With best wishes and regards From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.webtheon.co.uk
http://www.xetronella.com
http://www.bccscotland.org.uk
Designing and building websites for the leisure and sports goods industries.
Hey Sam,
I sent my sp*m, if you sent me a reply it got caught in my filter[s] :-)
later,
rick
I sent four or five fake spams to Sam Heywood and he got them
all. Maybe the filtering is more complex and consideres subject,
text and source in various weighted combinations.
On Sun, 08 Jun 2003 08:01:03 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> Per my request I received sixteen fake spams at my altern
Per my request I received sixteen fake spams at my alternate email
address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from various folks on the Arachne
List. All of the fake spams were messages having the same subject
heading as many well known real spams. The message content
contained words and phrases and sometimes e
gt; HTMLUTIL.C (ASF did its job correctly and failed trying to exit);
> Edit your .ASF file and change
> 'reload:file:inbox.dgi' to simply 'file:inbox.dgi'
> 26B3-≈`
Done. I'm going to test it now.
>> 3) can't modify a message in OUTBOX (readm
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:52:47 +0300, Vasily Zatsepin wrote:
> Hi Glenn,
> just have tested UE01 with CYRILLIC.APM. Works :)
> My problems (I run UE01 from Windows 98 DOS-box):
Step 1) stop doing that.
Step 2) Edit msdos.sys and change 'bootgui=1' to 'bootgui=0'
Step 3) Reboot the machine so th
Hi Glenn,
just have tested UE01 with CYRILLIC.APM. Works :)
My problems (I run UE01 from Windows 98 DOS-box):
1) by installation I've got in my CONFIG.SYS a line FILES=50 instead of
quit valid and usual for me FILESHIGH=100;
2) when running POP3SMTP.ASF I've got illegal xSwap in line 792
HTMLUTIL
Just testing... please do not reply.
--
Glenn
http://arachne.cz/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/
Hi Flox,
tested your homepage and all seems OK with Arachne 1.61
But... please change the light green color to something darker for this
color is hardly readable.
But... your counter did not show
But... how to quit after signing your guestbook? Clicking 'back to
guestbook' does nothing at
Hi Florian,
I went to your page earlier today and took a quick look at it. Thanks for
reminding me that you wanted input.
I didn't see the counter, but you just now explained that it is not visible,
so that's the reason.
The color combination was what I was going to key my comments on. The w
Many thanks to all of you, who tested it.
btw: The counter isn't visible, but in the statistics it will show me
Arachne & DOS (statistics of used Software).
Textcounter (www.textcounter.org) seems to work ok!
bye, flox
ps: Some colors aren't very good. But i hope, that i will find better
one
Hi!
I updated my web page ( http://www.drdos.org ) and would need somebody,
who tests it with Arachne/DOS, because i have no internet connection and
so i cannot try if the counter (textcounter.org) is supporting DOS and
Arachne now. I would also like to hear about display-problems of the page.
Just tested w3manw9x.zip:
Windows 98 [Verze 4.10.1998]
Accessible drivesArachne 1.70
file:@:*.* Tue, 24 Dec 2002 20:23:31
_
Accessible drives
=
*A: (Floppy) 3.5" 1.44 MB
*C: Hard disk
*D: MS-RAMDRIVE RAM disk
*H: S
Just a test
Bastiaan
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Bastiaan Edelman wrote:
> Not only "CC" but also "BCC" is now available. What is BCC?
Stands for "Blind Carbon Copy."
If you send e-mail
To: your boss
CC: your co-worker
BCC: a government agency
Then all e-mails will only show the To: and CC:
addresses.
Your boss
Hi
This is a test with the just installed 171UE... there was no Arachne
Homepage (did not load).
Not only "CC" but also "BCC" is now available. What is BCC?
Is it possible to attach more than 2 files?
CU, Bastiaan
-- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
Seems everyone is having "privileges" problems.
I got a message from someone who attempted to use a form on my website
and got an error message. I tried and got a 405 also. gr ...
I checked to make certain the .pl was where it was supposed to be, I
checked the page code to make certain it
arachne-digest should work again now, i fixed the privileges
(we were reinstalling system on server - security focus...)
