[aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

[aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-12: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Mirja Kühlewind; Benoit Claise Cc: w...@mti-systems.com; aqm-cha...@ietf.org; The IESG; draft-ietf- aqm- eval-guideli...@ietf.org; Schulthess Nicolas (F&W); aqm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-eval- guidelines-11: (with DISCUSS an

Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

ng the template provided in RFC6390 would make it rather more confusing than clear. Fine with that. Regards, Benoit Mirja On 10.06.2016 09:36, Benoit Claise wrote: Thanks Al, This is exactly the type of feedback requested from the Performance Metric Directorate. Mirja, I buy into your argumen

Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Wednesday, June 08, 2016 7:21 AM To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) Cc: w...@mti-systems.com; aqm-cha...@ietf.org; The IESG; draft-ietf-aqm- eval-guideli...@ietf.org; Benoit Claise; aqm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-eval- guidelines-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT

Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Many thanks Al. Regards, Benoit All, a few replies in-line below, Al -Original Message- From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 5:38 AM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guideli...@ietf.org; w...@mti-systems.com; aqm- cha...@ietf.org; w...@mti

Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: (with COMMENT)

Dear Rong, The ID present text says: "Active queue management (AQM) schemes, such as Random Early Detection (RED), have been around for well over a decade. AQM schemes could potentially solve the aforementioned problem. RFC 2309[RFC2309] strongly recommends the adoption of AQM s

[aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

[aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-05: (with COMMENT)

Hi Toke, - section 6 While FQ-CoDel has been shown in many scenarios to offer significant performance gains, there are some scenarios where the scheduling algorithm in particular is not a good fit. Gains compared to? I've amended this to read "..offer significant performance gains

[aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-05: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[aqm] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-06: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

EW: 4.3 AQM algorithm deployment SHOULD NOT require operational tuning I hope you will include this change, but it's not DISCUSS-worth IMO. Same remark as above regarding "AQM algorithm deployment" Regards, Benoit Please let us know your thoughts, Fred & Gorry Benoit Claise ha

[aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[aqm] on the relation between draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest-11 and draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation

Dear all, After reviewing draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest-11 (part of the IESG telechat) and draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation, I was wondering what the connection was between the two drafts. draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest will update RFC 2309, while draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation will obsolot