605b9)
#12 0x5617386dd8c8 n/a
(Xorg + 0x398c8)
#13 0x7ff15b17d152
__libc_start_main (libc.so.6 + 0x28152)
#14 0x5617386de5ae
_start (Xorg + 0x3a5ae)
Yaro
signatur
vious config
versions, just what is on the filesystem now and what's new.
Sorry about that, I was wrong.
Yaro
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:32 PM Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:17 PM Archange wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 20/08/2020 à 00:04, Yaro Kasear a écrit :
>> > On 8/19/20 2:56 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
>> >> On 8/19/20 2:48 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-g
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:17 PM Archange wrote:
>
> Le 20/08/2020 à 00:04, Yaro Kasear a écrit :
> > On 8/19/20 2:56 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> >> On 8/19/20 2:48 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote:
> >>> Em agosto 19, 2020 16:37 Yaro Kasear escreveu:
On 8/19/20 2:56 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On 8/19/20 2:48 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote:
>> Em agosto 19, 2020 16:37 Yaro Kasear escreveu:
>>> I've always questioned the wisdom of dropping a .pacnew just when the
>>> file is different from the defau
On 8/19/20 2:48 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote:
> Em agosto 19, 2020 16:37 Yaro Kasear escreveu:
>>
>> I've always questioned the wisdom of dropping a .pacnew just when the
>> file is different from the default. There's really no reason for it
>
package handles configs happened.
All most pacnew files wind up doing is sitting there for thirty seconds
before being deleted without anyone even opening them because they're
literally just what the file was before the user ALREADY changed it
before... because it's utterly useless to get a default config file when
you've intentionally changed it and there's nothing in the new version
of the package that calls for an examination of the defaults.
Yaro
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 6/2/20 1:09 PM, Kusoneko wrote:
> On June 2, 2020 5:58:51 PM UTC, Hanipaganda via arch-general
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>>
>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>> On Tuesday, June 2, 2020 9:10 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
>&
On 6/2/20 12:58 PM, Hanipaganda via arch-general wrote:
>
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Tuesday, June 2, 2020 9:10 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
>
>> On 6/2/20 3:49 AM, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
>>
>&
ove source?
>
The fact this user used the term "globalist" should really tell you all
you need to know about them. That's a conservative dog-whistle term for
"Jew" and is usually spewed by people who listen to garbage like Alex
Jones unironically.
Yaro
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
;t like it, then just don't sit around staring at it.
Also, in the sort of places that would cause serious harm for someone to
support LGBT+ rights Arch already has a number of packages that they
would already not want people to use. Just saying.
Yaro
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 3/7/20 11:21 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 3/7/20 11:53 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
>>> Thanks for your reply. If I put this in a bash script, will it reset once
>>> the script is done running?
>>>
>> I suspect it will if you drop the 'expor
On 3/7/20 10:51 PM, karx via arch-general wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 9:59 PM Yaro Kasear wrote:
>
>> On 3/7/20 9:53 PM, karx via arch-general wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 9:50 PM Neven Sajko wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have not fully understood your situa
d much rather use a version
> management system rather than risk messing up the system python. Basically,
> what I am asking is, can I get reflector to work with pyenv?
>
You could just change PATH for the one terminal with an 'export
PATH=/usr/bin:$PATH'
That wouldn't affect PATH for any other sessions...
Yaro
to just accept
what you say. That's not the same thing. Respect means you can take
disagreement without blocking them or posting a Youtube video that's one
half boring and one half petulant whining about your treatment.
Yaro
thread
going nowhere from the start.
Your proposal has little rationale given to justify your ideas, at least
one of your ideas already conflicts with existing guidelines, and one of
your ideas is startlingly bad security practice nobody should follow.
Yaro
JFS outside of backwards
compatibility
support for older IBM systems? It bewilders me that it was in the
original base group,
honestly.
Yaro
> alone?