--
Michael "xChaos" Polak, +420 603 872 631
http://arachne.cz/ - webhosting, Linux, WWW browser Arachne
http://teckacz.cz/ - e-zine pro roztristene vedomi
http://mp3records.cz
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:27:44 -0400 (EDT), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> Ths is only another test.
>> No need to reply.
>> (as with the first one.
>> I'll know that it worked if I get it from the list)
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Ths is only another test.
>
> No need to reply.
> (as with the first one.
> I'll know that it worked if I get it from the list)
why did test #2 show up before test #1?
--
Steve Ackman
http://twoloonscoffee.com (Nee
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 20:25:09 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Ths is yet one more test.
> No need to reply.
> I got the copy sent to arachne-development
> but no reply via digest as of yet.
> (now I've subscribed to the individual message version of the list)
OK,
Ths is yet one more test.
No need to reply.
I got the copy sent to arachne-development
but no reply via digest as of yet.
(now I've subscribed to the individual message version of the list)
--
Glenn
http://arachne.cz/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.angelfire.c
Ths is only another test.
No need to reply.
(as with the first one.
I'll know that it worked if I get it from the list)
--
Glenn
http://arachne.cz/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
Ths is only a test.
No need to reply.
(I'll know that it worked if I get it from the list)
--
Glenn
http://arachne.cz/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
Hi Glenn.
or should I say: Hey Clarence! :-)
I know several of us old Rachne users wouldn't mind/would like to do
abit of "beta" testing.
Nice to see the list back up. I guess you got to speak Czech to read
most anything @ arachne.cz these days. Must be excess H2O.
later,
>> myself ... I have used every ver since about 1.6somthing 1997 orso.
> I'd love to test it out myself. And I think Glenn and Clarence
> would love to have other people testing it as well. But, as far as
> I know, unless you were part of the development team it's just
&g
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:26:57 -0700, Rick Orr wrote:
> Hi,
>>> where do I get 1.71?
>> 1.71 has not been released yet.
> I know it is not released as yet but wouldn't mind doing some testing
> myself ... I have used every ver since about 1.6somthing 1997 orso.
I
Hi,
>> where do I get 1.71?
>1.71 has not been released yet.
I know it is not released as yet but wouldn't mind doing some testing
myself ... I have used every ver since about 1.6somthing 1997 orso.
later,
rick
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 18:16:31 +, Arachne User wrote:
> testing ver. 1.7 on 486dx50/20mb/22.8.
> where do I get 1.71?
1.71 has not been released yet. It is being reviewed and tested
by Michael Polak, the author of Arachne, who will decide if it will
be released as it now stands or if further
testing ver. 1.7 on 486dx50/20mb/22.8.
where do I get 1.71?
later,
rick
-- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
Hey,
Nice to hear from ya Michael! And good to
see the list is back up and running.
Well, gotta run...never a dull moment.
See everyone later!
Wiz <{;-)
Wizard57M
Glenn Gilbreath Jr.
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/index.htm
-- DOS Internet, Close Windows and Keep the Internet Open! --
I find dramatic differences in browsing speed depending on
which packet driver, browser, combination of TSRs, etc. I am
running.
I realize that the actual download speed reported by a browser
(e.g., arachne) depends on net traffic, phone lines, etc.
Therefore, is there some reasonable way to ben
This is a test message. Please, disregard it
Cristian Burneci
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 13:02:08 +0300, Or Botton wrote:
> Personally, this sounds more like an idle threat then anything.
> 1)Windows is Microsoft's No.1 revenue profit.
> 2)Taking Windows off the market simply means "no more new versions
> of windows". Since most of the PCs ALLREADY run windows, t
Sam Ewalt wrote:
> Hey, did you hear the latest? Big Bill testified in court this
> past week that if he loses the never-ending court case that
> Microsoft would suffer such overwhelming loss of "intellectual
> property" that he would "be forced to take Windows off the market."
Personally, this s
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 18:13:49 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Both of them actually DID come from my sister and her husband.
> Their machine is running the latest-greatest WinCrap with the
> latest-greatest(???) M$ lookout express.
Hey, did you hear the latest? Big Bill testified in court this
pa
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> I got 2 of them from my own sister.
> The virus def files for F-Prot dated 17 April still do not identify
> these attachments as viri.
I've had a procmail recipe in place for some time which
dumps all such mails into "spamfolder" where they get swe
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 18:13:49 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:08:11 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 06:27:06 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Mueller wrote:
> FWIW.
