] AS16019, vodafone.cz == idiots

ebsite is down for almost two years and this diagnostics leads to nowhere. If someone is running a mail relay, then now is a good time to check its responses. -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov > On 12 Dec 2020, at 11:36, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Some days I am inclined to wo

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Spam from provider Timeweb/Russia AS9123 - and they just ignore me

Hi Martin, Why did you set "p=none" in your DMARC policy? Why not reject or quarantine? -- Sergey Monday, May 25, 2020, 4:09:14 PM, you wrote: > Hey everyone, > I have a conflict with a provider from Russia "Timeweb" AS9123. > It seems to be hosting a customer w

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Dear Jordi, > There are existing procedures for that in extreme cases. I think it's now obvious that existing procedures does not work. -- Sergey Friday, May 8, 2020, 1:20:45 PM, you wrote: JPMvaaw> However, I fully understand that the community prefer to do things in diff

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Report: Law Enforcement Agency Requests 2019

Dear Maria, Thank you for this report. I think it's better to explain abbreviations like 'MLAT' as I google it and it wasn't too easy to find the meaning without RIPE NCC website. PS. MLAT stands for 'mutual legal assistance treaties' -- Sergey > On 25

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] An arrest in Russia

tan (2018-2019) the NCC decided not to make any statements in the court and didn't revert the transaction until the Supreme court made its decision. The unpredictability of the NCC's actions don't make the members happy. -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] An arrest in Russia

policy isn't applied to all members in an equal manner? Thank you and have a happy holidays. -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov > On 31 Dec 2019, at 09:28, Marco Schmidt wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > We would like to provide some clarification on this case. > > E

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 Review Phase (Resource Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)

Support the withdrawal. -- Sergey Thursday, September 5, 2019, 6:31:28 PM, you wrote: >> I'd like to suggest to the chairs that this proposal be formally >> dropped. RB> please RB> randy

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking

Dear group members from Portugal stated your support for 2019-03, Can you please provide some more arguments than your humble "+1" statement? This is a working group, not a voting. Please. -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov > On 29 Mar 2019, at 18:33, Vitor Leitao wrote: > &

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)

Hello community, I strongly oppose to this proposal. The proposal gives a power for misuse to the RIR and does not protect members against setup. I believe this policy have nothing to do in RIPE. It's better to issue it as a BCP document or an informational RFC. -- Sergey Tuesday, Mar

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Report: Law Enforcement Agency Requests 2017

Dear Athina, Thank you for this report. Do I understand correctly that LEAs aren't trying to contact RIPE NCC over the phone or email, or you're just counting the requests that were sent in paper form? -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov > On 27 Feb 2018, at 20:50, Athina Fra

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 New Policy Proposal (Regular abuse-c Validation)

to deal with not cooperative members/PI holders/Legacy holders? I don't see anything in the proposal text. Is there any grounds for terminating membership and/or deregistering resources? -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov Thursday, September 7, 2017, 1:59:07 PM, you wrote: MS> Dear co

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Ecatel Network (Quasi Networks)

I say 'can', and not 'will' :) On 07/21/17 13:07, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: What, you haven’t heard the “we are not the internet police” refrain yet, eh? :) *From: *anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Sergey *Date: *Friday, 21 July 2017 at 3:28 PM *To: *"anti-abu

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Ecatel Network (Quasi Networks)

Hi, It seems to be a really long story and it's strange they're not listed for instance in Spamhaus DROP. I think this can only be resolved by RIPE NCC because both of its upstreams (AS3216 and AS12714) are huge Russian transit ISPs which would most likely be reluctant or maybe even resistan

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: RBL policy

There is no such country as 'the republic cyberbunker'. On 01/30/17 14:26, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker wrote: the republic cyberbunker nor the countries in which the customers operate have laws against viagra. too bad for the uk and their spamhaus. On 30 ينا, 2017 ص 11:

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: RBL policy

Please ban this person for insults and obscene language. There should be no place for this kind of behavior in the RIPE's mailing list. Thanks. On 01/30/17 13:53, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker wrote: Forwarded Message Subject:Re: [anti-abuse-wg] RBL policy