>
There are multiple kernels officially supported. Vanilla, lts, zen, hardened,
etc.
So it probably was left out of base because they didn't want to force people to
take the extra step of changing kernels.
Yaro
x, I believe both work with mdadm. BIOS RAID is
only worth using if you plan to share the array with another OS, though,
like Windows.
Yaro
On Sun, 2019-01-13 at 22:31 -0500, brent s. wrote:
> On 1/13/19 10:19 PM, brent s. wrote:
> > > Well, unencrypted partition table. What he wants is an encrypted
> > > partition table, and more generally no metadata available (so the
> > > disk
> > > just looks like plain garbage, not x nice labelle
On 10/24/2017 08:53 PM, L. Rose wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to setup a couple of drives using RAID10 with mdadm. On top of
> /dev/md0, I want to setup one large dmcrypt/LUKS encrypted ext4 volume.
> As Arch wiki reads, this seems to be possible. But what about expanding
> that volume later on
I have found it sometimes helps to mount the "Microsoft Reserved" or
"Microsoft System" partition before running grub-mkconfig. The os-prober
package can be really dimwitted sometimes when it comes to doing scans on
its own like that.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-gene
. Nothing's stopping
you. But stopping filling this list with nonsense and your personal
problems with the developers of projects Arch has nothing to do with.
Yaro
On 11/27/2016 08:18 PM, Merlin Büge wrote:
Where is /boot physically located? Can grub2 boot from LV these days?
/boot is physically located on my only storage drive in the laptop.
It's not a seperate partition, just on the Btrfs filesystem.
Can grub2 boot from LV these days?
I don't know (
On 11/27/2016 08:09 PM, Merlin Büge wrote:
Hi Yaro,
thanks for your answer!
I'd set up two partitions: Your EFI system partition and the LUKS
container. Then inside LUKS, format the whole thing as LVM and then set
up from there, rather than make the LUKS container another GPT "d
VG, that way you could grow the whole thing across multiple disks
pretty easily without having to make any dramatic changes. I know btrfs
can do multiple disks, but I've always preferred how LVM does it, honestly.
Yaro
Consider also that getting PowerShell doesn't solve the "how do I"
problem. People who don't know PS would still have to look up how to do
the same thing on there. If you're already familiar with Linux, and
chances are you are if you're using Archlinux, then PowerShell won't
solve any problems
On Sat, 2016-02-13 at 13:47 +0100, Carsten Mattner wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:49 AM, PeLo L wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I've followed the arch wiki and deployed a full disk encrypted
> > install.
> > Everything works fine and am able to boot properly into the
> > install.
> > While
I still don't get what makes OpenRC so great. Doesn't it still depend
entirely on SysV Init? That ALONE makes me want to keep it off my system.
If it makes us fall back on an init system that is frankly backward and was
badly in need of replacement then I don't see why it should be considered
an al
It seems like bad form to enable unstable features for a package in
[extra]. Shouldn't it be set to enable the GTK2 VCL by default?
Yaro
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 11:51 +0800, mudongliang wrote:
>
> On 10/13/2015 11:38 AM, Jens Adam wrote:
> > Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:29:18 +080
I can't overtly fault the logic in that blog post for the most part.
However he does still basically toe the "Unix philosophy" line (Talking
about modularity and such.)
The thing that bothers me most about this document though is how he
dismisses systemd's legitimate, if not unique, features as "p
On Jul 3, 2015 6:10 AM, "LoneVVolf" wrote:
>
> Some general comments :
>
> - Openrc is a replacement for sysv init, not an addition.
>
OpenRC runs on SysV Init last I checked, as OpenRC is just highly polished
initscripts. How is that a replacement instead of an addition?
> - openrc has it's own
I personally prefer systemd over the alternatives. I grant there's
considerable feature creep, but the people who complain a lot either don't
offer an alternative, or the one alternative they offer is the frankly
broken system Linux had been using since the dawn of time.
