On 5 December 2016 at 16:14, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> Builds and passes all tests on linux x64 with:
>
> Perl/5.18 Apache/2.2.31 mod_perl/2.10
> Perl/5.24 Apache/2.4.23 mod_perl/2.10
>
> I'm +1 on release
All successful on Win32 (x64) / VC10 with:
perl-5.25 apache-2.2.31 mod_perl-2.0.10
[Resending from an address that's actually subscribed to the lists...]
The current mod_perl release (2.0.10) is taken from trunk. (The
httpd24 branch was only for development work leading towards the
previous release (2.0.9), and is now obsolete.)
On 17 November 2016 at 09:03, Issac Goldstand wr
On 15 November 2016 at 09:26, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't compatible with
> Apache 2.4 and requested a change. Given that we haven't released an
> updated apreq in nearly 6 years, I'm inclined to make/test the changes
> to the test
On 25 March 2014 17:12, Kandarian, Richard M wrote:
> Diff files against the svn trunk are attached.
>
> I'm using VS2008 Express and I'm no expert on doing Windows.
>
Thanks for the patches. These all look good to me. I've now committed
them to SVN in revision 1635123.
On 21 March 2014 22:17, Steve Hay wrote:
> Testing a mod_perl & libapreq build on Windows I have come across a
> problem introduced into the current SVN trunk of libapreq by revision
> 1124400.
>
> The attached patch fixes the problem for me on Windows, and hopefully
> fo
I don't know about the event MPM one, I'm afraid - that isn't used on Windows.
On 24 June 2014 08:53, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> Awesome!
>
> Are the other anomalies that Mark reported yesterday also
> Apache::Test-land?
>
> Issac
>
> On 24/06/2014 10:48
I just closed the CPAN ticket as this is fixed in (Apache-Test's) trunk already.
On 24 June 2014 08:46, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> I'll try to get to look at this in the next few days. I'm incredibly
> low on time this week, so feel free to prod me (off-list, please) if you
> don't see it soon.
>
Testing a mod_perl & libapreq build on Windows I have come across a
problem introduced into the current SVN trunk of libapreq by revision
1124400.
The attached patch fixes the problem for me on Windows, and hopefully
for any NeXT and NetWare users out there too, but it seems I don't
have commit ac
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Please test and vote on
>
> http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC2.tar.gz
> http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC2.tar.gz.asc
>
> These should have the .deps directories removed, but
> otherwise the source is unchanged. Fred, try running
> make install
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Please test and vote on the following tarball and sigfile:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC1.tar.gz
> http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC1.tar.gz.asc
>
> I've seeded the dates to be 1 week from today, so let's
> not dilly-dally please ;-)
Al
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Steve Hay
>> To: Joe Schaefer ; apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 8:52:58 AM
>> Subject: RE: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
>>
>> Steve Hay wrote:
>>&
Steve Hay wrote:
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> - Original Message
>>> From: Joe Schaefer
>>> To: Steve Hay ; apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 6:46:33 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
>>>
>>
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I cut a tarball from trunk that Randy
> and company can test out on Win32:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-trunk.tar.gz
>
> Assuming it gets tested and generally agreed
> to be worth releasing, is anyone willing to
> do the honors and volunteer for RM duties?
S
Karsten Kroesch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm running an Apache 1.3.39 with mod_perl 1.0 freshly compiled by
> myself on Solaris 10 (The Perl application I'm dealing with, refused
> to work on Apache 2.x and mod_perl 2, though using compat. mode).
>
> The application seems to work fine in the first plac
Issac Goldstand wrote:
> Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s.
>
> We're still a +1 short of release.
>
Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet?
I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet:
http://marc.info/?l=apreq-dev&m=123244555902865&w=2
I didn't vote because AFAIK I don't actually have a vote. I have commit
access, but I'm not a PMC member and therefore have no vote. Is that
correct?
-Original Message-
From: Issac Goldstand [mailto:mar...@beamartyr.net]
Sent: 07 January 2009 13:24
Cc: APREQ List
Subject: Re: [RELEASE C
Issac Goldstand wrote:
> The apreq developers are planning a maintenance release of
> libapreq1. This version primarily addresses an issue noted
> with FireFox 2.0 truncating file uploads in SSL mode.
>
> Additionally, the memory allocation algorithm for multipart
> requests has been improved.
>
Bojan Smojver wrote:
> It has been over two years since the latest apreq2 release, so it is
> time to get some new code out the door. Numerous bugs were fixed (see
> the full list in the CHANGES file) since the last official release
> (2.08), so please give us feedback on this release candidate.
>
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Please give the tarball at
http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq-1.34-RC3.tar.gz
a try and report comments/problems/etc. to the apreq-dev list
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All tests OK on WinXP (VC6) with perl-5.8.8, apache-1.3.34 and
mod_perl-1.29.
--
Issac Goldstand wrote:
The apreq developers are planning a maintenance release of
libapreq1. This version primarily addresses an issue noted
with FireFox 2.0 truncating file uploads in SSL mode.
Please give the tarball at
http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq-1.34-RC2.tar.gz
a try and repo
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Please give the tarball at
http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq-1.34-RC1.tar.gz
a try and report comments/problems/etc. to the apreq-dev list
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All tests OK on WinXP (VC6) with perl-5.8.8, apache-1.3.34 and
mod_perl-1.29.
--
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Steve Hay wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Steve Hay wrote:
I tried your patch with the current svn version (revision 518242),
but I'm still seeing intermittent failures (usually in tests 15, 16
and/or 20) either when I run "
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Randy, do you know why we use the APR_FILE_NOCLEANUP flag? Maybe
we should just remove that and see if it fixes the problem Vinay
is seeing.
