Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Vasquez
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Pham Bao Trung wrote: > @Jonathan Vasquez > > I must say that I totally support your point of view. I have seen some > TU/devs/geeky users showed bad temper, mocking on newb at #archlinux who > really came there to seek for help and wanted to switch to Arch. They j

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Ross Hamblin
On 04/01/12 21:25, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > > Those are my worthless cents as well I suppose :). > Not so worthless I think. Is good to discuss this stuff in the open.

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Manne Merak
On 01/04/2012 01:53 AM, Vladimir Niks(ic' wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Manne Merak wrote: I have same flashplugin installed, same CPU, with Nvidia, high res 1920x1200 and fullscreen works fine. There are some oddities with this flash version. For example... http://www.youtube.com/wat

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
> That is strange.  I have KDE4 will effects (wife likes them ;) and it works > fine. > Long shot, but try adding: [...] Long shot... and miss. :)

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/03/2012 08:20 PM, Don Juan wrote: I am running Arch on a Toshiba Qosmio x505-q887. I have tried everything I can find online and in the wikis in setting things up but no matter what I have tried I can not get rid of the message in the logs, though my battery life seems semi reasonable, ro

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Manne Merak
On 01/04/2012 11:11 AM, Vladimir Nikšić wrote: That is strange. I have KDE4 will effects (wife likes them ;) and it works fine. Long shot, but try adding: [...] Long shot... and miss. :) mmm, what about running "xrestop" and checking again for an offending process. Manne

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Manne Merak
On 01/04/2012 11:11 AM, Vladimir Nikšić wrote: That is strange. I have KDE4 will effects (wife likes them ;) and it works fine. Long shot, but try adding: [...] Long shot... and miss. :) Also, these are the other Nvidia options that I have tweaked over the years. Not sure how many are stil

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Keits
On 11:21 Wed 04 Jan , Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > Splitting the thread (sorry I use gmail, so it won't split for you > guys on mutt or whatever)... Nah, it's fine for mutt.

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 04.01.2012 11:51, schrieb Manne Merak: > Also, these are the other Nvidia options that I have tweaked over the > years. Not sure how many are still valid. > > Section "Device" > ... > Option "RenderAccel" "True" > Option "TripleBuffer" "True" > Option "PixmapCacheSize" "30" > Option "OnDema

[arch-general] Seemingly archlinux specific problem with logkeys

2012-01-04 Thread SanskritFritz
I started a topic on the forum, but we didnt reach to any solution: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=129528 In hope for a more competent audience, I repost my question now here: It looks like there is an archlinux specific problem with logkeys: http://code.google.com/p/logkeys/issues/de

Re: [arch-general] Seemingly archlinux specific problem with logkeys

2012-01-04 Thread Scott Lawrence
On 01/04/2012 06:33 AM, SanskritFritz wrote: > I started a topic on the forum, but we didnt reach to any solution: > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=129528 > > In hope for a more competent audience, I repost my question now here: > > It looks like there is an archlinux specific problem

Re: [arch-general] Seemingly archlinux specific problem with logkeys

2012-01-04 Thread Dennis Herbrich
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:03:56AM -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote: > On 01/04/2012 06:33 AM, SanskritFritz wrote: > > I started a topic on the forum, but we didnt reach to any solution: > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=129528 > > > > In hope for a more competent audience, I repost my qu

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Ray Rashif
On 4 January 2012 16:25, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > Think of Doctors. Sometimes when you feel sick, you go online and you > try to do your due diligence. Trying to find out what is wrong with > you (Diagnosing yourself), even though you aren't a doctor. But you > try to do it anyways because search

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Peter Cannon
On 04/01/12 03:25, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: Carry on doing what *you* want not what others want you to do. I too joined "The pain of making tea." that is Arch Linux due to the statement that used to be on display; *Q)*When I run “pacman –sync” it comes up with “could not open sync database:rep

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Lorenzo Bandieri
> Think of Doctors. Sometimes when you feel sick, you go online and you > try to do your due diligence. Trying to find out what is wrong with > you (Diagnosing yourself), even though you aren't a doctor. But you > try to do it anyways because searching for information, and finding a > solution tend

