> On May 17, 2019, at 12:40, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Hi all,
>
> As I read the proposal cutting off bogus LIRs seems to be the goal rather
> than cutting off a legitimate but careless player. There seem to be quite a
> few such given the coming wg meeting has a preso on just this to
Carlos
Friaças via anti-abuse-wg
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 3:08 PM
To: Nick Hilliard
Cc: Shane Kerr; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
On Fri, 17 May 2019, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Shane Kerr wrote on 17/05/2019 08:45:
>> All I can sa
On Fri, 17 May 2019, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Shane Kerr wrote on 17/05/2019 08:45:
All I can say is that the law is stupid then, and it SHOULD allow the
proposed policy. ?
fundamentally, it shouldn't. Proportionality is a cornerstone of most legal
systems - if you don't have proportionality,
Shane Kerr wrote on 17/05/2019 08:45:
All I can say is that the law is stupid then, and it SHOULD allow the
proposed policy. 😉
fundamentally, it shouldn't. Proportionality is a cornerstone of most
legal systems - if you don't have proportionality, you end up with
tyranny. The idea of threat
Alex,
On 17/05/2019 09.15, Shane Kerr wrote:
I don't think we need to be amateur lawyers for this or any other proposal.
I have been informed that you are an actual lawyer and not an amateur
one. Color me embarrassed!
My sincere apologies.
All I can say is that the law is stupid then, and