I wouldn't mind some spiri
On 01/01/2015 10:41 AM, Rich wrote:
On 01/01/2015 10:27 AM, Troy Engel wrote:
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Geoff wrote:
Not intending to contradict, but rebuilding cower worked for me. I
used a
clean tarball and did makepackage --skipinteg (see the discussion
under cower
in the AUR)
On 07/16/2014 02:50 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> What's the meaning of this [1]?
>
> Regards,
> Ralf
>
> [1]
> $ bacman ardour
> ==> Entering fakeroot environment
> ==> Package: ardour-2.8.16-1
> -> Copying package files...
> etc/: Failed to set file flags
> bsdtar: Error exit delayed from previous
On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 05:29:11 PM Neal Oakey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is an Bug(1) in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and as far as I'm informed this has
> only been patched in 1.0.1g.
> Many other Distributions have build there own patch, what is with us?
> Currently we have "1.0.1.f-2" which is effected as far
On Monday, March 10, 2014 10:13:39 AM Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> On Friday 07 Mar 2014 15:09:27 Ary Kleinerman wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a new Archer and I'm planning to install arch linux in a production
> > server environment, but I have doubts because Arch is a rolling release.
> > My
> > question i
I don't know what the change is, but the problem affects me as well. I hook my
laptop up to a monitor at work and close it. Until I get to my KDE desktop
(Which is configured not to suspend if the lid is closed if the laptop is
plugged in.) it'll pull itself out when I press a button, then imme
On 12/31/2012 11:07 AM, Jack Stanek wrote:
Hello all,
I've been having problems with ALSA recently. Whenever I reboot my computer or
wake it up from sleep, ALSA sets the volume of the speakers (and only the
speakers) to zero. The headphones and master volume remain normal, but no sound
will co
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 01:11:22 PM Kyle wrote:
> Apple devices stopped looking appealing to me when people around me
> started getting them and I found out how much control Apple has over
> what people do with their devices, especially i-devices, iPod, iPad,
> iPhone, etc. And now that they hav
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:31:56 PM Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> Hi,
> After a recent system upgrade fbsplash fails to run during boot. However
> while shutting down i can see the splash. Its only during the start up
> that I can't see it.
> This is the /var/log/boot some days before the upgrade
> ht
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 07:56:25 PM Bernardo Barros wrote:
> here too :-)
+700 on this.
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 06:08:03 PM Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:33:50 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> > > > Please welcome Dave to our d
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:33:50 PM Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> > Please welcome Dave to our development team. He has been a frequent
> > contributor (and reviewer of patches!) to Pacman, has been a TU for a
> > little bit, and has taken initiative on a
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 04:23:45 PM Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> netcfg 2.6 has been released and pushed in [testing].
>
> The following features has been added since the last release:
> - add support for IPv6 configuration (FS#18699)
> - add support for static routes configuration (FS#18
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 11:59:00 AM Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> On 06/19/2011 10:13 PM, Mauro Santos wrote:
> > Really silly questions:
> > - Are you using any repos other than [core], [extra], [community] and
> > [multilib]?
> > - Are you using any pacman wrappers?
> >
> > I'm asking because pacman
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 04:57:07 AM Richard Schütz wrote:
> Am 18.06.2011 11:29, schrieb Martti Kühne:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Richard Schütz
wrote:
> >> Am 18.06.2011 09:08, schrieb Dan Vratil:
> >> I don't think so. Epiphany is based on WebKit these days. And because I
> >> can
On Friday, June 17, 2011 05:35:06 PM Martti Kühne wrote:
>
>
> >>> Are we sure ths is a bug with the nVidia driver? Can someone load that
> >>> image
> >>> who isn't using it?
>
> confirming display screwage with firefox on an onboard nvidia chip. nasty.
> 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVid
On Friday, June 17, 2011 04:10:01 PM Richard Schütz wrote:
> The new driver really seems to have a major problem. I figured out that
> you just need an image with 2047px width to screw up the driver.
