Oh, sorry, I forgot to say I like the basic idea in FS#7982
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
Of course it's up to the developers what goes in, and I can understand
the repeated request for ideas and not comments, but I hope you can also
understand that people might be a bit concerned that the (on the whole)
beautifully simple PKGBUILD scripts might begin to go the way of gentoo
or debi
On Sat 2007-09-22 03:42 , Julian Saraceni wrote:
> Am Samstag, 22. September 2007 01:22:00 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > On 9/21/07, Jürgen Hötzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well, because the sender used a subscribed email address:
> > >
> > > (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1IYQPI-0003ti
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Guys please. The original request was for ideas, not comments.
>
> Perhaps this is why it was never brought up in public? Because the
> signal-to-noise would be too low?
>
>
Apologies, I was also supposed to comment on the previous suggestion by
Essien Ita Essien that
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Christer Solskogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>
>>> One of the things we'd LOVE to do with PKGBUILDs is create the ability
>>> to build multiple packages from one PKGBUILD. That is, we could run
>>> make once, and create: foo, foo-libs, an
Guys please. The original request was for ideas, not comments.
Perhaps this is why it was never brought up in public? Because the
signal-to-noise would be too low?
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
Elyess ZOUAGHI wrote:
> personnaly i dont want to have a
> complete package like gambas installed because i only need its runtime
> and this goes for very other packages.
>
>
Is this going to end up with a whole heap of foo-dev packages like what
happens on other distributions... I gave up on s
On 9/21/07, Jürgen Hötzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, because the sender used a subscribed email address:
>
> (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1IYQPI-0003ti-7B
Yeah that's what I was looking at, but I can't seem to find a way to
deny envelope-from posts, but that can actually be usefu
Elyess ZOUAGHI wrote:
> hello,
>
> why do we need package splitting ? personnaly i dont want to have a
> complete package like gambas installed because i only need its runtime
> and this goes for very other packages.
>
> i was messing with makepkg latly to find a way to add spliting packages
> a
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:34:16AM +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Friday 21 September 2007, Manny Calavera wrote:
> > ...whats awesome is that it was an HTML file and, in mutt, had
> > absolutely no effect.
>
> Same in Kmail...
>
> Anyway, I don't really understand how this email could ha
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:52:41PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
There is a recent feature request about it, including a patch :
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7982
And also a beginning of discussion on pacman
hello,
why do we need package splitting ? personnaly i dont want to have a
complete package like gambas installed because i only need its runtime
and this goes for very other packages.
i was messing with makepkg latly to find a way to add spliting packages ability,
i like the rpm way but ithink i
On 9/21/07, Christer Solskogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
> > One of the things we'd LOVE to do with PKGBUILDs is create the ability
> > to build multiple packages from one PKGBUILD. That is, we could run
> > make once, and create: foo, foo-libs, and foo-scripts all at the
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> One of the things we'd LOVE to do with PKGBUILDs is create the ability
> to build multiple packages from one PKGBUILD. That is, we could run
> make once, and create: foo, foo-libs, and foo-scripts all at the same
> time.
In case some of you takes this email wrong; I dont wa
On 9/21/07, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:52:41PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > > There is a recent feature request about it, including a patch :
> > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7982
> > >
> > > And also a beginning of discussion on pacman-dev ML :
> > > http
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:52:41PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > There is a recent feature request about it, including a patch :
> > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7982
> >
> > And also a beginning of discussion on pacman-dev ML :
> > http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-September/0
On 9/21/07, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:58:38PM -0500, Mark Schneider wrote:
> > On 9/21/07, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mister Dobalina schrieb:
> > > > Now that gcc/gcc-libs is split, does it matter what
> > > > order they are built in? Shoul
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:58:38PM -0500, Mark Schneider wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mister Dobalina schrieb:
> > > Now that gcc/gcc-libs is split, does it matter what
> > > order they are built in? Should it be
> > > build,install,build,install or
> > > build
On 9/21/07, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mister Dobalina schrieb:
> > Now that gcc/gcc-libs is split, does it matter what
> > order they are built in? Should it be
> > build,install,build,install or
> > build,build,install,install?
>
> Doesn't matter. Right now, a complete gcc bootst
Hi,
Both of subj packages contains /usr/man/man3/index.3.gz on x86_64.
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
Mister Dobalina schrieb:
> Now that gcc/gcc-libs is split, does it matter what
> order they are built in? Should it be
> build,install,build,install or
> build,build,install,install?
Doesn't matter. Right now, a complete gcc bootstrap is done when
building each of them. This takes a lot longer, bu
hi,
how can I enable cachemgr.cgi on squid on archlinux ?
thankyou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
Now that gcc/gcc-libs is split, does it matter what
order they are built in? Should it be
build,install,build,install or
build,build,install,install?
Cheers.
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the
boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yah
hello,
thank you all
i found the problem and it was like Travis sayed replacing fglrx by libgl-dri.
i wrote a bug report about that and it looks like its a pacman bug
Virtually,
Elyess
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailm
hello,
thank you all
i found the problem and it was like Travis sayed replacing fglrx by libgl-dri.
i wrote a bug report about that and it looks like its a pacman bug
Virtually,
Elyess
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailm
On 9/21/07, Elyess ZOUAGHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I did a clean arch base installation then installed the X server with
> xf86-video-{vesa,vga,nv} and mouse and keybard x driver.
>
> i uses an nvidia agp card fx5200 128mb
and that's why you do not need fglrx (ati) driver
if you wa
26 matches
Mail list logo