Hi Steve, and all,
If you remember from
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11533762941&
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Is this what you mean?
use constant MP_GEN => $ENV{MOD_PERL}
? { ( exists $ENV{MOD_PERL_API_VERSION} and
$ENV{MOD_PERL_API_VERSION} >= 2 ) ? 2 : 1 }
: 0;
It sets the constant |MP_GEN| to 0 if mod_perl is not available, to 1 if
running under mod_pe
Patrick Galbraith wrote:
Hi all,
I used to know the trick, I think, but can't remember. I want to code my
application to be smart about whether it's on a system that can use
mod_perl2/apreq, or if I have to use CGI. I 've code my app to use CGI
successfully, but would like to keep the code th
All OK on Win32 using apache-2.2.2, perl-5.8.8 and mod_perl-2.0.3-RC2
--
Radan Computational Ltd.
The information contained in this message and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have r
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.09-rc1.tar.gz
All tests OK on Win32 (on a single run, at least--I'm not sure if the
previous problems with upload.t have gone away or not
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and VOTE on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC5.tar.gz
Builds fine and all tests pass on:
- linux, Apache/2.0.55 prefork, mod_perl 2.02, per
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
Also, just to verify that it is the stray temp files
left over that are causing the problem, does it help
if you change the APR_EXCL flag in the call to apr_file_mktemp on
about line 832 of library/util.c
to
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Sorry, but I'm still seeing quite a few failures. I started with a
completely fresh build (with your patch applied) and the top-level
"nmake test" failed a bunch of upload.t tests first time. (So it's
not j
Randy Kobes wrote:
But I think you're on the right track, in that the
problem with the temp files sticking around (and
apparently causing the occasional errors when the
upload.t test is run multiple times) comes from the
cleanup set by apr_file_open. I tried this patch:
[...]
which seems to h
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
repeatedly from the glue/perl sub-directory and see whether or not it
ever fails for you. Did you get round to trying that?
Just did. 24 times. 100% success.
My usual combination of things.
OK, that would definitely have made it fail several
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and VOTE on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC4.tar.gz
I still have glue/perl/t/apreq/upload.t failing intermittently, but
seems OK otherwise.
Philip, you were going to try running s
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
Make sure you are using the latest mod_perl sources from SVN and you
must get the latest apxs from http://perl.apache.org/dist/win32-bin/
(version 0.4).
If it only works with SVN on wink2k as I'm planning to roll mp2 2.0.3 soonish
should we hold
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
I still have an intermittent problem with one of the perl glue tests:
t\apreq\upload.t (I've mentioned this before when testing previous RC's).
D'oh I swore that got fixed.
[Tue Jul 11 09:39:27 2006] [error] [client 127
Issac Goldstand wrote:
It didn't unpack on win32 using 7-zip either... But GNU tar (the native
binary from the unixutils project on sf, not under cygwin) worked ok
(except for symbolic links, but that shouldn't be so bad).
Worked OK for me using WinZip.
I wanted to test the build, since Ra
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and VOTE on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz
[ .. ]
I'd like to make the actual release around Wednesday of next week
(07/12/2006)
I
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:> Please download, test, and report back on
the following> candidate tarball:> >
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC2.tar.gz
All OK for me now on WinXP (Apache/2.2.2
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC2.tar.gz
All OK for me now on WinXP (Apache/2.2.2, Perl/5.8.8, mod_perl/SVN),
except for the previously noted failures in t/apreq/
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:> Please download, test, and report back on
the following> candidate tarball:> >
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC1.tar.gz
WinXP/VC++ 6.0, Apache-2.2.2, Perl-5.8.8:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
- When I ran "perl Makefile.PL --with-apache2=C:/apache2" I got an
error from win32/Configure.pl about Archive-Tar being missing, but
this is not mentioned in the PREREQUISITES file and was not checked by
test_prereq in Makefile.PL before calling this script.
Committe
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC1.tar.gz
WinXP/VC++ 6.0, Apache-2.2.2, Perl-5.8.8:
- When I extracted the tarball, I found two extra directories (docs and
man) b
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Ok, please test rc3 instead:
http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.07-rc3.tar.gz
All tests OK here (WinXP/VC6, perl-5.8.7, apache-2.0.54, mp-2.0.2-rc2).
Apache2::* installed OK too.
Radan Computational Ltd.
The
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Note this is our second non-dev candidate, so please give it the
extra scrutiny it deserves. Release Candidate #2 -
http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.07-rc2.tar.gz
All tests OK for me: WinXP/VC6, perl-5.8.7 (without PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS!),
apache-2.0.54, mp2-2.0
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Note this is our first non-dev candidate, so please give it the
extra scrutiny it deserves. Release Candidate #1 -
http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.07-rc1.tar.gz
This still doesn't build on Win32 with my perl configuration, in which
PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS is not d
Steve Hay wrote:
>Having looked a little closer, I now think that I was wrong in saying
>that PerlLIO_link() is simply mapped to link(). I said that because the
>Param DLL affected failed to link with a linker error regarding the
>unresolved external "link". When I ran
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Steve Hay wrote:
>
>
>
>>The attached patch, or something similar, is required to build the
>>current svn version of libapreq2 on Win32.
>>
>>PerlLIO_link() is mapped to link(), which the Win32 CRT doesn't have
The attached patch, or something similar, is required to build the
current svn version of libapreq2 on Win32.
PerlLIO_link() is mapped to link(), which the Win32 CRT doesn't have. I
will look at changing PerlLIO_link() to map it to win32_link() on Win32
in future versions of Perl (win32_link()
48 matches
Mail list logo
