On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
rodb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I've posted on forum (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=88509)
that the package extra/cegui was out of date and then was instructed
by Allan to post the modified PKGBUILD on the mailing list.
Is there any reason why building x86_64 packages under
qemu-system-x86_64 would be a bad idea? It is a little slow, but it is
usable. Plus, qemu has a curses interface.
-- Chris
Am Montag 11 Januar 2010 schrieb Chris Brannon:
Is there any reason why building x86_64 packages under
qemu-system-x86_64 would be a bad idea? It is a little slow, but it is
usable. Plus, qemu has a curses interface.
-- Chris
why not using a chroot for this?
ok this only works if you
Am 11.01.2010 17:48, schrieb Chris Brannon:
Is there any reason why building x86_64 packages under
qemu-system-x86_64 would be a bad idea? It is a little slow, but it is
usable. Plus, qemu has a curses interface.
It is not a little slow, but painfully slow (remember: the compiler runs
in an
OK - I am once again attempting to use Arch install for 2010 on my
system which has two identical hard drives and I simply want to mirror
both drives in a RAID1 array. I have read the Wiki so much at this
point it has become memorized. I am NOT using LVM or anything, just a
Arch user who wants
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com wrote:
OK - I am once again attempting to use Arch install for 2010 on my
system which has two identical hard drives and I simply want to mirror
both drives in a RAID1 array. I have read the Wiki so much at this
point it
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:52:57PM -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
Here is my error:
::Running Hook [mdadm]
Waiting 10 seconds for device /dev/md0
Root device '/dev/md0' doesn't exist, attempting to create it
ERROR: Failed to parse block device for ids for /dev/md0
ERROR: Unable to detect
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:36:55AM -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Paul Mattal p...@mattal.com wrote:
On 01/06/2010 01:09 AM, Paul Mattal wrote:
I've just placed dcron 4.2 into [testing]. This is a major update to dcron,
under a new maintainer (who is an Arch
On Monday 11 January 2010 12:52:57 pm Carlos Williams wrote:
OK - I am once again attempting to use Arch install for 2010 on my
system which has two identical hard drives and I simply want to mirror
both drives in a RAID1 array. I have read the Wiki so much at this
point it has become
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:40:46AM -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
rodb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I've posted on forum (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=88509)
that the package extra/cegui was out of date and then was
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I always wait cat /proc/mdstat until the raid is finished, even though it says
you don't have to, I don't want any trouble :)
I see your point but when you have 2x 1 TB drives, you're in for a wait.
#mdadm -D --scan
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Jim Pryor
lists+arch-gene...@jimpryor.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:36:55AM -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Paul Mattal p...@mattal.com wrote:
On 01/06/2010 01:09 AM, Paul Mattal wrote:
I've just placed dcron 4.2 into
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 13:38, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
If you modify it, you should add it to the NoUpgrade line in
/etc/pacman.conf. The backup array is for what we INTEND to be
modified. Users are more than welcome to do what we don't intend, but
you need to control
On Mon 11 Jan 2010 13:54 -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 13:38, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
If you modify it, you should add it to the NoUpgrade line in
/etc/pacman.conf. The backup array is for what we INTEND to be
modified. Users are more than welcome
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
rodb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:40:46AM -0500, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense
rodb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I've posted on forum
On Monday 11 January 2010 13:36:06 Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
I always wait cat /proc/mdstat until the raid is finished, even though it
says you don't have to, I don't want any trouble :)
I see your point but when you
Am 11.01.2010 19:38, schrieb Aaron Griffin:
If you modify it, you should add it to the NoUpgrade line in
/etc/pacman.conf. The backup array is for what we INTEND to be
modified. Users are more than welcome to do what we don't intend, but
you need to control whether of not pacman mucks with
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:49:50 +0100
Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenm...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:20:32 +0100
Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenm...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this is just a small fix for FS#13876 -[rp-pppoe] package: .so file
in /etc (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13876).
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:07:19 +0100
Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Sonntag 10 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
On 01/10/2010 09:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Samstag 09 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
On 01/09/2010 09:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Samstag 09
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 11.01.2010 19:38, schrieb Aaron Griffin:
If you modify it, you should add it to the NoUpgrade line in
/etc/pacman.conf. The backup array is for what we INTEND to be
modified. Users are more than welcome to do what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I've been seeing some very passionate pleeds in posts lately
concerning top-posting of replies. I, for one, don't really mind
seeing top-posted e-mails like that because I can see the reply
quickly and if the thread is current in my mind, I
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 21:33 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
snip
If bottom-posting is so passionately desirable, then may I suggest
people trim down the history of a thread to the most recent 1 or 2
generations back. Or maybe even better, just reply with no quoting
and and briefly summarize the
On Mon 11 Jan 2010 21:33 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
re-read the old stuff over and over again. Nothing annoys me more
than haveing to page through five generations of past messages in a
single thread to get all the way to the bottom just to have a single
line of text say something like Thank
Am Dienstag 12 Januar 2010 schrieb Alexander Duscheleit:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:07:19 +0100
Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Sonntag 10 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
On 01/10/2010 09:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Samstag 09 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
On
24 matches
Mail list logo
