Hello, everyone,
I'm a freshman in ArchLinux. As my lab owns a printer connected to a
windows system, I need to connect it using cups.
I read the wiki guide and do as what is told. However, I always
receive this messge:
Connection failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
My /etc/cups/pri
On Friday 08 January 2010 19:18:46 Paul Ezvan wrote:
> Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 17:44 -0600, David C. Rankin a écrit :
> > On 01/08/2010 03:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> > > hi List,
> > >
> > > I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
> > >
> > > I looked at the wiki re th
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 17:44 -0600, David C. Rankin a écrit :
> On 01/08/2010 03:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> > hi List,
> >
> > I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
> >
> > I looked at the wiki re the various methods of upgrading the driver:
> >
> > [r...@laptop
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 16:59, Jan de Groot wrote:
> I just created a todo list containing 163 packages. This todo list
> contains all packages that link to libpng and that should get rebuilt
> when we update to libpng 1.4.0.
What is the new soname? I'd like to make a list for arch-games as well.
On 01/08/2010 03:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> hi List,
>
> I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
>
> I looked at the wiki re the various methods of upgrading the driver:
>
> [r...@laptop pkg]# vbox_build_module
> Building vboxdrv for Linux 2.6.32-ARCH
> make[1]: Entering
On Saturday 09 January 2010 08:56:13 Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> > hi List,
> >
> > I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
>
> Install kernel26-headers (a new package) as well.
>
Thank you so much to both Ray and Leandro , all
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:10 PM, richard terry wrote:
> On Saturday 09 January 2010 08:56:13 Ray Kohler wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
>> > hi List,
>> >
>> > I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
>>
>> Install kernel26-headers (a new package)
On Saturday 09 January 2010 08:56:13 Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> > hi List,
> >
> > I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
>
> Install kernel26-headers (a new package) as well.
>
kernel26-2.6.32.2-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
kernel-heade
Dude look that deps, depends=('libxmu' 'gcc' 'make' 'kernel26-headers')
You need kernel26-headers, some issues about new kernel series [1].
And some comments about that (virtualbox bin) in [2].
[1] http://www.archlinux.org/news/477/
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9753
--
Leandro
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> hi List,
>
> I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
Install kernel26-headers (a new package) as well.
Hi,
I'm glad the .32 kernel comes with the new firewire stack, so i can
finally use dvgrab (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=79856)
well.. that's what i thought.
this kernel does not recognize my pci firewire card with the via vt6306
chipset.
(running all latest packages from core, not te
hi List,
I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
I looked at the wiki re the various methods of upgrading the driver:
[r...@laptop pkg]# vbox_build_module
Building vboxdrv for Linux 2.6.32-ARCH
make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/VirtualBox/src/vboxdrv'
for f in . linux r0drv
signoff x86_64
On 01/08/2010 02:06 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
bump to latest bugfix version.
Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17538 # added blktrace
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17106 # finally added CONFIG_MMIOTRACE
http://bugs.archlinux.org/tas
On Friday 08 January 2010 10:23:20 Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Baho Utot
wrote:
> > FYI
> > I was having trouble with networking several years ago and had a
> > /etc/host like yours. I posted to usenet and the network gurus there
> > promptly busted me for that lay
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 18:11 +0100, Xavier wrote:
>> Why doesn't Arch ship that package ? It's a single 6 lines file, it
>> cannot hurt anything.
>> I just realized arch patches libdrm to not require it :
>> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packa
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:11:40PM +0100, Xavier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > Am 08.01.2010 17:24, schrieb a...@nezmer.info:
> >> Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
> >> The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 18:11 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Why doesn't Arch ship that package ? It's a single 6 lines file, it
> cannot hurt anything.
> I just realized arch patches libdrm to not require it :
> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/libdrm/repos/extra-i686/no-pthread-stubs.patch
> But of
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17011
[gimageview] segfaults
This package hasn't been updated since 2004 and segfaults. The bug
report explains this well.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 08.01.2010 17:24, schrieb a...@nezmer.info:
>> Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
>> The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
>> and tools like pbget would fetch an outdated PKGBUILD.
>
> W
Am 08.01.2010 17:24, schrieb a...@nezmer.info:
> Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
> The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
> and tools like pbget would fetch an outdated PKGBUILD.
While you may be right, such tools must be able to handle packag
Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
and tools like pbget would fetch an outdated PKGBUILD.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
>
> FYI
> I was having trouble with networking several years ago and had a /etc/host
> like yours. I posted to usenet and the network gurus there promptly busted me
> for that layout.
>
> They told me to do this instead:
>
> #
> 127.0.0.1
On Friday 08 January 2010 03:54:23 Allan McRae wrote:
> Ionut Biru wrote:
> > On 01/08/2010 09:01 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> Frederic Bezies wrote:
> >>> Hello everybody.
> >>>
> >>> Yesterday, my computer installed from testing last networkmanager
> >>> version, 0.7.998-1. It worked OK until I sh
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 18:54 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Ionut Biru wrote:
> > On 01/08/2010 09:01 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> Frederic Bezies wrote:
> >>> Hello everybody.
> >>>
> >>> Yesterday, my computer installed from testing last networkmanager
> >>> version, 0.7.998-1. It worked OK until I sh
Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/08/2010 09:01 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
Frederic Bezies wrote:
Hello everybody.
Yesterday, my computer installed from testing last networkmanager
version, 0.7.998-1. It worked OK until I shut down my computer.
This morning, I cannot get any single program to be launched i
On 01/08/2010 09:01 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
Frederic Bezies wrote:
Hello everybody.
Yesterday, my computer installed from testing last networkmanager
version, 0.7.998-1. It worked OK until I shut down my computer.
This morning, I cannot get any single program to be launched in gnome,
even xterm
Hi guys,
latest bugfix release.
Please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi guys,
bump to latest bugfix version.
Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17538 # added blktrace
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17106 # finally added CONFIG_MMIOTRACE
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17696 # fixed intel wireless
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17687
28 matches
Mail list logo