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 05:52 AM, Lorenzo Bandieri wrote: Think of Doctors. Sometimes when you feel sick, you go online and you try to do your due diligence. Trying to find out what is wrong with you (Diagnosing yourself), even though you aren't a doctor. But you try to do it anyways because searching for

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Lorenzo Bandieri wrote: > > Ignorance should never be an excuse for a rude response, at least when > ignorance isn't accompanied by the obvious willingness to remain > ignorant. Epic quotation, coudn't agree more. And as Don said, I think that a Linux user doctor

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Angel Velásquez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/01/12 09:54, Peter Cannon wrote: > On 04/01/12 03:25, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > > Carry on doing what *you* want not what others want you to do. I > too joined "The pain of making tea." that is Arch Linux due to the > statement that used to be

Re: [arch-general] Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver

2012-01-04 Thread Martti Kühne
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:16:03PM +1100, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > > Even Angel's troll brings more signal to this discussion than your "I > have the same problem and no clue how to diagnose/fix it" messages... > ...And the first use of the word with T goes to... oh, wait a minute! That was good t

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Stefan Wilkens
2012/1/4 Angel Velásquez : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Again, as i've saying before, i don't know who the hell said that the > natural replacement of ubuntu is Arch .. out community is people who > like to read, and people who like to investigate .. not people who > like s

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > You are misunderstanding my goals and what I've said. > > I said that I'm trying to help people find and use Arch. Whether they > are expert users from other distros, or they are Noobies who are > "willing to read documentation". If a perso

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:25:40 -0500 Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > [...] > > Just because a person didn't go to > medical school, doesn't mean that they can research and learn anything > in the field of medicine. That logic is ridiculous, and as we have and > will experience in our lives, applies towar

[arch-general] Totem is broken by last libarchive update on testing.

2012-01-04 Thread Frederic Bezies
Hello. After I upgraded libarchive a few hours ago, I noticed totem was not working anymore. Reported bug #27824 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27824 And when I tried to build it using PKGBUILD : /usr/bin/ld: warning: libarchive.so.2, needed by /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.2/

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 08:14 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:25:40 -0500 Jonathan Vasquez wrote: [...] Just because a person didn't go to medical school, doesn't mean that they can research and learn anything in the field of medicine. That logic is ridiculous, and as we have and will exp

Re: [arch-general] Totem is broken by last libarchive update on testing.

2012-01-04 Thread Ionut Biru
On 01/04/2012 06:15 PM, Frederic Bezies wrote: > Hello. > > After I upgraded libarchive a few hours ago, I noticed totem was not > working anymore. > > Reported bug #27824 > > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27824 > > And when I tried to build it using PKGBUILD : > > /usr/bin/ld: warning: liba

[arch-general] archiso rebuild

2012-01-04 Thread gt
Hello folks I was wondering if there is a way to rebuild a custom live disc, using archiso, without having to download all the packages over again. The problem is that after making a few changes to the configuration, mainly inside root-image directory, i want to rebuild the iso. But, running bui

Re: [arch-general] [off-topic] Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver

2012-01-04 Thread Javier Vasquez
On 1/3/12, Angel Velásquez wrote: > ... > > OMG Javier did learn how to bottom-post! > > Congratulations \o/ > > - -- > Angel Velásquez I'm afraid the Javier you're referring to is another one, :-) I've seen a more active Javier on the list. I participate way less since though I have years usi

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Vladimir Nikšić
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 04.01.2012 11:51, schrieb Manne Merak: >> Also, these are the other Nvidia options that I have tweaked over the >> years. Not sure how many are still valid. >> >> Section "Device" >> ... >> Option "RenderAccel" "True" >> Option "TripleBuf

Re: [arch-general] [off-topic] Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver

2012-01-04 Thread Cédric Girard
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote: > I'm afraid the Javier you're referring to is another one, :-) Angel did confuse you with Jonathan Vasquez who still don't know how to bottom post. -- Cédric Girard

Re: [arch-general] Where Should I Report This?

