Den 5.7.2011 kl. 22.31 skrev Keld Jørn Simonsen:
>> Yes, Constraint grammar fits the bill.
> How can I disable new homonyms with that?
In order to answer (and to avoid misunderstanding) I would need to see your
output of the preceeding process (i.e. the situation that CG will be put to
fix).
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:10:09PM +0200, Trond Trosterud wrote:
>
> Den 5.7.2011 kl. 17.09 skrev Keld Jørn Simonsen:
> (...)
> complicated. There are a handful of people on this list who use CG,
> maybe you should talk to one of them. It might do what you want.
> >>> OK, who are you thi
Den 5.7.2011 kl. 17.09 skrev Keld Jørn Simonsen:
(...)
complicated. There are a handful of people on this list who use CG,
maybe you should talk to one of them. It might do what you want.
>>> OK, who are you thinking of?
>> Francis usually relentlessly promotes it. I'm surprised he hasn'
El dt 05 de 07 de 2011 a les 13:42 +0100, en/na Jimmy O'Regan va
escriure:
> 2011/7/5 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:04:40PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> >> 2011/7/5 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> >> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:21:55PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> >> >> 2011/7/3 Kel
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:42:52PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> 2011/7/5 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:04:40PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> >> 2011/7/5 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> >> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:21:55PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> >> >> 2011/7/3 Keld Jørn Simon
2011/7/5 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:04:40PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
>> 2011/7/5 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
>> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:21:55PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
>> >> 2011/7/3 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
>> >> > So that person actually understood what I meant the first t
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:04:40PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> 2011/7/5 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:21:55PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> >> 2011/7/3 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> >> > So that person actually understood what I meant the first time - good to
> >> > know that there
2011/7/5 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:21:55PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
>> 2011/7/3 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
>> > So that person actually understood what I meant the first time - good to
>> > know that there is at least one person (plus my mother) that understands
>> > me - altho
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:21:55PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> 2011/7/3 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> > So that person actually understood what I meant the first time - good to
> > know that there is at least one person (plus my mother) that understands
> > me - although the understanding may crumble ov
2011/7/3 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> So that person actually understood what I meant the first time - good to
> know that there is at least one person (plus my mother) that understands
> me - although the understanding may crumble over time.
Context is wonderful. I did say it wouldn't be done in a hurr
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:12:14PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> 2011/7/3 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> > Hi!
> >
> > I am still stuck with this problem - I cannot progress my Apertium work
> > without a solution to this problem.
> >
>
> When you write a question to a mailing list and get no answer, you
2011/7/3 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> Hi!
>
> I am still stuck with this problem - I cannot progress my Apertium work
> without a solution to this problem.
>
When you write a question to a mailing list and get no answer, you can
usually take that as a sign that nobody understood the question, and
are wa
Hi, could you describe the problem making reference to an example ? That
way it would be easier to follow...
Fran
El dg 03 de 07 de 2011 a les 20:53 +0200, en/na Keld Jørn Simonsen va
escriure:
> Hi!
>
> I am still stuck with this problem - I cannot progress my Apertium work
> without a solution
Hi!
I am still stuck with this problem - I cannot progress my Apertium work
without a solution to this problem.
best regards
keld
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:26:34PM +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am not sure of the status of a way to disabling homonyms
> introduced by new entries i
14 matches
Mail list logo