Re: ArcEm OS X port

2012-05-27 Thread Michael Dales
Hey there, For reference, I did the original port way back when. I suspect the easier thing to do would be to start the Xcode project afresh. The way the original project was built I suspect wasn't great, as Xcode wanted really to be at the root of the project, but I was directed to ensure all

Re: Minimum hardware emulation needed to boot a OS on ARM?

2007-05-12 Thread Michael Dales
Hi Michael, For my PhD I wrote a different ARM simulator (called SWARM) that was minimal enough to run uLinux - a micro controller linux implementation. It was a few years ago now, but as I recall I needed to emulate very little hardware. Particularly as uLinux does not use virtual memory,

Re: ArcEm port to GP2X

2006-02-27 Thread Michael Dales
Hey there, So chatting to Peter it appears that half the list has been left out on some private discussion as to how and why things are done in ArcEm. So... 1) Ralph: Sorry for arguing about something that was apparently already clear - in that you appear to already be doing the both approach

Re: ArcEm port to GP2X

2006-02-27 Thread Michael Dales
On 2/27/06, Ian Jeffray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ralph Corderoy wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > > >>Perhaps then it's time to fork some stuff then. > > > > > > Can we avoid top-posting on this list please. > > Can we avoid CCing everyone on everything if we're also > using the list? :-) Int

Re: ArcEm port to GP2X

2006-02-27 Thread Michael Dales
Perhaps then it's time to fork some stuff then. There's active development in getting ArcEm to support RISC OS better at the moment - I'm not aware of anyone who's using NetBSD putting in a lot of effort. We already have hostfs support in there which is through a module hack (excellent work by tho

Re: arcem working directory

2005-10-31 Thread Michael Dales
On 10/31/05, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 21:12 -0700, Peter Naulls wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Michael Dales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > &g

arcem working directory

2005-10-20 Thread Michael Dales
Hi there, I'd like to suggest a small change to the way ArcEm finds files - made a bit more relevant due to hostfs stuff. Currently the default assumption is that ArcEm looks for files in the current working dir. On Mac OS X and Windows this is a broken assumption, as users will click on

Re: Shutdown/restart

2003-05-27 Thread Michael Dales
simply be fixed. I know it's a pain, but if ArcEm is to be hosted on multiple platforms it does have to conform to the local standards, and this will require some parts to change to suit a non-(standard-unix) way of doing things, like this and the way preferences ar