--- Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/31/06, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thats unfortunately the way ndiswrapper works.
> Some drivers work with
> > it others dont. I tried three different windows
> drivers with this
> > wireless network card, each with varying resu
On 1/31/06, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thats unfortunately the way ndiswrapper works. Some drivers work with
> it others dont. I tried three different windows drivers with this
> wireless network card, each with varying results and stability.
I have to side with James here. If ndis
Thats unfortunately the way ndiswrapper works. Some drivers work with
it others dont. I tried three different windows drivers with this
wireless network card, each with varying results and stability.
You mentioned intel chipsets j l, there are native drivers for all of them.
On 1/31/06, j l <[EMA
--- oscar estrada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my case, I have an Athlon XP-M and the cpufreq
> modules don't work
> with a SMP system, so I have to recompile the
> kernel, the ndiswrapper
> modules and my webcam module every time a new kernel
> gets out. It
> would be great if we could have
In my case, I have an Athlon XP-M and the cpufreq modules don't work
with a SMP system, so I have to recompile the kernel, the ndiswrapper
modules and my webcam module every time a new kernel gets out. It
would be great if we could have a non-SMP kernel, although I know it
would mean extra work an
As has been mentioned, feel free to use the nosmp option.
A full distro kernel compile takes more than half an hour on my
system, and quite possibly well over an hour on most peoples so I am
sure you can understand the extra time and work that would be involved
for our already overloaded devs.
P
I answer to all responses :)
Like I said, recompile my kernel isn't a problem. But if ndiswrapper is
avaible in extra, it would be great to work with a stock kernel else
it's a little ridiculous no?
My computer freezes after some minutes, that's the problem.
SMP is good for pc with more than
Ever thought about compiling a kernel yourself? :)
It's not very hard, and you can choose whenever you want it as a
package or not... :)
And it's probably much easier than trying to change the arch linux
package core :-)
Oscar
On 13:02 Sun 29 Jan , SaintShakaJin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've a p
On 1/29/06, SaintShakaJin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've a problem with ndiswrapper (1.8) and stock kernel 2.6.15.1. I know
> where it comes, SMP :(
> Ndiswrapper isn't compatible with SMP so I've 2 questions.
Ndiswrapper claims to be incompatible with SMP, however, I have always
use
--- Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SaintShakaJin schrieb:
> > Almost every distribution do a kernel with and
> without SMP activated so
> > why Arch makes a kernel SMP by default. Is there a
> reason? If yes, which
> > one.
> > It isn't a troll.
> >
>
> Times have changed. Lots
SaintShakaJin schrieb:
> Almost every distribution do a kernel with and without SMP activated so
> why Arch makes a kernel SMP by default. Is there a reason? If yes, which
> one.
> It isn't a troll.
>
Times have changed. Lots of new cpus are taking advantages from smp
mode. Think off all thos
Hello,
I've a problem with ndiswrapper (1.8) and stock kernel 2.6.15.1. I know
where it comes, SMP :(
Ndiswrapper isn't compatible with SMP so I've 2 questions.
Almost every distribution do a kernel with and without SMP activated so
why Arch makes a kernel SMP by default. Is there a reason? If
12 matches
Mail list logo