> I got 2 of them from my own sister.
> The virus def files for F-Prot dated 17 April still
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:08:11 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 06:27:06 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> I received a 128 KB message with a suspicious attachment, apparently from an
>> Adaptec support address (very strange) but with a different Return-Path. I
>> didn't
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 06:27:06 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I received a 128 KB message with a suspicious attachment, apparently from an
> Adaptec support address (very strange) but with a different Return-Path. I
> didn't have KLEZ on my mind, but it looked like a likely virus. Bluegrass
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 08:40:45 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> What you received is the KLEZ.H virus. I have received more
>> than a dozen.
> I've had 46 so far.
>> The virus forges the "From:" header.
> The Return-Path is probably more interesting.
> The count so
Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>
> What you received is the KLEZ.H virus. I have received more
> than a dozen.
I've had 46 so far.
> The virus forges the "From:" header.
The Return-Path is probably more interesting.
The count so far is:
--
13 [EM
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 06:27:06 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I received a 128 KB message with a suspicious attachment, apparently from an
> Adaptec support address (very strange) but with a different Return-Path. I
> didn't have KLEZ on my mind, but it looked like a likely virus. Bluegrass
First, let me say Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition is a polite translation of
what FUBAR stands for. F stands for something stronger that tends to be shunned
in polite society (in response to a message sent before Arachne list's latest
downtime).
I received a 128 KB message with a suspicious att
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:36:30 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:32:58 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:05:06 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>>> Just a test, no need to reply.
>> Hello Glenn:
>> Glad to know the list i
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:32:58 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:05:06 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> Just a test, no need to reply.
> Hello Glenn:
> Glad to know the list is back up. Maybe the list got closed
> down temporarily as a result of the ongo
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:32:58 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:05:06 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> Just a test, no need to reply.
> Hello Glenn:
> The
> virus forges the email address of innocent people into the "To:"
> header.
O
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:05:06 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Just a test, no need to reply.
Hello Glenn:
Glad to know the list is back up. Maybe the list got closed
down temporarily as a result of the ongoing scourge of the
KLEZ.H virus. I have received more than a dozen of them. The
vi
Just a test, no need to reply.
--
Glenn
http://arachne.cz/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
Just testing.
No need to reply.
--
Glenn
http://arachne.cz/
http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
New test
(please disregard) ;)
--
Glenn
http://arachne.cz/
http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
test e-mail
-- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Client
-- Arachne V1.69, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
testing testing 123
Mel
Sorry to waste the bandwidth. Need to see if this will work with the
list server. Thanks
John
-- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
Mel wrote:
>The .asf script seems to work ok up untill it is asked to close
>down.That is, it accesses the pop3 server ok, then the smtp server but
>then things go xswap shaped there on in.
And do you have a history list before you run the ASF? As I said (over one
week ago) I think I know what th
Hi gangue,
Please excuse use of bandwidth, testing .asf file
Regards
mel
-- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
Hi there,
No go with the xswap thing. Had to re-install arachne over the existing
install to get it to come out of the xswap error and give me arachne
back.
The .asf script seems to work ok up untill it is asked to close
down.That is, it accesses the pop3 server ok, then the smtp server but
then
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:57:12 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:
> Or,
> Too bad you didn't find this *before* Michael released the 3 versions of
> 1.70. It's obvious [on my system] that CSS 1 support isn't quite fine
> tuned yet.
... Well, he -did- say that its beta, and is probebly really bad.
Its the
This is quite intresting.
Arachne's CSS support is still beta, partial and limited, but it should
be fun to have a look at the following page and see what it can do:
http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/
Warning: Some of these tests caused Arachne to crash. Be carfull. ;)
The Arachne web site is doing something again that it has done when a new
version has come out.
When I viewed it with 1.69, it told me I had the latest version. Now that
I'm viewing it with 1.70, it tells me I have an old version.
--
...This msg brought to you by NEIL PARKS Beachwood, Oh
Dear Clarence:
>This seems to me like just a matter of personal preference. I did
>have this problem when I started. I don't do much with WATTCP.CFG
>anyway and I don't dial from outside Arachne. I did increase the
>sock delay, though. I just insert the command in Arachne.bat. I
>know
howard schwartz wrote:
>
> Short of that, does any one know of a better way to check if epppd is
> already in memory, before trying to load it?
