On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Squall Lionheart
wrote:
> I don't see an option related to GLODA in edit->prefs->advanced->general,
> is it the same as "Enable Global Search and Indexer"?
>
> Thanks
> Squall
>
Yes under exactly that option select to "not" Enable Global Search and
Indexer - then
I don't see an option related to GLODA in edit->prefs->advanced->general,
is it the same as "Enable Global Search and Indexer"?
Thanks
Squall
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:57 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Genes MailLists
> wrote:
> > On 08/10/2012 12:41 AM, gt wrote:
>
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/10/2012 12:41 AM, gt wrote:
>
>>
>> Why don't you guys try something like claws or sylpheed, if you are
>> having problem with thunderbird. I have used claws a couple of times
>> and I can say that it consumes minimal resources (for a
On 08/10/2012 08:35 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 08/10/2012 12:41 AM, gt wrote:
Why don't you guys try something like claws or sylpheed, if you are
having problem with thunderbird. I have used claws a couple of times
and I can say that it consumes minimal resources (for a graphical
client).
On 08/10/2012 12:41 AM, gt wrote:
Why don't you guys try something like claws or sylpheed, if you are
having problem with thunderbird. I have used claws a couple of times
and I can say that it consumes minimal resources (for a graphical
client).
Unless lots has changed recently, Claws is n
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 04:14:20PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 03:56 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> >
> >Must keep up with the I need a new version because the old one is working too
> >well.
> >Must find something to break
> >
> >Aye, the microsoft culture has finally invaded linux.
> >
On 08/09/2012 03:56 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
Must keep up with the I need a new version because the old one is working too
well.
Must find something to break
Aye, the microsoft culture has finally invaded linux.
No kidding!
In more ways than one... It's nice to know the new thunderbird only
On 08/09/2012 03:54 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 08/08/2012 03:20 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
Thunderbird really is a big pile of crap. There are bugs everywhere! I
havn't seen something this bad since KDE 4.0. The only reason I didn't
switch to mutt yet is that I don't know how to replace the filte
My opinion is that they are trying to keep up with the version number of
chromium. So many in the past have plaid with version numbers to make them
selfs "look" better and more mature. M$ has done it, Slackware did it,
Mozilla is doing it...
$ pacman -Ss chromium
extra/chromium 21.0.1180.75-1
S
On 08/08/2012 03:20 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
Thunderbird really is a big pile of crap. There are bugs everywhere! I
havn't seen something this bad since KDE 4.0. The only reason I didn't
switch to mutt yet is that I don't know how to replace the filter feature.
You know when projects start playin
On 08/08/2012 11:46 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
What version of thunderbird where you using?
I have 13.0
I have 14.0. You are very lucky, I see anywhere from 30-99.9% when
accessing folders, scrolling, etc.. After it completes all operations, then it
will settle down to 0.3%. I have tried differe
On 08/08/2012 08:33 AM, Adam Sparks wrote:
I saw an email just like this like week and made a switch to chromium.
There is a difference. Especially when opening a new window, Firefox has
some very large spikes. Don't use Thunderbird so I cannot say anything
about that.
Thanks,
If you are run
>
> I've got similar issues with Thunderbird, when I've got installed
> enigmail. Maybe that's the issue?
I would suggest disabling all your add ons and see if anything changes with
your cpu usage. I run these apps on a regular bases with minimal
extensions and have never had cpu usage issues, u
I've got similar issues with Thunderbird, when I've got installed
enigmail. Maybe that's the issue?
On 08/09/2012 05:04 PM, Squall Lionheart wrote:
I run firefox 14.0.1 and thunderbird 14.0 from extra and don't have any
issues with performance. Have you checked your plugins to see if any of
th
On 08/08/2012 03:20 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 02:34 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> I have watched this in top for the past week or so. Thunderbird and
>> Firefox are causing X cpu usage to shoot upt to between 80-100% on
>> simple tasks like scrolling a message list
On 08/08/2012 09:33 AM, Adam Sparks wrote:
I saw an email just like this like week and made a switch to chromium.
There is a difference. Especially when opening a new window, Firefox has
some very large spikes. Don't use Thunderbird so I cannot say anything
about that.
On Aug 8, 2012 6:30 AM, "Th
I saw an email just like this like week and made a switch to chromium.
There is a difference. Especially when opening a new window, Firefox has
some very large spikes. Don't use Thunderbird so I cannot say anything
about that.
On Aug 8, 2012 6:30 AM, "Thaddeus Nielsen" wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 201
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:34:14 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Guys,
>
>I have watched this in top for the past week or so. Thunderbird
> and Firefox are causing X cpu usage to shoot upt to between 80-100%
> on simple tasks like scrolling a message list in tbird or simply
> opening css menus
On 08/08/2012 02:34 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have watched this in top for the past week or so. Thunderbird and
> Firefox are causing X cpu usage to shoot upt to between 80-100% on
> simple tasks like scrolling a message list in tbird or simply opening
> css menus in firefox. All o
On 08/08/2012 08:34 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I have watched this in top for the past week or so. Thunderbird and
Firefox are causing X cpu usage to shoot upt to between 80-100% on
simple tasks like scrolling a message list in tbird or simply opening
css menus in firefox. All of this
Guys,
I have watched this in top for the past week or so. Thunderbird and Firefox
are causing X cpu usage to shoot upt to between 80-100% on simple tasks like
scrolling a message list in tbird or simply opening css menus in firefox. All
of this used to be instantaneous and never cause the cp
21 matches
Mail list logo
