Hi,
We attempted to create all the files needed for supervised training.
We assumed trying to interpret the usage info output by apertium-tagger
that the input files should have the following format:
apertium-tagger[-d] -s=n DIC CRP TSX TAGGER_DATA HTAG UNTAG
DIC: full expanded
Hi,
And FILES are:
DIC: full expanded dictionary file
CRP: training text corpus file
TSX: tagger specification file, in XML format
TAGGER_DATA: tagger data file, built in the training and used while
tagging
HTAG:hand-tagged text corpus
2012/4/2 Orosz György oros...@itk.ppke.hu:
We are one step closer now, but just wondering if there is any easy way to
create a .dix file from Apertium stream format. (or any easy way to use an
analysed text file for the tagger, instead of enumerating lemmata and
paradigms.)
That usually
Orosz György oros...@itk.ppke.hu writes:
Dear All,
I am asking your help, hope someone can clarify these thigs: I am wondering
if it is
possible to use the apertium tagger as a standalone application, without
creating all
the resources used by the MT system.
It's possible to use it by
Hi,
thanks for helping.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer unham...@fsfe.orgwrote:
Orosz György oros...@itk.ppke.hu writes:
Dear All,
I am asking your help, hope someone can clarify these thigs: I am
wondering if it is
possible to use the apertium tagger as a
El dc 28 de 03 de 2012 a les 10:20 +0200, en/na Orosz György va
escriure:
Hi,
thanks for helping.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
unham...@fsfe.org wrote:
Orosz György oros...@itk.ppke.hu writes:
Dear All,
I am asking
Thanks, for clarifying things.
It is clear. I am wondering about the supervised training: is it
possible to train the tagger (in a supervised manner) without creating
all the lexical resources used by the MT system? What is
not obvious for me, that why are these parameters needed:
El dc 28 de 03 de 2012 a les 12:43 +0200, en/na Orosz György va
escriure:
Thanks, for clarifying things.
It is clear. I am wondering about the supervised training:
is it
possible to train the tagger (in a supervised manner)
without creating
all
2012/3/28 Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com:
It isn't used for morphological analysis, the morphological analyser is
used for that. I believe that the expansion is used, along with the TSX
file, for calculating the ambiguity classes. But someone else might know
better.
It's the analysis of
Dear All,
I am asking your help, hope someone can clarify these thigs: I am wondering
if it is possible to use the apertium tagger as a standalone application,
without creating all the resources used by the MT system. We have a
morphologically disambiguated training corpus, and a morphological
10 matches
Mail list logo