>
>
> ATTENTION: This can crash your X server and corrupt memory!
>
> Example: [1], an otherwise
On Friday, June 17, 2011 12:55:01 PM Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 08:46 PM, Pico Geyer wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As the title of this email suggests I'm having trouble with the new
> > Nvidia driver.
> > I've attached my Xorg log, as I'm sure that there are a log of people
> > who understand
On Friday, June 10, 2011 23:36:18 C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mauro Santos
>
> wrote:
> > Arch users have lived without the last good known kernel so far and
> > without an -lts kernel until recently.
>
> this applies to technology in general -- we don't need any
On Friday, June 10, 2011 05:48:57 Vic Demuzere wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2011 12:43 PM, "Martti Kühne" wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:36 AM, C Anthony Risinger
>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > what if we (optionally) stored the original images _inside_ the new
> > > one? the new/bad kernel would boo
On Friday, June 10, 2011 04:26:21 Robert Howard wrote:
> Why not just copy the old kernel image, modules and initrd image somewhere
> by hand before you upgrade kernels. If we try to make this automated it
> isn't going to be kiss. I used to do this way back in the day by including
> the entire ker
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 21:22:50 Timothy L. wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:25 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> > On Jun 9, 2011 5:50 PM, "Heiko Baums" wrote:
> > > Am Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:36:21 -0500
> > >
> > > schrieb C Anthony Risinger :
> > >> does this sound genius or completely insane?
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 05:31:06 Paul Gideon Dann wrote:
> On Thursday 09 June 2011 00:04:09 Heiko Baums wrote:
> > schrieb Oon-Ee Ng :
> > > Such a patch would also have to copy the modules (which aren't under
> > > kernel26's 'purview'). For example, nvidia gets upgraded on a major
> > > versi
On Monday, June 06, 2011 11:34:53 Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Tavian Barnes
>
> wrote:
> > On 6 June 2011 10:02, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> Since the next kernel will be 3.0 , the kernel26 naming is
> >> meaningless from the next kernel. I think th
On Monday, June 06, 2011 07:39:03 Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
> Thanks Tom for taking your time to answer,
> I will follow your advises to try to stabilize my system. I will try
> to downgrade my system also. If I see that this helps I will let you
> know, just in case this is a bug an not a simpl
On Thursday, May 26, 2011 02:57:49 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 26.05.2011 06:28, schrieb XeCycle:
> > Perhaps we may provide alternative kernels? With names like
> > these, we may get a brand new project named "Arch Operating
> > System", providing Linux, BSD, Hurd or even more as kernels,
> > and u
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:14:55 Sander Jansen wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Bächler
wrote:
> > Am 25.05.2011 17:43, schrieb jesse jaara:
> >> This is from recent kerbel mailing list post. A voice inside Torvals
> >> head is telling hin that it would be time to go for 3.0 v
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:20:46 Bernardo Barros wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
> going to be 3.0.
> Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
> modify it anyway.
> Why not just 'linux 3.0'? Just an idea.. since
On Monday, May 09, 2011 14:46:11 Steve Holmes wrote:
> Thanks for telling me about the desktop being gone. I really wondered
> and am a bit surprised as I thought most people valued and used a
> desktop area quite a bit. Yes, I opened up my home directory from the
> places and then opened the des
On Monday, May 09, 2011 12:53:55 Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 09-05-2011 18:45, Filip Filipov wrote:
> >> [...] from what i see accessibility, is broken a lot in gnome 3 and i
> >> hope they will fix that in 3.2
> >
> > A little bit off-topic, but how often is the 'Fun statistics' [1]
> > changing .
On Saturday, May 07, 2011 22:46:29 Jonathan Beatty wrote:
> On 05/07/2011 12:33 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > and most Linux users don't give a damn if something is
> > "nonfree."
