Am Mittwoch 21 Mai 2008 00:26:29 schrieb Juergen Starek:
Hello everybody,
a few days ago, my Eclipse installation (which had worked fine for some
months before that) stopped working. Eclipse will start, but only to the
end of its initialization routine. The splash screen does not disappear.
Xavier wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can confirm it does not happen with the official binaries, although the
icons do not show but that could be because I ran it from my home directory.
I have also rebuilt via abs to get branding and that
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Juergen Starek wrote:
a few days ago, my Eclipse installation (which had worked fine for
some months before that) stopped working.
I'm not experiencing this problem, but a bunch of people started
running into another problem with Eclipse since the upgrade to
Hi,
Was this change forwarded to the OpenSSH developers? I am sure that if
it is indeed better security-wise to hash the known_hosts file, they
would change the default configuration upstream. I'm also sure that they
would give very good reasons for not wanting to do so.
Thanks,
Dimitris
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Was this change forwarded to the OpenSSH developers? I am sure that if
it is indeed better security-wise to hash the known_hosts file, they
would change the default configuration upstream. I'm also sure that
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 10:14 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
Pacman itself is ready for .tar.bz2 package files. The whole issue
with .bz2 files is that compression and decompression times increase a
lot without giving the same amount of size reduction back. We've done
some recent tests with
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Was this change forwarded to the OpenSSH developers? I am sure that if
it is indeed better security-wise to hash the known_hosts file, they
would change the default configuration upstream. I'm also sure that
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't this problem be circumvented by spawning the lzma command line
utility, and piping all data to it? I understand that this perhaps
negates the purpose of libarchive, but the overhead should be small.
That
eliott schrieb:
Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
unhashed known_hosts *is* more unsecure.
If someone gets access to your account, they would get
a) your key
b) a list of hosts that the key is valid for
hey! great!
Compund this with the fact that many people use
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 18:47 +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 10:14 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
Pacman itself is ready for .tar.bz2 package files. The whole issue
with .bz2 files is that compression and decompression times increase a
lot without giving the same
Aaron Griffin wrote:
That's actually not entirely true. Dan and I investigated this. The
previous low memory issues were caused by the entire install system
never leaving the initramfs, and remaining entirely in RAM - which
soaked far more than pacman ever will. Additionally, with the dynamic
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 19:39 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
What's the memory usage when unzipping an LZMA file? Is it much higher
than the needs of gzip? We already have problems supporting low-memory
systems with our installer, adding a compression algorithm that eats
more memory will cause
On Thursday 22 May 2008 00:13:27 Tobias Kieslich wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Denis Alessandro Altoe Falqueto wrote:
It seems that LZMA lib is licensed with LGPL and has an special
exception that permits to link (statically or dinamicaly) without
being bound by the LGPL terms.
I thought
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Arvid Ephraim Picciani
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you are allowed to link dynamicly, now read if you are allowed to run the
linked program. Not speaking of actually distributing it.
Strange, why would it be allowed to link and not to run the linked
program? It
I also have this problem.
I am using gnome, and from the menu, eclipse stop at the startup screen
and eat 100% cpu. while I run eclipse from command line, it works
without a problem.
Regards.
On Tue, 20 May 2008 22:26:29 + (UTC)
Juergen Starek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
15 matches
Mail list logo