2012-01-04 Thread Bastien Dejean
Thomas Bächler: > (Better idea: execute a wrapper that closes file descriptor 2, opens a > new one using pipe(), intercept everything that is printed to that pipe, > modify it and dump it to fd 1. That wrapper then executes your shell. > Much cleaner and more universal than a LD_PRELOAD hack.) Se

Re: [arch-general] Totem is broken by last libarchive update on testing.

2012-01-04 Thread fredbezies
2012/1/4 Ionut Biru > On 01/04/2012 06:15 PM, Frederic Bezies wrote: > > Hello. > > > > After I upgraded libarchive a few hours ago, I noticed totem was not > > working anymore. > > > > Reported bug #27824 > > > > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27824 > > > > And when I tried to build it using PK

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Manne Merak
On 01/04/2012 01:01 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 04.01.2012 11:51, schrieb Manne Merak: Also, these are the other Nvidia options that I have tweaked over the years. Not sure how many are still valid. Section "Device" ... Option "RenderAccel" "True" Option "TripleBuffer" "True" Option "PixmapCac

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Manne Merak
On 01/04/2012 06:35 PM, Vladimir Nikšić wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 04.01.2012 11:51, schrieb Manne Merak: Also, these are the other Nvidia options that I have tweaked over the years. Not sure how many are still valid. Section "Device" ... Option "RenderAc

[arch-general] System a bit broken pacman -Syu exists in filesystem

2012-01-04 Thread Lars Madson
Hi, My system has two hard drive, one SSD with / and /home/user on two partitions and a HDD mounted on /opt and /var. The HDD failed, and the system works with only the SSD as it was installed like this and then extended to the HDD. Only 3 or 4 weeks of update make a difference between the conte

[arch-general] Need a little help getting started with contributing

2012-01-04 Thread Göran Gustafsson
Hello everyone! I got a few small patches related to esthetical issues that i would like to send upstream so everyone else can enjoy them. I'm a little bit lost on how i should do this. The packages i've edited is initscripts, mkinitcpio and filesystem. When it comes to initscripts and mkinitcpio

Re: [arch-general] Need a little help getting started with contributing

2012-01-04 Thread Ionut Biru
On 01/04/2012 09:28 PM, Göran Gustafsson wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I got a few small patches related to esthetical issues that i would like > to send upstream so everyone else can enjoy them. I'm a little bit lost > on how i should do this. > > The packages i've edited is initscripts, mkinitcp

Re: [arch-general] System a bit broken pacman -Syu exists in filesystem

2012-01-04 Thread Florian Pritz
On 04.01.2012 20:23, Lars Madson wrote: > Hi, > > My system has two hard drive, one SSD with / and /home/user on two > partitions and a HDD mounted on /opt and /var. > > The HDD failed, and the system works with only the SSD as it was installed > like this and then extended to the HDD. > > Now I

Re: [arch-general] System a bit broken pacman -Syu exists in filesystem

2012-01-04 Thread Stefan Wilkens
2012/1/4 Florian Pritz : > On 04.01.2012 20:23, Lars Madson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> My system has two hard drive, one SSD with / and /home/user on two >> partitions and a HDD mounted on /opt and /var. >> >> The HDD failed, and the system works with only the SSD as it was installed >> like this and then

Re: [arch-general] Need a little help getting started with contributing

2012-01-04 Thread Florian Pritz
On 04.01.2012 20:33, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 01/04/2012 09:28 PM, Göran Gustafsson wrote: >> Also, does the filesystem package have a git repository i can use too? No, it's all in packages svn (ABS). >> Any help getting started would gladly be appreciated! :) > > send git format patches on arch-p

Re: [arch-general] System a bit broken pacman -Syu exists in filesystem

2012-01-04 Thread Florian Pritz
On 04.01.2012 20:51, Stefan Wilkens wrote: > 2012/1/4 Florian Pritz : >> On 04.01.2012 20:23, Lars Madson wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> My system has two hard drive, one SSD with / and /home/user on two >>> partitions and a HDD mounted on /opt and /var. >>> >>> The HDD failed, and the system works with on

