El dv 05 de 07 de 2013 a les 11:19 +0200, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
va escriure:
> Tino Didriksen
> writes:
>
> > On 04-07-2013 11:41, Dávid Nemeskey wrote:
> >
> > The words set and list are used interchangeably in CG. This is in
> > contrast to how these term are used in CS, and part
Tino Didriksen
writes:
> On 04-07-2013 11:41, Dávid Nemeskey wrote:
>
> The words set and list are used interchangeably in CG. This is in
> contrast to how these term are used in CS, and partly to the
> commonsensical meanings of the words as well. The current planning
> process m
On Thursday 04 July 2013 Tino Didriksen said
> As for the round-trip concern, this is all fully round-trippable. That
> XML only has means little, as it is quite easy to know whether it
> would be representable as a LIST in CG.
Ah, interesting - so LIST is a conditioned variant of SET? I
On 04-07-2013 11:41, Dávid Nemeskey wrote:
> The words /set/ and /list/ are used interchangeably in CG. This is in
> contrast to how these term are used in CS, and partly to the
> commonsensical meanings of the words as well. The current planning
> process might be just the right time to fix this i
On Thursday 04 July 2013 Dávid Nemeskey said
> I have bset and mset right now instead of LIST and SET, so at this
> point we are safe.
So if you want to roundtrip, you'll need to keep them like that. But if you
don't wan' no steenkin' roundtrip, you can conflate. :-)
--
Pob hwyl / Best
Kevin,
I have bset and mset right now instead of LIST and SET, so at this
point we are safe.
David
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> On Thursday 04 July 2013 Dávid Nemeskey said
>> Well, I haven't added any new functionality yet, so I don't see why a
>> conversion
On Thursday 04 July 2013 Dávid Nemeskey said
> Well, I haven't added any new functionality yet, so I don't see why a
> conversion with xslt(?) or a SAX parser would be a problem.
??? Once you lose info by conflating LIST and SET, how are you going to get it
back?
Anyway - not my project,
Fran: thanks for the translation. :)
Well, I haven't added any new functionality yet, so I don't see why a
conversion with xslt(?) or a SAX parser would be a problem.
David
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Francis Tyers wrote:
> I think he means converting to the new format and back again...
>
>
On Thursday 04 July 2013 Francis Tyers said
> I think he means converting to the new format and back again...
Give that boy a cream bun. :-)
--
Pob hwyl / Best wishes
Kevin Donnelly
kevindonnelly.org.uk
bangortalk.org.uk
-
I think he means converting to the new format and back again...
F.
El dj 04 de 07 de 2013 a les 14:58 +0300, en/na Dávid Nemeskey va
escriure:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> what do you mean by round-tripping in this case? Using only one tag
> instead of the two? If that, I am not sure; however, I presume the
Hi Kevin,
what do you mean by round-tripping in this case? Using only one tag
instead of the two? If that, I am not sure; however, I presume the
current compilers take advantage of the fact that there are two
separate commands, so I believe it makes sense to retain that
dichotomy.
David
On Thu,
Hi Dávid
On Thursday 04 July 2013 Dávid Nemeskey said
> That's why I use the
> bset and mset tags in the xml, to get the word "list" out of the
> equation.
Fair enough - so presumably you don't intend to allow round-tripping?
--
Pob hwyl / Best wishes
Kevin Donnelly
kevindonnelly.org.u
Kevin: as I understand, LIST creates set from tags, while SET lets you
use the same set-defining mechanism that you can use in e.g.
constraint conditions. So maybe the my wording was not right, but it
still stands that when you refer to a set you "call" two names,
depending on what command you use
Hi Dávid
On Thursday 04 July 2013 Dávid Nemeskey said
> I am Dávid Nemeskey and I'm participating in the CG -> FST GSoC
> project. The task I am currently working on is a new, XML-based format
> for CG.
Hmm.
> I have created a page in the Apertium wiki, where I've laid
> out my ideas. An
Dávid Nemeskey
writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am Dávid Nemeskey and I'm participating in the CG -> FST GSoC
> project. The task I am currently working on is a new, XML-based format
> for CG. I have created a page in the Apertium wiki, where I've laid
> out my ideas. Anyone interested in the new format,
Hi guys,
I am Dávid Nemeskey and I'm participating in the CG -> FST GSoC
project. The task I am currently working on is a new, XML-based format
for CG. I have created a page in the Apertium wiki, where I've laid
out my ideas. Anyone interested in the new format, please check it
out. I welcome comm
16 matches
Mail list logo
