Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf kills update (conflicting file)

2010-09-01 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 23:35 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 09/01/2010 06:08 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > OK, I'm buying it. What you are telling me is that for 1X there was NO > dovecot.conf (IIRC it was something like dovecot.conf.example because I > compared > something to my suse dovecot.co

Re: [arch-general] Hard disc clicks

2010-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
On 09/01/2010 10:22 PM, Isaac Dupree wrote: On 09/01/10 00:25, Rafael Beraldo wrote: The thing is, 128 keeps the hard disc spinning down a lot. In fact, 254 is quite noiseless, but as from 253 the clicking sound returns. I read this bug page [3] but found nothing new. It is worth remembering tha

[arch-general] 2.6.35.4-1 still hangs waiting on udev with usbhid errors

2010-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, There are still usbhid-ups problem on boot that hang the boot and don't configure the usbhid-ups driver. This is a flakey issue. I have booted twice, hung the first time (errors below), rebooted and got by the udev/usbhid load in boot and upsmonitoring worked fine. The problem is, there

Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf kills update (conflicting file)

2010-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
On 09/01/2010 06:08 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:58 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: On 09/01/2010 08:59 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 07:44 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: but in any event, related or not, dovecot should update without failing due to the existing

Re: [arch-general] kde 4.5.1-1 looks much better.

2010-09-01 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On Thursday 02 September 2010 04:53:24 David C. Rankin wrote: > On 09/01/2010 01:46 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > > KDE is fancy, but snappy it is not. > > Funny, the windows side of the world found out that gigabyte desktops > aren't that snappy either. Wonder if there is a common thread. IMO KDE part

Re: [arch-general] Hard disc clicks

2010-09-01 Thread Isaac Dupree
On 09/01/10 00:25, Rafael Beraldo wrote: The thing is, 128 keeps the hard disc spinning down a lot. In fact, 254 is quite noiseless, but as from 253 the clicking sound returns. I read this bug page [3] but found nothing new. It is worth remembering that, sometimes, when I'm watching a movie or TV

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 21/48] Both rc.single and rc.shutdown use the same code to kill everything.

2010-09-01 Thread Kurt J. Bosch
2010-09-01 17:29, Victor Lowther: Bash globbing cannot handle it, but bash knows how to test file timestamps, so we could code something up that handles killing the daemons in reverse timestamp order if we had to. ls -l --full-time healthd fancontrol -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2010-09-02 00:51:

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 21/48] Both rc.single and rc.shutdown use the same code to kill everything.

2010-09-01 Thread Dave Reisner
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:53:20AM +0200, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > 2010-09-01 22:52, Dave Reisner: > >On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 07:30:45PM +0200, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > >>2010-09-01 13:03, Dave Reisner: > >>> > >>>The _current_ behavior doesn't define an order unless its in DAEMONS. > >>>I've reverted

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 21/48] Both rc.single and rc.shutdown use the same code to kill everything.

2010-09-01 Thread Kurt J. Bosch
2010-09-01 22:52, Dave Reisner: On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 07:30:45PM +0200, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: 2010-09-01 13:03, Dave Reisner: The _current_ behavior doesn't define an order unless its in DAEMONS. I've reverted _your_ behavior, which I don't feel has proper justification. I referred to extra

Re: [arch-general] kde 4.5.1-1 looks much better.

2010-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
On 09/01/2010 01:46 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: KDE is fancy, but snappy it is not. Funny, the windows side of the world found out that gigabyte desktops aren't that snappy either. Wonder if there is a common thread. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoc

Re: [arch-general] kde 4.5.1-1 looks much better.

2010-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
On 09/01/2010 12:59 PM, Robert Howard wrote: I noticed the wallpaper changer thing myself and think it's great to finally have that horrible dropdown list replaced with something decent. On the other hand, since the 4.5 update my Plasma-workspace process has crashed everytime I login to KDE via K

Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf kills update (conflicting file)

2010-09-01 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:58 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 09/01/2010 08:59 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 07:44 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > > > >> but in any event, related or not, > >> dovecot should update without failing due to the existing dovecot.conf > > > > > > T

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 21/48] Both rc.single and rc.shutdown use the same code to kill everything.

2010-09-01 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 07:30:45PM +0200, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > 2010-09-01 13:03, Dave Reisner: > > > >The _current_ behavior doesn't define an order unless its in DAEMONS. > >I've reverted _your_ behavior, which I don't feel has proper > >justification. > > > I referred to extras/initscripts whic

Re: [arch-general] kde 4.5.1-1 looks much better.

2010-09-01 Thread Ray Rashif
On 2 September 2010 01:59, Robert Howard wrote: > I noticed the wallpaper changer thing myself and think it's great to finally > have that horrible dropdown list replaced with something decent. On the > other hand, since the 4.5 update my Plasma-workspace process has crashed > everytime I login to

Re: [arch-general] kde 4.5.1-1 looks much better.

