[arch-general] Which browser to use? [was: Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before]

Am 09.03.2017 um 04:49 schrieb Eli Schwartz via arch-general: On 03/08/2017 10:07 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Ok I understand, https://aur.archlinux.org/login/ is an insecure web site, since the issue mentioned by the OP happens with this login. However, for my taste it's not a problem to select

Re: [arch-general] Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:49:27 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >I cannot, in fact, explain what is insecure about >https://aur.archlinux.org/login/ but this is probably because it works >perfectly for me... > >You are dreaming. Please wake up. In 7 days the screenshot automatically gets

Re: [arch-general] Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before

On 03/08/2017 10:07 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Ok I understand, https://aur.archlinux.org/login/ is an insecure web > site, since the issue mentioned by the OP happens with this login. > However, for my taste it's not a problem to select the user name, > but this history problem is an issue for

Re: [arch-general] Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:46:49 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >On 03/08/2017 04:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 21:40:37 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >>> before latest update, firefox filled my login credentials >>> automatically into the appropriate fields. Now I've

Re: [arch-general] Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before

On 03/08/2017 04:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 21:40:37 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >> before latest update, firefox filled my login credentials >> automatically into the appropriate fields. Now I've first to select >> the user in a dropdown list - how can I revert this

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

On 03/08/2017 03:34 PM, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > Yes, I already wondered about this when looking at the PKGBUIL source > file, because it seemed a decision has been made against it, but the > subject is "How to "decorate" a package build?" - firefox has only been > a package which has been

Re: [arch-general] Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 21:40:37 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >before latest update, firefox filled my login credentials >automatically into the appropriate fields. Now I've first to select >the user in a dropdown list - how can I revert this behaviour? During the years Firefox made that much steps

Re: [arch-general] Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before

Hey, according to the Firefox 52 changelog [0] this only happens on "non-secure HTTP pages with logins". It's a feature and AFAIK there's no function to disable that. [0] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/52.0/releasenotes/ -- Stephan Am 08.03.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld: > >

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:02:24PM +0100, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote: > ... But there probably should be some TOS ... Why? Would a ToS be a legally binding document? If yes, it will constrain Arch, which is not good. If no, then it's just a meaningless text. I understand that companies

[arch-general] Firefox user data autofill doesn't work as before

Hello, before latest update, firefox filled my login credentials automatically into the appropriate fields. Now I've first to select the user in a dropdown list - how can I revert this behaviour? Kind regards Peter

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 21:02:24 +0100 Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote: > On 8 March 2017 at 20:57, Neven Sajko wrote: > > This discussion is pointless without legal advice. Without it > > disclosing user information (even if it is public) does not

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

Am 08.03.2017 um 15:34 schrieb Doug Newgard: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:48:14 +0100 Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Thank You, I'll try that! Regards P. You do realize that firefox is now built with alsa support in the repos, right? Yes, I already wondered about this when

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

On 8 March 2017 at 20:57, Neven Sajko wrote: > This discussion is pointless without legal advice. Without it > disclosing user information (even if it is public) does not seem like > such a good idea. Not that I advocate paying a lawyer just for this issue, it would be simpler

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

This discussion is pointless without legal advice. Without it disclosing user information (even if it is public) does not seem like such a good idea.

Re: [arch-general] What's the best way of packaging golang packages?

On 17-03-09 00:13:59, Iru Cai via arch-general wrote: > Go programs are compiled to a single binary that do not link > to other go libraries, so they doesn't depend on other go packages. You answered your question here, haven't you? > I'm also confused when I see node.js packages. I see many of

[arch-general] What's the best way of packaging golang packages?

Hi, I'm not familiar with go, but I'm trying to use some go programs, caddy for example. I read the PKGBUILD of it. It first use `go get' to get the dependencies and then do the `go build'. However, I don't think it a good practice. I'm used to the way of installing the dependency packages

Re: [arch-general] hcidump is missing?

On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:19:33 + Алексей Трофимов via arch-general wrote: > I try to dump bluetooth traffic to find audio codecs my wireless headphones > support -- > http://askubuntu.com/questions/425333/how-to-make-aptx-capable-bluetooth-equipment-work-with-ubuntu

Re: [arch-general] hcidump is missing?