Re: [arch-general] System a bit broken pacman -Syu exists in filesystem

2012-01-04 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:23:35 +0100 Lars Madson wrote: > Hi, > > My system has two hard drive, one SSD with / and /home/user on two > partitions and a HDD mounted on /opt and /var. > > The HDD failed, and the system works with only the SSD as it was installed > like this and then extended to the

Re: [arch-general] Need a little help getting started with contributing

2012-01-04 Thread Tom Gundersen
Hi Göran, 2012/1/4 Göran Gustafsson : > The packages i've edited is initscripts, mkinitcpio and filesystem. When > it comes to initscripts and mkinitcpio i've just cloned the git > repositories but i'm not sure how i should send the commits upstream. > git push doesn't work since i don't have the

Re: [arch-general] archiso rebuild

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Vasquez
On Jan 4, 2012 11:32 AM, "gt" wrote: > > Hello folks > > I was wondering if there is a way to rebuild a custom live disc, using > archiso, without having to download all the packages over again. > > The problem is that after making a few changes to the configuration, > mainly inside root-image dir

Re: [arch-general] [off-topic] Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Vasquez
On Jan 4, 2012 11:34 AM, "Javier Vasquez" wrote: > > On 1/3/12, Angel Velásquez wrote: > > ... > > > > OMG Javier did learn how to bottom-post! > > > > Congratulations \o/ > > > > - -- > > Angel Velásquez > > > I'm afraid the Javier you're referring to is another one, :-) I've > seen a more acti

Re: [arch-general] [off-topic] Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Vasquez
On Jan 4, 2012 3:27 PM, "Jonathan Vasquez" wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2012 11:34 AM, "Javier Vasquez" wrote: > > > > On 1/3/12, Angel Velásquez wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > OMG Javier did learn how to bottom-post! > > > > > > Congratulations \o/ > > > > > > - -- > > > Angel Velásquez > > > > > > I'm a

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Vasquez
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Don Juan wrote: > On 01/04/2012 08:14 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote: >> >> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:25:40 -0500 >> Jonathan Vasquez  wrote: >> >>> [...] >>> >>> Just because a person didn't go to >>> medical school, doesn't mean that they can research and learn anything >>>

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > That's how democracy works. By listening to it's citizens. > Same goes with the AUR, and when people vote for packages > for inclusion into the community repo Errr, no. It's still up to devs and TUs to include a package in the repos. Also

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Vasquez
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Jonathan Vasquez > wrote: >> That's how democracy works. By listening to it's citizens. >> Same goes with the AUR, and when people vote for packages >> for inclusion into the community repo > > Errr, no. It'

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Vasquez
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Karol Blazewicz > wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Jonathan Vasquez >> wrote: >>> That's how democracy works. By listening to it's citizens. >>> Same goes with the AUR, and when people vote for pa

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/01/12 07:14, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Karol Blazewicz > wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Jonathan Vasquez >> wrote: >>> That's how democracy works. By listening to it's citizens. >>> Same goes with the AUR, and when people vote for packages >>> for

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Vasquez
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 05/01/12 07:14, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Karol Blazewicz >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Jonathan Vasquez >>> wrote: That's how democracy works. By listening to it's citizens. Same

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Vasquez
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Allan McRae wrote: Are you sure TUs pay attention to votes (apart from the minimum required >> number)?  I always just pulled the packages I wanted... >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repos

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 01:04 PM, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Don Juan wrote: On 01/04/2012 08:14 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:25:40 -0500 Jonathan Vasquezwrote: [...] Just because a person didn't go to medical school, doesn't mean that they can resea

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 01:53 AM, Don Juan wrote: On 01/03/2012 08:20 PM, Don Juan wrote: I am running Arch on a Toshiba Qosmio x505-q887. I have tried everything I can find online and in the wikis in setting things up but no matter what I have tried I can not get rid of the message in the logs, though

[arch-general] Bluetooth Ralink

2012-01-04 Thread Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista
Hi, someone could help me with my bluetooth? Bus 007 Device 002: ID 148d:1000 Ralink Technology, Corp. Follow the steps in the link below,When I try to pair with any device not find anything https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bluetooth $hcitool scan Scanning ... $ #hcitool scan Scanning ...