2010-09-01 Thread Robert Howard
I noticed the wallpaper changer thing myself and think it's great to finally have that horrible dropdown list replaced with something decent. On the other hand, since the 4.5 update my Plasma-workspace process has crashed everytime I login to KDE via KDM. It respawns 15 seconds later and works fine

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] mdadm-3.1.4-1

2010-09-01 Thread Dan McGee
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Two fixes related to configs that aren't using udev: >   - Don't remove md devices which 'standard' names on --stop >   - Allow dev_open to work on read-only /dev > And fixed regressions: >   - Allow --incremental to add spares to an array

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 21/48] Both rc.single and rc.shutdown use the same code to kill everything.

2010-09-01 Thread Kurt J. Bosch
2010-09-01 17:29, Victor Lowther: Bash globbing cannot handle it, but bash knows how to test file timestamps, so we could code something up that handles killing the daemons in reverse timestamp order if we had to. However, there is no reason to think that the order is significant for daemons not

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 21/48] Both rc.single and rc.shutdown use the same code to kill everything.

2010-09-01 Thread Kurt J. Bosch
2010-09-01 13:03, Dave Reisner: The _current_ behavior doesn't define an order unless its in DAEMONS. I've reverted _your_ behavior, which I don't feel has proper justification. I referred to extras/initscripts which indeed does. Please read the code: http://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts

[arch-general] kde 4.5.1-1 looks much better.

2010-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, Even from a kde4 hater, kde 4.5.1-1 is looking much better than prior releases. Way to go Arch on the packaging. It is starting to add some of the efficiencies k3 had that k4 has lacked. Simple case-in-point, just rt-click to change the desktop wp and you now have a clean 3 column thumb

Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf kills update (conflicting file)

2010-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
On 09/01/2010 08:59 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 07:44 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: but in any event, related or not, dovecot should update without failing due to the existing dovecot.conf The dovecot.conf file was created by you previously, hence why the update is failing.

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 28/48] Use bash-style conditionals when setting up the hardware clock.

2010-09-01 Thread Victor Lowther
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > On 2010-08-19 23:12, Victor Lowther wrote: >> >> On Aug 19, 2010 10:08 AM, "Kurt J. Bosch" >> wrote: >>> >>> On 2010-08-19 10:19, Jan de Groot wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 00:56 -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > > Couldn't we avo

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 21/48] Both rc.single and rc.shutdown use the same code to kill everything.

2010-09-01 Thread Victor Lowther
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > 2010-08-31 13:16, Dave Reisner: >> >> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:07:52AM +0200, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: >>> >>> --snip-- >>> >>> I suggest: >>> >>>  From b202be97f8dc1c0c68aaea792d4457c674c673f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Kurt J. Bosch >>

Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf kills update (conflicting file)

2010-09-01 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 07:44 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > but in any event, related or not, > dovecot should update without failing due to the existing dovecot.conf The dovecot.conf file was created by you previously, hence why the update is failing. The new dovecot package provides dovecot.

Re: [arch-general] dovecot.conf kills update (conflicting file)

2010-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
On 09/01/2010 07:44 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: Guys, The dovecot update needs to be fixed. Currently, on upgrade you get: checking package integrity... (288/288) checking for file conflicts [#] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) dov

[arch-general] dovecot.conf kills update (conflicting file)

2010-09-01 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, The dovecot update needs to be fixed. Currently, on upgrade you get: checking package integrity... (288/288) checking for file conflicts [#] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) dovecot: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf exists

[arch-general] KDE 4.5.1 Bug Kopete need much Memory

2010-09-01 Thread Carsten Feuls
Helly Everybody I have got a problem with Kopete extra/kdenetwork-kopete 4.5.1-1 [5,04 MB] (kde kdenetwork) [Installiert] Instant Messenger After I had update KDE 4.5.0 to KDE 4.5.1 my system becomes Slowly. Then i found out that my system has 890MB Ram in use and 800 MB Swap. Then I have

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 21/48] Both rc.single and rc.shutdown use the same code to kill everything.

2010-09-01 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 12:41:04PM +0200, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > 2010-08-31 13:16, Dave Reisner: > >On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:07:52AM +0200, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: > >>--snip-- > >> > >>I suggest: > >> > >> From b202be97f8dc1c0c68aaea792d4457c674c673f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >>From: Kurt J. Bosc

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH 21/48] Both rc.single and rc.shutdown use the same code to kill everything.

2010-09-01 Thread Kurt J. Bosch
2010-08-31 13:16, Dave Reisner: On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:07:52AM +0200, Kurt J. Bosch wrote: --snip-- I suggest: From b202be97f8dc1c0c68aaea792d4457c674c673f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kurt J. Bosch Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:57:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 17/17] Correct behaviour of kill_

Re: [arch-general] kde 4.5.1 ati/intel workarounds

2010-09-01 Thread Martín Cigorraga
I have both composite and raster enabled plasma desktop and apps running alongside very well here check it out. After just updating to 4.5.1 VSync was enabled again so I switched off. Best, -Martín "Un buen antivirus, no debería dejar cargar Windows y sugerir instalar GNU/Linux xD" - omar...@#pa