2017-03-08 16:19 GMT+01:00 Алексей Трофимов via arch-general : > I try to dump bluetooth traffic to find audio codecs my wireless headphones > support -- > http://askubuntu.com/questions/425333/how-to-make-aptx-capable-bluetooth-equipment-work-with-ubuntu > > But it

[arch-general] hcidump is missing?

I try to dump bluetooth traffic to find audio codecs my wireless headphones support -- http://askubuntu.com/questions/425333/how-to-make-aptx-capable-bluetooth-equipment-work-with-ubuntu But it looks like I have no hcidump installed. command-not-found says: hcidump may be found in the

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:48:14 +0100 Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > Thank You, I'll try that! > > Regards > P. You do realize that firefox is now built with alsa support in the repos, right?

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:30:25 +0100, ProgAndy wrote: >Ralf has a good idea, I would change it a bit and do it like this: > >#!/bin/bash ># 1) set pacman to ignore firefox upgrades ># 2) perform normal pacman upgrade >sudo pacman -Syu ># 3) continue this script > ># pacman should still recognize that

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

On 03/08/2017 06:04 AM, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > I've found out I could probably use PreTransaction-Hooks, but I cannot > see, when exactly the hook is executed: before download, after download, > or after unpacking. This makes no sense, hooks are part of a transaction and by definition cannot

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

Am 08.03.2017 um 12:30 schrieb ProgAndy: Am 08.03.2017 um 12:20 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld: Thank You! However, while one part is about Firefox, the other is about changing builds while still getting the signalling for new builds from pacman. One possibility seems to use Hooks, while I'm not yet

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:55 AM, ProgAndy wrote: > Am 08.03.2017 um 11:45 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld: > >> >> Hello, >> >> is it possible to decorate a package build, i.e. set some prconditions >> (like exporting variables) and probably even change the build process >> (compile

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

Am 08.03.2017 um 12:20 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld: Thank You! However, while one part is about Firefox, the other is about changing builds while still getting the signalling for new builds from pacman. One possibility seems to use Hooks, while I'm not yet sure how to use them correctly.

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

Am 08.03.2017 um 12:02 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:45:37 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: is it possible to decorate a package build, i.e. set some prconditions (like exporting variables) and probably even change the build process (compile instead of copying just the binaries)?

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

PS: >This isn't worth the effort, however... > >1. disable updating the firefox package: > >/etc/pacman.conf >IgnorePkg = firefox > >2. write a wrapper for pacman that first compares the installed > version, with the version provided by the repositories > >pacman -Q firefox | cut -d\ -f2

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

Am 08.03.2017 um 11:55 schrieb ProgAndy: Am 08.03.2017 um 11:45 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld: Hello, is it possible to decorate a package build, i.e. set some prconditions (like exporting variables) and probably even change the build process (compile instead of copying just the binaries)? E.g.,

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:45:37 +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: >is it possible to decorate a package build, i.e. set some prconditions >(like exporting variables) and probably even change the build process >(compile instead of copying just the binaries)? > >E.g., to modify the firefox package update

Re: [arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

Am 08.03.2017 um 11:45 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld: Hello, is it possible to decorate a package build, i.e. set some prconditions (like exporting variables) and probably even change the build process (compile instead of copying just the binaries)? E.g., to modify the firefox package update to

[arch-general] How to "decorate" a package build?

Hello, is it possible to decorate a package build, i.e. set some prconditions (like exporting variables) and probably even change the build process (compile instead of copying just the binaries)? E.g., to modify the firefox package update to first compile with "--enable-alsa". Of course, I

Re: [arch-general] Linux LTS 4.4 continued or 4.9 coming soon?

The problem I'm having with 4.9 so far is that I'm running an Arch in a VirtualBox guest on Windows and after upgrading to 4.9, the VirtualBox guest additions couldn't compile (for both linux and linux-lts). On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Barry Fishman wrote: > > On