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: RBL policy

And you earn money on those who send offers for viagra. Let's talk turkey. On 01/30/17 14:00, HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker wrote: let's make one thing absolutely clear: if your 1960s instant messenger of choice (smtp) doesn't have a friends list, therefore is full of strangers sending y

[anti-abuse-wg] Host Europe GmbH AS8972 - seems to be fully rogue

Hello, First of all, I'm pretty sure nobody cares. However, I believe it's my obligation (at the very least) to report on massive abuse operation which I notice. I receive tons of spam e-mails from Russian or Ukrainian spammers sent from this allegedly "one of Europe's leading hosting provid

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Agenda - AA-WG RIPE73

Andre, that your cow is a donkey is purely your problem, not of the others subscribed to the mailing list. On 10/04/16 15:49, ox wrote: my cow is a donkey -- Kind regards, CTO at *Foton Telecom CJSC* Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99 AS42861 on PeeringDB , Qrator

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Charter

eliberately withhold what are >in >fact public governmental records and documents. Should the RIPE NCC >legal >staff continue to do so, then I believe that action will call into >question >the legal staff's true motivations with respect to this matter. Thus, >I >reiterat

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse

Brilliant. Thank you emphasizing this very simple point that others on the list pretend to behave as if they don't understand it. On 08/17/16 13:31, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: 3) Even RIPE NCC legal staff recognize that it would be the height of silly absurdity for them to call

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse

No evidence? Belize-based company's entry in RIPE DB is okay? 17 августа 2016 г. 0:16:00 GMT+03:00, "Sascha Luck [ml]" пишет: >I have a question for the Chair: > >Is it the purpose of this WG to be a forum for repeated, tedious, >longwinded and and libellous accusations that have heretofore not

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse

That's easy. The analogy is weak. Don't mess the Internet with real world things. The Internet has been self-regulated since its birth. Otherwise we'd have govts and not RIRs controlling the number resources. And I hear it all the time that it's specifically RIPE's problem of dealing with rogue

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Definition of Abuse

Are you *really* discussing what is abuse instead of dealing with it? Yes, that is really gonna turn into a stand-up comics... On 08/16/16 16:08, ox wrote: On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:38:49 +0200 David Hilario wrote: And when it comes to the definition discussed in this thread: "The non sa

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] VERIFIED[.]IS

Hi again, Ron! First of all thank you for all your contributions to this list - I personally (as I stated before) use to null-route prefixes you report. I don't intend to recommend this sort of policy to everyone - this is just my company's routing policy. Some others (even large backbones)

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!

It's simple. This simply has no place on the public Internet. A good idea is at the very least to null-route this IP space. On 08/09/16 15:13, an...@ox.co.za wrote: So, what you are saying is that if someone places some content on a website - that seems to be criminal or maybe may be criminal

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Russian carding... no, Islandic carding... no Belizian carding!

Are you blind, Andre? Okay, I'll cite the website rfg has pointed at for you then: > Hacking services > Email marketing - SPAM (the Russian text says it clearly: "spam sending services") > Malware & Coding > Sell CC & DUMPs, Enroll, Bank accounts, DOB+SSN That is okay, you think? I don'

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] AS201133

In a more accurate away: because they evade taxes and are ignorant enough not to go to LACNIC to get their AS numbers. On 07/01/16 15:47, Sergey wrote: You're kind of like blind now. It's because they evade taxes. No other reason. On 07/01/16 15:12, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Ju

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] AS201133

You're kind of like blind now. It's because they evade taxes. No other reason. On 07/01/16 15:12, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Jun 30, "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: And conversely, why did RIPE, and/or any of its LIRs, deem it appropriate to grant one of RIPE's limited supply of AS numbers to a sel

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] AS201133

It's all same for RIPE 203557 185.29.11.137 which you also mentioned in your listing. On 06/30/16 11:35, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: In message , =?UTF-8?B?QmVuZ3QgR8O2cmTDqW4=?= wrote: Den 2016-06-30 kl. 03:03, skrev Ronald F. Guilmette: In short, why didn't this self-identified *Belizian

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] how many of you received following email

Oh yes. It’s annoying. Almost every day. :( -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov > On 24 May 2015, at 21:09, Lu Heng wrote: > > This is gettingawaked: > > > > subject:[ncc-announce] [news] IPv4 address policy > > > > Hello. > > As you know,