On 04/07/12 00:43, Dave Reisner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 06:42:09AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On the flip side, most custom kernel users should be more savvy than the
average, do I don't see much of a problem. I maintain two aur kennels,
shall I implement the move now (seems like it'd work
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Dedicated to the relatively-closed and more-constrained version of whats
in the repos. Sure =)
The distros have jumped fast, but I'm wondering about the Windows users
of openoffice, seems to me none of them would try libreoffice just
because its there (and frankly the
Baho Utot wrote:
This gives me an error
/build/PKGBUILD: line 25: cd: /trinity.source/kdepim: Too many levels
of symbolic links
I want to symlink the svn repo to inside the chroot so when
makechrootpkg -c -r chrootdir creates the clean copy it doesn't have
to copy the entire svn source
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
- bump to latest version
greetings
tpowa
X still broken :(
Ivan S. Freitas wrote:
I would be grateful for feedback to help improve the quality of the
document and if possible help testing that my experience was not a
fluke.
After adding the user in the uucp group, is rebooting really
necessary? I think that a logout/login would be enough.
Even a
MartÃn Cigorraga escribió:
Thanks for your quick answer.
@cantabile, @Dave
Since I didn't upgraded core/filesystem package I have no issues with
makepkg and FF.
In fact I already installed Dropbox by downloading the PKGBUILD
and the rest of the files and running makepkg as usual and even
Christian Larsson wrote:
I know it doesn't adress the problem with flash, but are a side note. Most
of us only use flash in order to view flash videos, an most of the time we
also would like to download them. For this ytmp (
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40172) is a great
Ananda Samaddar wrote:
I notice it's all under GFDL 1.2. I'm wanting to use a Gentoo doc
for the Arch Security stuff but it's under a CC-SA attribution license
which is incompatible with GFDL. Would it be possible to allow Wiki
content under a CC licenses? I can't see it being too
David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm usually quite good at one-liners, but my simple ones no longer work
in
Arch. Same cli works fine in suse. What have I messed up? To wit:
What could keep the simple cli from working on Arch? I know this stuff
worked
before updates this
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Under which circunstances would you envision the need to trust an old,
compromised signature?
New install, dev for a coupl of [extra] packages has already left the
team. Having to recompile everytime a dev leaves the team is additional
(unnecessary) hassle IMO,
Piyush P Kurur wrote:
Hi,
We have configured a set of machines to authenticate
against an LDAP database. For some machines we do not want the
users to login via their normal shell but some custom program
runs for them. For example if some one tries to login to the
smtp server via ssh,
Seems my message didn't get through.
It was just doing
rc() { /etc/rc.d/$*; }
And to get completion,
complete -o filenames -W $(cd /etc/rc.d/ echo *) rc
That requires a relogin / sourcing the profile again to update
the completion (could be avoided with another function) but
it's neat and
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:12:15PM +0200, Linas wrote:
If your main problem is to create playlists for a recursive music tree,
I guess that
this would work with pretty much all players:
find /path/to/music music-list.m3u
$PLAYER music-list.m3u
Damien Churchill wrote:
I've got a rather confusing issue with man. Whenever I try and view a
man page I just end up with a blank screen.
http://www.imagebam.com/image/41dd5973332829
This occurs for any page, even for local ones. I was wondering if
anyone would be able to shed any light on
On 18/03/10 12:52, Mauro Santos wrote:
On 03/18/2010 09:10 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
0xf, 5, Who cares which it's called? As long as it contains the logical
partitions... But the ending sector thing will bug me if I don't fix it.
So for my piece of mind I'm gonna have to do
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
Any way I only mention it because When I got around to installing Arch on
one of the two partitions I recovered from Sabayon, I skipped the
installation step of letting cfdisk touch my partitions and simply selected
the partition I previously prepared for it with
I had already this email draft in my head, but Ananda 'Arch Linux
security is still poor' thread, on which the point was also brought up,
moved me to really write it.
First off, there's an implicit level of trust on the package software,
no matter which OS you use.
When using Windows, you
Peter Cannon wrote:
pacman -Si xfce|less
and looked for a package that might get me to a minimal desktop I could work
with.
I thought maybe xfdesktop...
pacman -S xfdesktop
Why have you done this? If you look at the 'man' page you will see
http://linux.die.net/man/1/xfdesktop
Xavier Chantry wrote:
The tiny size of the reopen textbox does not give a lot of freedom for
justifications either.
I think this is completely missing the point though. I don't
understand why Dan is the only developer who sees that it sometimes
makes sense to provide additional information on
Carlos Mennens wrote:
Yes I am very familiar with that Wiki article but find Swap on RAID is
useless, no? For my scenario I was going to do the following and
please correct me if you think this is wrong:
It is useful if you want to continue running the system even with a
failed disk
Byron Clark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:32:15AM -0700, Byron Clark wrote:
if pidof sshd | grep -q $(cat /var/run/sshd.pid); then
echo pid in /var/run/sshd.pid is valid
else
echo invalid pid
fi
Ignore that, it isn't entirely safe.
You may want grep -q ^$(cat
Byron Clark wrote:
Unfortunately that only works if there is only one sshd process returned
by pidof. Here's the case I'm worried about:
/var/run/sshd.pid: 343
pidof sshd: 3433
And the case where add ^$ around the pid breaks:
/var/run/sshd.pid: 343
pidof sshd: 343 2452 2453
Yes
Aaron Griffin wrote:
However, this is a mailing list. Not everyone is aware of the state
of the list at any given time. It's best to bottom post and only
reference relevant material so that even someone coming upon the 15th
email in a chain is able to read just that email and understand it for
23 matches
Mail list logo
