On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
wrote:
> On 2011/6/11 mwnn wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am unable to configure fonts on my new arch linux system. The
>> fonts from the old slackware installation are similar to
>> http://i.imgur.com/UcwHS.png. The new arch linux fonts look like
>> htt
On 2011/6/11 mwnn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am unable to configure fonts on my new arch linux system. The
> fonts from the old slackware installation are similar to
> http://i.imgur.com/UcwHS.png. The new arch linux fonts look like
> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/695/newemacs.jpg/
Hello,
You d
Hi,
I am unable to configure fonts on my new arch linux system. The
fonts from the old slackware installation are similar to
http://i.imgur.com/UcwHS.png. The new arch linux fonts look like
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/695/newemacs.jpg/
Regards,
mwnn
On Friday, June 10, 2011 23:36:18 C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mauro Santos
>
> wrote:
> > Arch users have lived without the last good known kernel so far and
> > without an -lts kernel until recently.
>
> this applies to technology in general -- we don't need any
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mauro Santos
wrote:
>
> Arch users have lived without the last good known kernel so far and
> without an -lts kernel until recently.
this applies to technology in general -- we don't need any of it, but
forward we move nonetheless.
> IMHO it is a lot more advisab
I can't help but notice that ArchLinux is using EveryDNS for its DNS server.
And since I also use EveryDNS DNS server, what is the plan for
ArchLinux domain administrator since EveryDNS users need to migrate to
Dyn by 31-Aug-2011?
Will the administrator use the paid service or something else?
I can't help but notice that ArchLinux is using EveryDNS for its DNS server.
And since I also use EveryDNS DNS server, what is the plan for
ArchLinux domain administrator since EveryDNS users need to migrate to
Dyn by 31-Aug-2011?
Will the administrator use the paid service or something else?
Am Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:21:17 -0400
schrieb "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" :
> Mind specifying for an idiot like me just which package-file-names
> I'd need to use with pacman -U to restore the previous kernel,
> complete with it's modules?
Try `ls /var/cache/pacman/pkg/kernel26*` and I guess you will f
Am Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:06:21 -0400
schrieb "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" :
> That wouldn't be such a bad idea. And in fact I already do that with
> the kernel and initrd image. But I'm almost ashamed to admit that I
> don't have enough understanding of the modules to know how to
> preserve and when nee
It would appear that on Jun 10, Heiko Baums did say:
> Am Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:48:57 +0200
> schrieb Vic Demuzere :
>
> > Having multiple kernels is insane. I don't get why it's needed. There
> > is a live cd to rescue your system if needed.
>
> And the old kernel packages (every package) are sa
It would appear that on Jun 10, Robert Howard did say:
> Why not just copy the old kernel image, modules and initrd image somewhere
> by hand before you upgrade kernels. If we try to make this automated it
> isn't going to be kiss. I used to do this way back in the day by including
> the entire k
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:38:29AM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > With the recent deprecation of net-tools I did notice some changes:
> >
> > - The binary 'hostname' now accepts remarkably few options,
> > specifically 'hostname -d' no lo
It would appear that on Jun 9, C Anthony Risinger did say:
> On Jun 9, 2011 5:50 PM, "Heiko Baums" wrote:
> > Am Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:36:21 -0500
> > schrieb C Anthony Risinger :
> >
> >> does this sound genius or completely insane? some insanely genius guy
> >> once said they are only separated b
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> With the recent deprecation of net-tools I did notice some changes:
>
> - The binary 'hostname' now accepts remarkably few options,
> specifically 'hostname -d' no longer works.
> - The command 'dnsdomainname' disappeared. (I'm not really
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:22:56AM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > 1. As I read it, it's only blacklisting that's affected, is that
> > correct?
>
> Correct.
>
> > So MODULES in rc.conf can in the future only be used t
With the recent deprecation of net-tools I did notice some changes:
- The binary 'hostname' now accepts remarkably few options,
specifically 'hostname -d' no longer works.
