Re: "Not enough memory" installing Arachne 171UE

2002-12-01 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002 16:09:22 -0500 (EST), Gregor Jones wrote: > On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >> On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:38:30 -0500 (EST), I wrote: >> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >> >> The correct size of the file is 1,039,025 bytes. >> >> This lets you know that i

Re: "Not enough memory" installing Arachne 171UE

2002-12-01 Thread Gregor Jones
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Glenn McCorkle wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:38:30 -0500 (EST), I wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Glenn McCorkle wrote: > > >> The correct size of the file is 1,039,025 bytes. > > >> This lets you know that if the file you got is less than that size. > >> The download i

Re: "Not enough memory" installing Arachne 171UE

2002-11-30 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 09:43:59 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Richard Menedetter wrote: >> NOT correct that you get a DOS EXE when downloading per HTTP !!! >> They configured apache to gzip the file befor sending ! > Yes, gzipping files on the fly isn't all th

Re: "Not enough memory" installing Arachne 171UE

2002-11-30 Thread Steve
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Richard Menedetter wrote: > NOT correct that you get a DOS EXE when downloading per HTTP !!! > They configured apache to gzip the file befor sending ! Yes, gzipping files on the fly isn't all that uncommon. The angelfire server doesn't identify itself as apache though, but

"Not enough memory" installing Arachne 171UE

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Menedetter
Hi Glenn! 30 Nov 2002, "Glenn McCorkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GM> I did not create a Gzipped file. it did :) GM> The file on the site IS a Dos executable. correct. Also correct that you get a dos exe when downloading per ftp. NOT correct that you get a DOS EXE when downloading per HTTP !

Re: "Not enough memory" installing Arachne 171UE

2002-11-29 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:02:34 -0500 (EST), Gregor Jones wrote: > Just make life easy. If you want people to download a DOS executable, make > it a DOS executable. Simple! Don't put a gzipped file labelled as a DOS > executable. Then all clients will be happy. As I showed in my last mesasage

Re: "Not enough memory" installing Arachne 171UE

2002-11-29 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:38:30 -0500 (EST), Gregor Jones wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Glenn McCorkle wrote: >> The correct size of the file is 1,039,025 bytes. >> This lets you know that if the file you got is less than that size. >> The download is incomplete and you must do it again. > Errr, n

Re: "Not enough memory" installing Arachne 171UE

2002-11-29 Thread Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ
ara171ue.exe is starting with MZ = DOS exe file 171embed.zip is starting with PK = PKZIP file; use PKUNZIP to decode. Arachne browser does not mess up things, nor extensions. CU, Bastiaan On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:02:34 -0500 (EST), Gregor Jones wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Glenn McCorkle wro

Re: "Not enough memory" installing Arachne 171UE

2002-11-29 Thread Gregor Jones
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Glenn McCorkle wrote: > Linux Netscape just now did the same D**m thing. > > --a---1,021,462 11-29-02 7:04p c:\1recv\linux_ns\ara171ue.exe > (ns saved it with .exe extension and did not suggest .exe.gz or .gz) No, you asked it for a file, and it gets that file for yo

Re: "Not enough memory" installing Arachne 171UE

2002-11-29 Thread Gregor Jones
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Glenn McCorkle wrote: > The correct size of the file is 1,039,025 bytes. > > This lets you know that if the file you got is less than that size. > The download is incomplete and you must do it again. Errr, no, you managed to confuse a lot of software by creating a gzipped f