Re: [arch-general] System a bit broken pacman -Syu exists in filesystem

2012-01-04 Thread Lars Madson
Well, the problem is actually caused by the /usr folder cause it's common to the old and recent /opt /var. So the old feel unsync with this too recent /usr folder and create conflict cause all the files are already there. The /opt /var will be simply updated if I understand right as the pacman dat

Re: [arch-general] Terrible flash performance

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 12:45 AM, Manne Merak wrote: On 01/04/2012 01:53 AM, Vladimir Niks(ic' wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Manne Merak wrote: I have same flashplugin installed, same CPU, with Nvidia, high res 1920x1200 and fullscreen works fine. There are some oddities with this flash versi

Re: [arch-general] Bluetooth Ralink

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 01:49 PM, Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista wrote: Hi, someone could help me with my bluetooth? Bus 007 Device 002: ID 148d:1000 Ralink Technology, Corp. Follow the steps in the link below,When I try to pair with any device not find anything https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bluet

Re: [arch-general] archiso rebuild

2012-01-04 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 04.01.2012 17:32, schrieb gt: > Hello folks > > I was wondering if there is a way to rebuild a custom live disc, using > archiso, without having to download all the packages over again. > > The problem is that after making a few changes to the configuration, > mainly inside root-image director

Re: [arch-general] Seemingly archlinux specific problem with logkeys

2012-01-04 Thread SanskritFritz
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Dennis Herbrich wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:03:56AM -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote: >> Huh. logkeys apparently does some stunny fuff with stdout >> (stdout=freopen(fname, "a", stdout) instead of just fopen'ing a new >> file) - changing that to be more "normal"

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Martti Kühne
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:45:43PM -0800, Don Juan wrote: > Battery 0: Discharging, 87%, 01:57:08 remaining > > That is all the output I get. Is there a file that is related to > discharge rate some place I can not find? Is this rate built into > the kernel? From what I read this is built in to th

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Peter Lewis
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 16:16:45 Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > > Never said the entire community was a democracy, I did say thought > > that like a democracy people vote for the packages to be included. > > You are right, that the Trusted Users have the final say on what > > packages get included, I n

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 00:14:42 +0100 Martti Kühne wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:45:43PM -0800, Don Juan wrote: > > Battery 0: Discharging, 87%, 01:57:08 remaining > > > > That is all the output I get. Is there a file that is related to > > discharge rate some place I can not find? Is this rat

Re: [arch-general] Bluetooth Ralink

2012-01-04 Thread Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista
Yes, i enable the device,yet it is not found Paulo Roberto Em 04/01/2012 19:05, "Don Juan" escreveu: > On 01/04/2012 01:49 PM, Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> someone could help me with my bluetooth? >> >> Bus 007 Device 002: ID 148d:1000 Ralink Technology, Corp. >> >> Follow

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 03:14 PM, Martti Kühne wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:45:43PM -0800, Don Juan wrote: Battery 0: Discharging, 87%, 01:57:08 remaining That is all the output I get. Is there a file that is related to discharge rate some place I can not find? Is this rate built into the kernel? Fr

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 03:30 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote: On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 00:14:42 +0100 Martti Kühne wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:45:43PM -0800, Don Juan wrote: Battery 0: Discharging, 87%, 01:57:08 remaining That is all the output I get. Is there a file that is related to discharge rate some pla

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Jason Melton
I don't know that it is directly relevant, but I have a Toshiba Qosimo X505-Q830, and I get (when plugged in and fully charged): [✍] /sys/class/power_supply/BAT1 $ cat uevent POWER_SUPPLY_NAME=BAT1 POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS=Full POWER_SUPPLY_PRESENT=1 POWER_SUPPLY_TECHNOLOGY=Li-ion POWER_SUPPLY_CYCLE