- The command 'dnsdomainname' disappeared. (I'm not really sure why I
ended up using it though, since 'hostname -d' would
Hi Magnus,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> 1. As I read it, it's only blacklisting that's affected, is that
> correct?
Correct.
> So MODULES in rc.conf can in the future only be used to load
> modules at boot-up.
Correct.
> (Is there even a way to configure mod
I just read about the changes to module blacklisting[1] and I'm left
wondering:
1. As I read it, it's only blacklisting that's affected, is that
correct?
So MODULES in rc.conf can in the future only be used to load
modules at boot-up. (Is there even a way to configure modprobe to
load
Arch users have lived without the last good known kernel so far and
without an -lts kernel until recently. IMHO it is a lot more advisable
to have an install cd/usb, or even better, a custom install in some
external media that can be used to boot the system in case something
goes wrong or in case o
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
>
> If noone has real objections, I hope to get this kernel into [core].
>
> Along with this the binary modules mentioned on the previous thread will be
> removed from [core] and [extra]:
> - tiacx (broken)
> - ndiswrapper (not needed anymo
Am 10.06.2011 17:09, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Hi guys,
please signoff 2.6.39 series for both arches.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
WARNING:
AUFS2 support is gone for now, if this is no showstopper we should go move it
to [core].
If noone has real objections, I hope
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Joker-jar wrote:
> /etc/conf.d/bridges (bridge-utils) still has old rc.conf example:
>
> # example:
> #
> # in /etc/rc.conf:
> # eth0="eth0 up"
> # eth1="eth1 up"
> # br0="br0 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 up"
> # INTERFACES=(lo eth0 eth1 br0)
> #
> # in /etc/
On 06/10/2011 10:29 PM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 10:21 PM, Richard Schütz wrote:
>> Am 10.06.2011 18:47, schrieb Madhurya Kakati:
>>> Hello,
>>> Recently mpd has stopped working. It doesn't start up at boot and when i
>>> run "rc.d start mpd" I get this error /etc/rc.d/mpd: line 6: 24
On 06/10/2011 10:21 PM, Richard Schütz wrote:
> Am 10.06.2011 18:47, schrieb Madhurya Kakati:
>> Hello,
>> Recently mpd has stopped working. It doesn't start up at boot and when i
>> run "rc.d start mpd" I get this error /etc/rc.d/mpd: line 6: 24502
>> Aborted /usr/bin/mpd /etc/mpd.
Am 10.06.2011 18:47, schrieb Madhurya Kakati:
Hello,
Recently mpd has stopped working. It doesn't start up at boot and when i
run "rc.d start mpd" I get this error /etc/rc.d/mpd: line 6: 24502
Aborted /usr/bin/mpd /etc/mpd.conf&>/dev/null.
I am using gnome3(if thats somehow causin
Hello,
Recently mpd has stopped working. It doesn't start up at boot and when i
run "rc.d start mpd" I get this error /etc/rc.d/mpd: line 6: 24502
Aborted /usr/bin/mpd /etc/mpd.conf &>/dev/null.
I am using gnome3(if thats somehow causing the problem.) I believe its
due to some ALSA
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:36 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
>> what if we (optionally) stored the original images _inside_ the new
>> one? the new/bad kernel would boot, and via some bootloader entry eg.
>> kernel param the new initcpio s
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Vic Demuzere wrote:
> On 10 June 2011 15:25, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
>> Also, I wonder what happens if power is lost whilst pacman is installing a
>> new
>> kernel? I haven't tried this, but it wouldn't surprise me if the system
>> ended
>> up with a truncated
Hi guys,
please signoff 2.6.39 series for both arches.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
WARNING:
AUFS2 support is gone for now, if this is no showstopper we should go move it
to [core].
If noone has real objections, I hope to get this kernel into [core].
Along with this
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Bogdan Ionuț wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 17:58, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Bogdan Ionuț wrote:
>> > same for rp-pppoe users.
