On Sunday 13 June 2010 15:14:48 Allan McRae wrote:
> Fixed. This appears to be the only package that still had a mktemp dep.
Allan 1 - 0 Andrea
yes, it's the only one in our repos.
--
Andrea Scarpino - andreascarpino.it
KDE Maintainer in Arch Linux
On Sunday 13 June 2010 15:06:46 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> We should consider this a bug.
fixed with quilt 0.48-2
--
Andrea Scarpino - andreascarpino.it
KDE Maintainer in Arch Linux
On 13/06/10 23:03, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 13.06.2010 13:17, schrieb Allan McRae:
On 13/06/10 20:50, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 13.06.2010 12:43, schrieb Allan McRae:
Hi,
Do we have any guidelines on when to remove the
provides/conflic
Am 13.06.2010 15:03, schrieb Emmanuel Benisty:
> Just FTR:
>
> $ spacman -Su
> Password:
> :: Starting full system upgrade...
> warning: dmenu: local (4.1.1-1) is newer than extra (4.0-2)
> warning: firefox: local (3.7a6-1) is newer than extra (3.6.3-1)
> warning: procinfo-ng: local (2.0.304-2) is
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 13.06.2010 13:17, schrieb Allan McRae:
>> On 13/06/10 20:50, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>> Am 13.06.2010 12:43, schrieb Allan McRae:
Hi,
Do we have any guidelines on when to remove the
provides/conflicts/replaces arrays fr
On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 10:48 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:48:53 +1000
> Allan McRae wrote:
>
> > >>
> > >
> > > This is the reason why we need package signing for Pacman. I'm
> > > aware that some progress has been made and it's being worked on.
> > > Are there any updat
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
>
> This is the reason why we need package signing for Pacman. I'm aware
> that some progress has been made and it's being worked on. Are there
> any updates?
>
It's all there : http://projects.archlinux.org/users/allan/pacman.git/log/?h=
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:48:53 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
> >>
> >
> > This is the reason why we need package signing for Pacman. I'm
> > aware that some progress has been made and it's being worked on.
> > Are there any updates?
> >
>
> Yes... because package signing magically fixes all upstream
On 13/06/10 19:38, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:58:38 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 13.06.2010 02:33, schrieb Alexander Duscheleit:
OTOH the original mail was meant more to alert *users* of
unrealircd, the maintainer should actually already have been
noticed via the bug.
I
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:58:38 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 13.06.2010 02:33, schrieb Alexander Duscheleit:
> > OTOH the original mail was meant more to alert *users* of
> > unrealircd, the maintainer should actually already have been
> > noticed via the bug.
>
> In that case, it seems you cho
On 06/10/2010 05:20 PM, Gary Wright wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Axel Müller wrote:
>
>> I think it was about 1 1/2 year ago when there was a big fuss about some
>> Seagate drive models going bad because of a firmware bug. Seagate
>> provided a firmware update for these. If you haven
Am 13.06.2010 02:33, schrieb Alexander Duscheleit:
> OTOH the original mail was meant more to alert *users* of unrealircd,
> the maintainer should actually already have been noticed via the bug.
In that case, it seems you chose your list wisely.
> On a side-note, Sergej already has published a ne
12 matches
Mail list logo