>
> That's precisely part of the problem. You are walking blindly into
> pa
On Saturday, May 07, 2011 12:26:54 Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> Excerpts from C Anthony Risinger's message of 2011-05-07 18:24:38 +0200:
> > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Pierre Schmitz
wrote:
> > > On Sat, 7 May 2011 12:05:21 -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
> > >> On Sat 07 May 2011 18:32 +0300, Ionu
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 01:48:04 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 21.04.2011 08:32, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:32 AM, David C. Rankin <
> >
> > drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 04/06/2011 10:34 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> >>> Upstream stability makes sense. If r
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 20:45:32 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747
>
>
> Greg
Is this some sort of configuration utility for Xorg? A little background would
be nice.
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 13:13:42 Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 19:40 +0300, Alper Kanat wrote:
> > s/failback/fallback/g
> >
> > sorry for the typo..
> >
> > ---
> > Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 19:39, Alper Kanat wrote:
> > > Hello Fellow
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:42:57 Arthur Titeica wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:50:41 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
> > [flaming]
> > I though KDE 4 was bad and bloated and that i couldn't get any
> > worse...
> > it seems i was wrong.
> > Boy this new Gnome version is even more bloated and buggy
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 15:07:27 Dennis Beekman wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 03:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:50 +0200, Dennis Beekman wrote:
> >> I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
> >> considered ... but lately Linux has been going in
It is against the Arch way when it's not even going to be actively maintained
upstream for much longer. GNOME 2's got maybe 6-8 months at most before
it's support is gone upstream, and Arch isn't there to act as a "historical
archive" of old desktop environments. Especially in the likely event G
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 14:50:41 Dennis Beekman wrote:
> I use linux becuase i think that windows is just to bloated to even be
> considered ... but lately Linux has been going in the same direction
> when it comes to the desktop enviroments Gnome 3 & KDE 4.
>
This is all a matter of opinion. I
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:54:23 Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:01:04 Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Yaro Kasear
wrote:
> > > > On Friday, April 08, 2
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:01:04 Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Friday, April 08, 2011 14:29:34 Heiko Baums wrote:
> > > Am Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:55:16 -0600
> > >
> > > schrieb Thomas S Hatch :
> > >
On Friday, April 08, 2011 14:29:34 Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:55:16 -0600
>
> schrieb Thomas S Hatch :
> > Yaro makes many good points, I think that my recommendation would
be
> > to allow someone to maintain support for SELinux in community. If
> >
On Friday, April 08, 2011 05:43:51 Kaiting Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > And on a side note, I don't like archlinux forcing users to use SELinux
> > because users should have a choice to use any MAC software they want.
> > That's why AppArmor /Tomoyo ar
>
> So in general what is the benefits / costs for SELinux?
>
Benefits: Probably the most effective MAC for Linux. Once it runs it's
arguably not too hard to allow/deny certain access due to some third party
tools simplifying things a bit. You can't deny the NSA-grade security it
brings whic
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 18:13:04 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis
wrote:
> >> Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> >> > I am saving the "include SELINUX support in base for a latter date"
> >> >
> >> > my understanding though is tha
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 15:27:27 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 05.04.2011 09:19, schrieb Thomas S Hatch:
> > I can think of three considerations for a cron daemon:
> > 1 . Minimal - its a cron daemon, it does not need to be complex
> > 2. Active development
> > 3. Anacron functionality
> >
> > A
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:20:17 pm Nathan Wayde wrote:
> On 23/01/11 18:13,
> hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_h
> are_h...@lavabit.com
>
> wrote:
> >> .you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list.
> >
> > Meeku: This attitude
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:17:54 pm o...@deathbycomputers.co.uk wrote:
> Been lurking here for a while and I'm now really considering dropping this
> list. Please do not feed the troll it will only make it worse.
>
> Cani
> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>
> -Original Message--
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:15:59 pm
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> > .trying to get people to use your font.spam.we're.
>
> Meeku: If you don't want to use the font fine.
I don't want you spamming yo
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:13:19 pm
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> > .you're a troll and a spammer. Get the hell off my mailing list.