Termin will give an error message if no packet driver is found when you
try to remove it. So, if you were to run termin before dialing, not only
would yo
ard, the batch file I use to
>dial the internet and load epppd could sorely use a way to test whether
>epppd is already, or still in memory before it proceeds.
>
>However the best I can do write now is to check if the variable,
>wattcp.cfg is set -- something I do when I load epppd. I
, no increased "memory loss."
BTW, I didn't bother to clear cache nor to turn images off. I wouldn't
normally do that before going to chat, so why fudge on testing?
In all fairness, I decided to run the test with 1.68.
I checked memory before clicking on the first link, and dis
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:35:05 -0500, Robert Deering wrote:
> I've had car batteries measure as high as 14.2 volts static and be
> worhtless.
I suppose that such a damage condition can result from overcharging the
battery, or from charging it too fast. A bad voltage regulator could
be at fault.
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:24:21 -0500, Roger Turk wrote:
> Sam Heywood wrote:
> My point is simply this: A good voltage reading does not necessarily mean
> that a battery is good. You have to perform a load test. A voltmeter does
> not do this.
> Do not try the above experiment
ill get a reading of 12 volts. The battery passes the
> voltage test, but it will not pass a load test because it won't provide even
> enough power anymore to turn on my headlights. If it can't even turn on the
> headlights, then of course I know that the starter motor won&#x
orning my headlights will
no longer be shining and I will know that I have a bad battery. If I then
turn off the headlight switch and use my voltmeter again to read the battery's
voltage, I will still get a reading of 12 volts. The battery passes the
voltage test, but it will not pass a load t
Sam Heywood wrote:
>
>---snip---< Then I can turn the headlight
>switch on and leave it on all night long. By morning my headlights will
>no longer be shining and I will know that I have a bad battery.
>
>Do not try the above experiment at home unless you have some very
>understanding neighbo
will know that I have a bad battery. If I then
turn off the headlight switch and use my voltmeter again to read the battery's
voltage, I will still get a reading of 12 volts. The battery passes the
voltage test, but it will not pass a load test because it won't provide even
enough po
Neil,
That always happens before the general release is made. It's a
check of 'if not then' rather than 'if <> then'
l.d.
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:04:05 +-0100XYZ(nWxst), Neil Parks wrote:
> The version test on the arachne web site is backwards. When I
The version test on the arachne web site is backwards. When I browsed
it with 1.66, it told me had the current version. Since I upgraded to
1.67, it tells me I'm using an old version and I should upgrade.
--
...This msg brought to you by NEIL PARKS Beachwood, Ohio
mailto:[
On Mon, 02 Oct 2000 06:24:52 -0400, neil tanner wrote:
> Greetings
> The modem test that Clarence sent just came through on this end as
> random letters and numbers
Hello Neil:
It probably came through as a Base 64 encoded file, rather than as random
letters and numbers. Yo
neil tanner wrote:
>
> Greetings
> The modem test that Clarence sent just came through on this end as
> random letters and numbers
So Mozilla 4.7 doesn't know what to do with a .zip by default ?
I sent it with Moz 2.02.
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE.
Greetings
The modem test that Clarence sent just came through on this end as
random letters and numbers
I found a program called portinfo that checks for modems etc. It found
it and my mouse, and gave its location etcbut I have to be honest,
some of this is beyond me, I am still a
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 22:52:23 -0400, neil tanner wrote:
> don't read
> testing
ops.
I read it.
- Clarence Verge
- Using Arachne V1.62 for a change
don't read
testing
well, I got it. hee,hee. not using Arachne right now but not using
bill's browser.
On Wed, 09 Aug 2000 14:49:20 +, Bastiaan Edelman wrote:
> CC-Test:
> To: Eko Priono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Lets see what happens Bastiaan
Indeed the last two CC addresses did not
CC-Test:
To: Eko Priono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lets see what happens Bastiaan
-- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Client
-- Arachne V1.61, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
On Wed, 02 Aug 2000 22:41:24 -0700, Rick wrote:
> So you think those "anomalies" are related to either processor speed or
> RAM or ... I'll have to load "Rachne" up on this (450AMD/128Mb) or the
> (486DX66/32Mb) to check that out. Or might that be the old video card?