>>
>> Please file a bug about the missing dependency.
>>
>> -t
>>
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 17:58, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Bogdan Ionuț wrote:
> > same for rp-pppoe users.
>
> Please file a bug about the missing dependency.
>
> -t
>
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24639
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote:
> wicd stop working if you uninstall net-tools. Just a warning to wicd users :)
Please file a bug about the missing dependency.
-t
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Bogdan Ionuț wrote:
> same for rp-pppoe users.
Please file a bug about the missing dependency.
-t
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:05 +0200, "Tom Gundersen" wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:51 PM, James Rayner
> wrote:
> > The only reason net-tools was still a requirement was setting hostname.
> > A change similar to initscripts [2] at line 121 of
> > src/connections/ethernet [3] would suffice.
>
>
On Friday 10 June 2011 15:13:07 Vic Demuzere wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I used to host a pacman repository on dropbox, for myself and a few
> friends. The easiest way for me to update this repo was Xyne's
> makerepo.
>
> That project isn't supported anymore, so I'm looking for an
> alternative. Somet
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 16:27, Ignacio Galmarino wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Am Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:01:15 -
> > schrieb "Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Tom Gundersen"
> > :
> >
> >> Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >>
> >> This April marked the ten year anniversary
On 10 June 2011 15:25, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> Also, I wonder what happens if power is lost whilst pacman is installing a new
> kernel? I haven't tried this, but it wouldn't surprise me if the system ended
> up with a truncated kernel that wouldn't boot. That's a bug right there,
> although it
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:01:15 -
> schrieb "Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Tom Gundersen"
> :
>
>> Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>
>> This April marked the ten year anniversary of the last net-tools
>> release. We decided to look at this as an oppor
On Friday 10 June 2011 14:03:32 Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Friday, June 10, 2011 04:26:21 Robert Howard wrote:
> > Why not just copy the old kernel image, modules and initrd image
> > somewhere by hand before you upgrade kernels. If we try to make this
> > automated it isn't going to be kiss. I used t
On Friday 10 June 2011 14:05:14 Yaro Kasear wrote:
> Another agreement from me here. Also, may I also add that a great deal of
> Arch users have /boot in a (tiny) partition to start with and can't really
> KEEP that much stuff in there? Keeping old kernels would definitely screw
> their systems up
Hi there,
I used to host a pacman repository on dropbox, for myself and a few
friends. The easiest way for me to update this repo was Xyne's
makerepo.
That project isn't supported anymore, so I'm looking for an
alternative. Something simple that can build and update a repository
(with AUR package
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:51 PM, James Rayner wrote:
> The only reason net-tools was still a requirement was setting hostname.
> A change similar to initscripts [2] at line 121 of
> src/connections/ethernet [3] would suffice.
What is the reason the hostname is set in netcfg? Do we ever want it
to
On Friday, June 10, 2011 05:48:57 Vic Demuzere wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2011 12:43 PM, "Martti Kühne" wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:36 AM, C Anthony Risinger
>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > what if we (optionally) stored the original images _inside_ the new
> > > one? the new/bad kernel would boo
On Friday, June 10, 2011 04:26:21 Robert Howard wrote:
> Why not just copy the old kernel image, modules and initrd image somewhere
> by hand before you upgrade kernels. If we try to make this automated it
> isn't going to be kiss. I used to do this way back in the day by including
> the entire ker
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 21:22:50 Timothy L. wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:25 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> > On Jun 9, 2011 5:50 PM, "Heiko Baums" wrote:
> > > Am Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:36:21 -0500
> > >
> > > schrieb C Anthony Risinger :
> > >> does this sound genius or completely insane?
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:19 +0200, "Rémy Oudompheng"
wrote:
> On 2011/6/9 Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> > Does netcfg still need net-tools? or can it be an opt depends? It was my
> > understanding that it only used ip unless specified otherwise.