>
> Meeku: This attitude does not do the reputation of your o/s any good. If
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:08:59 pm
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> > .stop spamming the mailing list.
>
> Meeku: I respond to silly accusations and now I get hounded also.
It's not a silly accusation when you're
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:05:15 pm
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> > Can somebody ban him?
>
> Meeku: Well then I question your opinion-judgement because font, coding
> and operating systems are related. If the spam
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:03:25 pm
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> > I'm racist against trolls. Am I a horrible person?
>
> Meeku: If the spam allegation is motivated by seeing spiritual email
> addresses on a publi
On Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:00:55 pm
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> > The fact he called it racism smells of a troll to me. Trolls are worse
> > than
> > spammers.
>
> Meeku: No. The person who did not wish me to par
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 01:28:50 pm Geoffrey Teale wrote:
> 2011/1/22 Yaro Kasear
>
> > On Saturday, January 22, 2011 09:09:22 am Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 06:23 -0500,
> >
> > hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_ram
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 09:28:35 am Steve Holmes wrote:
> What tools are needed in Arch to configure the login and logout sounds
> for GNOME?
>
> When I go into the Volume control, I can only change the alert sounds
> and that, I can do OK but right now, I cannot get any sounds to work
> for
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 09:09:22 am Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 06:23 -0500,
>
>
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> > > Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
> >
> > Meeku: "our" means the whol
On Saturday, January 22, 2011 05:23:13 am
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> > Can someone stop him from spamming our inboxes ?
>
> Meeku: "our" means the whole mailing list. You should have used the word
> "my" and if you
On Friday, January 21, 2011 06:10:02 pm Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > If it isn't broken, don't fix it. We put grub2 in [extra], not [core],
> > for the same reason we really should put systemd in [extra] and n
On Friday, January 21, 2011 05:42:17 pm Ray Rashif wrote:
(snip)
> > indeed, and i'd mostly agree. however while im not a developer for
> > archlinux, i wouldnt waste time on obsolete systems when a better
> > alternative saves me time; you may end up maintaining the initscripts
> > yourself. kee
On Friday, January 21, 2011 11:53:22 am C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> oh... my. there is too much to respond properly
> so i'll try touch a couple [several] things ...
>
> ... why the resistance at all? let me reiterate this nce and slow:
>
Because it's completely unnecessary.
> SYSVINIT HA
On Friday, January 21, 2011 07:43:55 am Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
(snip)
> And as other people said – I'm afraid of systemd even more because it
> was written by the same person as Pulse Audio was. PA didn't work very
> well for quite a long time. I'm not going to argue about that (it's
> just my per
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 07:09:43 pm Sander Jansen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 20, 2011 06:48:14 pm Sander Jansen wrote:
> > (snip)
> >
> >> - It's nice you can install it next to sysv-init. Thi
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 07:05:23 pm Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 18:55 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 20, 2011 06:48:14 pm Sander Jansen wrote:
> > (snip)
> >
> > > - It's nice you can install it next to sysv-init. This
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 07:03:23 pm Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
(snip)
> This talk is probably a year or so out of date however. Try pulseaudio
> now, I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. You'd also have noticed
> that actual bug reports on our forums/ML etc. concerning pulseaudio have
> dropped to c
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 06:48:14 pm Sander Jansen wrote:
(snip)
>
> - It's nice you can install it next to sysv-init. This makes it really
> easy to test without breaking the system.
You can do this? I might try it out. If it works as expected in its stage of
development, I'll quick being
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 06:38:08 pm Sander Jansen wrote:
> 2011/1/20 Yaro Kasear :
> > On Thursday, January 20, 2011 06:27:04 pm Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:52 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> >> > I was ALMOST behind a switch to systemd until I f
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 06:27:04 pm Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:52 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > I was ALMOST behind a switch to systemd until I found out the guy behind
> > it is Lennart Poettering. Now we can expect a half-broken init system
> > that&#x
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
