On Fri, 17 May 2019, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Shane Kerr wrote on 17/05/2019 08:45:
All I can say is that the law is stupid then, and it SHOULD allow the
proposed policy. ?
fundamentally, it shouldn't. Proportionality is a cornerstone of most legal
systems - if you don't have proportionality, you end up with tyranny. The
idea of threatening to cut off a LIR because they haven't updated an abuse
contact is completely disproportionate to the scale of the policy infraction.
Hi,
It's probably not "haven't updated" but instead "haven't created".
Ideally this would also cover cases where company X deliberately inserts
an e-mail address from someone which has nothing to do with the numbering
resource... at least the legitimate owner of such mailbox should be able
to resort to someone (hopefully not a court!) to have that corrected in
the registry.......
We had that with our postal address from an ARIN member some years ago. :/
Carlos
Nick