>
> Actually, I think it only depends on net-tools because
Paul,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> I've found this gnawing at me since I read it. I originally started using
> OpenNTPD because it was smaller, lighter, and easier to configure. However,
> it's disappointing that it doesn't deal better with the hardware clock.
>
>
Am Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:48:57 +0200
schrieb Vic Demuzere :
> Having multiple kernels is insane. I don't get why it's needed. There
> is a live cd to rescue your system if needed.
And the old kernel packages (every package) are saved in pacman's cache
(usually /var/cache/pacman/pkg) anyway until pa
On Saturday 04 June 2011 08:44:34 Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 03:06 -0400, Yclept Nemo wrote:
> > Perhaps openntpd does not set the hwclock. Therefore, should openntpd
> > be used in conjuction with the hwclock daemon?
>
> That's true, and that's also the reason why Openntpd doesn'
On Jun 10, 2011 12:43 PM, "Martti Kühne" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:36 AM, C Anthony Risinger
wrote:
>
> > what if we (optionally) stored the original images _inside_ the new
> > one? the new/bad kernel would boot, and via some bootloader entry eg.
> > kernel param the new initcpio s
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:36 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> what if we (optionally) stored the original images _inside_ the new
> one? the new/bad kernel would boot, and via some bootloader entry eg.
> kernel param the new initcpio script would kexec the old kernel, with
> another (different)
Why not just copy the old kernel image, modules and initrd image somewhere
by hand before you upgrade kernels. If we try to make this automated it
isn't going to be kiss. I used to do this way back in the day by including
the entire kernel version in the pkgver and giving the images longer names.
I
> Fsck for btrfs seems to be a rather complicated for one person to study
and implement. Nevertheless I will consider it.
> Thank you Thomas.
>
I'm fairly certain that the btrfs fsck is being worked on already, but they
could probably use any help you could give them. There is also the project
to a
Cituji Thomas Dziedzic :
2011/6/9 Marek Otahal :
On Thursday 09 of June 2011 10:34:45 Luštický Josef wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm Josef Lusticky and I'd like to write a Bachelor thesis about
operating systems.
I'm student of Faculty of Information Technology in Brno, Czech
Republic and I have be
Cituji Thomas Dziedzic :
2011/6/9 Marek Otahal :
On Thursday 09 of June 2011 10:34:45 Luštický Josef wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm Josef Lusticky and I'd like to write a Bachelor thesis about
operating systems.
I'm student of Faculty of Information Technology in Brno, Czech
Republic and I have be
Cituji Yclept Nemo :
Also NILFS filesystem development is very slow and the project has a
long todo list including some gui tools.
Thanks for suggestion,
this sounds good to me. I will definitively look at NILFS.
Cheers.
Cituji Kirill Churin :
2011/6/9 Luštický Josef :
Hello everyone,
I'm Josef Lusticky and I'd like to write a Bachelor thesis about operating
systems.
I'm student of Faculty of Information Technology in Brno, Czech
Republic and I have been using Linux since 2006 and Archlinux since
2008.
I'm enth
2011/6/9 Luštický Josef :
> Hello everyone,
> I'm Josef Lusticky and I'd like to write a Bachelor thesis about operating
> systems.
> I'm student of Faculty of Information Technology in Brno, Czech
> Republic and I have been using Linux since 2006 and Archlinux since
> 2008.
> I'm enthuasistic user
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:17 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:25 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>
>> ... though i could very well be missing something obvious, certainly
>> wouldn't be the first time ...
>
> ... after 1/2 implementing this i suddenly realized a painful tru
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:25 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
> ... though i could very well be missing something obvious, certainly
> wouldn't be the first time ...
... after 1/2 implementing this i suddenly realized a painful truth
that's probably already been voiced ...
the kernel is *long-sinc
Thx, ss does exactly what i want.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On 9 June 2011 16:37, Wim Van Deun wrote:
>> Is there also an alternative to netstat ???
>
> ss :p
>
61 matches
Mail list logo
