Re: [AOLSERVER] My 'memory leak'

2005-01-15 Thread Bas Scheffers
Right, there seems to be a bug with this default value then. Without any fastpath directives, memory grows and grows. Fastpath set to 1MB: nsd starts at ~4MB, grows to about 6MB. Perfect. Fastpath set to 5MB: nsd starts at ~4MB, grows to 10MB. Just like it should. This is both with the 4.0.1 I s

Re: [AOLSERVER] My 'memory leak'

2005-01-15 Thread Dossy Shiobara
On 2005.01.15, Bas Scheffers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, there seems to be a bug with this default value then. Without any > fastpath directives, memory grows and grows. > > Fastpath set to 1MB: > nsd starts at ~4MB, grows to about 6MB. Perfect. > > Fastpath set to 5MB: > nsd starts at ~4MB

Re: [AOLSERVER] Grr! Stupid mistake when doing previous mem. leak tests.

2005-01-15 Thread Janine Sisk
On Jan 14, 2005, at 10:16 PM, Dossy Shiobara wrote: SO, this begs the question: The people who are reporting memory leaks, do you have "connsperthread" set to anything in your config files? Nope, not me. I will do some comparison testing between 3.3 and 4.0.8, if that will be useful information.

Re: [AOLSERVER] Grr! Stupid mistake when doing previous mem. leak tests.

2005-01-15 Thread Dossy Shiobara
On 2005.01.15, Janine Sisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 14, 2005, at 10:16 PM, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > > >SO, this begs the question: The people who are reporting memory leaks, > >do you have "connsperthread" set to anything in your config files? > > Nope, not me. OK, at least that's ruled

[AOLSERVER] Re: [AOLSERVER] memory leak in 4.0.9?  (Long message.)

2005-01-15 Thread Jim Davidson
In a message dated 1/14/05 6:55:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Naive question: What if you just purposely crash AOLserver?  Will Valgrind tell you what you want then? There are probably known ways to make AOLserver crash just from Tcl, but it's especially easy if you're willing to write a bit