Re: [arch-general] Bluetooth Ralink

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 03:31 PM, Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista wrote: Yes, i enable the device,yet it is not found Paulo Roberto Em 04/01/2012 19:05, "Don Juan" escreveu: On 01/04/2012 01:49 PM, Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista wrote: Hi, someone could help me with my bluetooth? Bus 007 Device 002: ID

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 03:43 PM, Jason Melton wrote: I don't know that it is directly relevant, but I have a Toshiba Qosimo X505-Q830, and I get (when plugged in and fully charged): [✍] /sys/class/power_supply/BAT1 $ cat uevent POWER_SUPPLY_NAME=BAT1 POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS=Full POWER_SUPPLY_PRESENT=1 POW

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Jason Melton
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Don Juan wrote: > > do you know if changing the numbers in say VOLTAGE_NOW to match min on > mine would do anything? I know I can just try but is there something bad > that could happen? At least you have the same kernel message as me and > basically the same laptop

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 04:00 PM, Jason Melton wrote: On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Don Juan wrote: do you know if changing the numbers in say VOLTAGE_NOW to match min on mine would do anything? I know I can just try but is there something bad that could happen? At least you have the same kernel messag

Re: [arch-general] [off-topic] Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver

2012-01-04 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Jan 4, 2012 2:30 PM, "Jonathan Vasquez" wrote: > > There have been 12 posts I made in this thread, only 1 was top post because > it slipped my key stroke. While top posting is indeed annoying (I often waste my own time converting them to inline-style when replying, to preserve context), this t

Re: [arch-general] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Jason Melton
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Don Juan wrote: > On 01/04/2012 04:00 PM, Jason Melton wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Don Juan wrote: >> >>> >>> > Side note since you have a Qosmio as well have you ever tried messing with > DSDT on yours? > > Appreciate your time. > Nah, never mess

Re: [arch-general] Toshiba Qosmio [was] Battery question about a Firmware Bug in logs.

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 04:19 PM, Jason Melton wrote: On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Don Juan wrote: On 01/04/2012 04:00 PM, Jason Melton wrote: On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Don Juan wrote: Side note since you have a Qosmio as well have you ever tried messing with DSDT on yours? Appreciate

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Vasquez
On Jan 4, 2012 6:26 PM, "Peter Lewis" wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 16:16:45 Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > > > Never said the entire community was a democracy, I did say thought > > > that like a democracy people vote for the packages to be included. > > > You are right, that the Trusted Users h

Re: [arch-general] Newbies in Arch [WAS: Suspend seems not to work with nVidia Nouveau driver]

2012-01-04 Thread Don Juan
On 01/04/2012 05:11 PM, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: On Jan 4, 2012 6:26 PM, "Peter Lewis" wrote: On Wednesday 04 Jan 2012 16:16:45 Jonathan Vasquez wrote: Never said the entire community was a democracy, I did say thought that like a democracy people vote for the packages to be included. You are r

Re: [arch-general] System a bit broken pacman -Syu exists in filesystem

2012-01-04 Thread Lars Madson
This --force seems to do it perfectly, I'll take care. Thanks. Arch rules. Laurent 2012/1/4 Lars Madson > Well, the problem is actually caused by the /usr folder cause it's common > to the old and recent /opt /var. So the old feel unsync with this too > recent /usr folder and create conflict ca

Re: [arch-general] archiso rebuild

2012-01-04 Thread gt
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:05:25PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > In the official builds, the downloaded packages are always reused. I am > not intimitely familiar with the internals of archiso - you could > subscribe to the arch-releng list and post there, at least Gerardo reads > that list and wi

Re: [arch-general] archiso rebuild

2012-01-04 Thread gt
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:24:17PM -0500, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > I don't know how to rebuild the ISO, but for the meantime, you could back > up your > > /var/cache/pacman/pkg > > dir, since that is where your packages are stored. I hope that helps from > not having to redownload 500 MB again.