>
Hope you don't m
On Wed, 02 Aug 2000 09:55:33 +, "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> This is a test of Arachne 166 ... on my latest freebee (free parts)
> puter. 386DX40/8Mb/14.4
> So far: install went great, found modem (com2), logged on no prob ...
> now to see
just ran chkdsk, scandisk & NDD after last 'rachne run ... no probs.
there were lost chains & clusters from last rendition of 'rachne [164 i
think] on that drive. has been reformatted of course.
rick
hi Clarence,
So you think those "anomalies" are related to either processor speed or
RAM or ... I'll have to load "Rachne" up on this (450AMD/128Mb) or the
(486DX66/32Mb) to check that out. Or might that be the old video card?
BTW, Rachne [165src] worked great on this puter when
Rick wrote:
>
> Well, I guess I better quit this & send (getting some anomalies ... or
> not) ... ah big yellow "blocks" whilst typing ... then they go away?
> umm.
Yeah those "anomalies" really make you nervous when you use a slow machine.
They subside to little twitches on a P90.
I'll bet Mich
allo again,
continuing test. I see my last mess went thru, kewl.
Am using EGA/CGA on this machine so am losing some video definition [I
guess, or so the instructions say ... but it looks real good].
This email prog seems to work better then the last time I used it [ver
165 Rachne].
This ver
A slighly different note : The Trace Center site lists several DOS
software that helps make standard information technologies and
telecommunications systems more accessible and usable by people
with disabilities.
http://trace.wisc.edu/world/computer_access/dos/index.html
Dev Teelucksingh
[EM
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:40:54 -0600, karen lewellen wrote:
> hi folks,
> granted i have not done much with this, but well
> here is what i tried.
> i set up my speech program t o speak characters sent to the
> printer port, and of course not to send those to the printer.
> i entered arachne, a
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:40:54 -0600, karen lewellen wrote:
> hi folks,
> granted i have not done much with this, but well
> here is what i tried.
> i set up my speech program t o speak characters sent to the
> printer port, and of course not to send those to the printer.
> i entered arachne, a
hi folks,
granted i have not done much with this, but well
here is what i tried.
i set up my speech program t o speak characters sent to the
printer port, and of course not to send those to the printer.
i entered arachne, and
it talked! some,
granted, i have no idea what i am listening for. b
Bernie wrote:
>
> Also when you send you send to your e-mail server which might have a faster
> connection than arachne.cz
Chat seems instantaneous.
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
Clarence wrote:
>But it's still interesting to know that the Arachne server takes about
>6 seconds to serve each subscriber in sequence. It seems that there MUST
>be a more efficient way to do it. It doesn't take ME twice as long to
>send mail with a "CC" as without.
I don't think that BCC is us
Bernie wrote:
>
> Quite frankly I wonder why you are doing these tests, they seem
> rather useless to me.
Hi Bernie;
I did the initial test just to see how much difference it made. I was
about 1/2 way down the list when I mistakenly unsubscribed the wrong
address and had to re-subs
Glenn wrote:
>Why is the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so slow compared to arachne-development???
>Or is it that arachne-development is so *fast* compared to arachne???
Because you are (most likely) the last one on the arachne list (you just
subscribed). Your position on the arachne-development list is much
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:25:19 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:02:47 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 20:39:57 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>>> this is only a test
>> "loop time" 29 seconds.
>> I'll t
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:02:47 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 20:39:57 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> this is only a test
> "loop time" 29 seconds.
> I'll try 1 more.
"loop time" 17 seconds.
Both tests sent to [EMAIL PROTEC
1st loop was 15 minutes
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
Damn. I unsubscribed the wrong address again.
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
Here's another one of those pages that can be used to test Arachne's
animated GIF function.
http://www.francomm.com/home/skand/web/homepage1//smiles.htm
Have a nice day.
Glenn McCorkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] North Jackson, Ohio, USA
DOS prog. for QV cameras http://www.angelfire.com/id
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 10:34:09 +0200, Cristian Burneci wrote:
> Testing (mail bounced for a few days)...
> -- Arachne V1.61, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
Ten-four! Received loud and clear!
BTW, instead of sending your messages addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
try sending them to [EMAIL P
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
