Anyone know what happened to the "telinit" shortcut? It used to be
included in systemd-sysvcompat
(https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd#systemd-sysvcompat) but
seems like it recently got removed. Was it removed upstream? (And if
so, anyone know why?)
Thanks,
DR
> Is it possible to update it in [testing] at least?
This version is not an “upgradeable” release, as stated by the
upstream. Not considered “next version” in the upgrades sequence. The
next version after 68.11 is 78.2, which is not released yet.
Hypothetically [testing] could provide that
>
> From: Franck STAUFFER
> Sent: Sat Aug 15 09:32:51 CEST 2020
> To: karx via arch-general
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78
>
>
> Shouldn't it be the opposite?
> This is not Debian Stable, packages should be up-to-date and if people
> want
On 8/15/20 3:07 AM, ProgAndy wrote:
> It was mentioned on arch-dev-public:
>
> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2020-March/029895.html
>
> There were no maintainers that were able to test the legacy nvidia packages
> anymore, so they had to be dropped.
>
> Unofficial
Is it possible to update it in [testing] at least?
Le 15/08/2020 à 09:52, Archange via arch-general a écrit :
Le 15 août 2020 11:32:51 GMT+04:00, Franck STAUFFER
a écrit :
Shouldn't it be the opposite?
This is not Debian Stable, packages should be up-to-date and if people
want older package
Am 15.08.20 um 09:57 schrieb David C. Rankin:
> ...
> That is a shame. You just can't pull a videocard out of your i7 laptop to
> update for fun, and you sure can't run desktop effects in KDE without it. I'm
> not sure I understand the logic in Arch dropping the 390xx drivers relegating
> a host
On 8/14/20 3:18 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Additionally, I've done a completely additional reinstall:
>
> # pacman -Qqn | pacman -S -
>
> All goes well, no errors, but the boot still hangs on tty1 and no GUI or X is
> every started though sddm says it is running.
>
> I think it is time to
Le 15 août 2020 11:32:51 GMT+04:00, Franck STAUFFER
a écrit :
>Shouldn't it be the opposite?
>This is not Debian Stable, packages should be up-to-date and if people
>want older package they have to package it themselves in AUR.
>Am I wrong?
Not when a feature expected by many Arch users is
Shouldn't it be the opposite?
This is not Debian Stable, packages should be up-to-date and if people
want older package they have to package it themselves in AUR.
Am I wrong?
On 8/15/20 5:27 AM, karx via arch-general wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020, 9:45 PM mpan wrote:
Is there any reason the
Am 15.08.20 um 05:39 schrieb Kusoneko:
> On August 15, 2020 3:27:50 AM UTC, karx via arch-general
> wrote:
>> couldn't we package thunderbird 78 in
>> the AUR for people who absolutely need 78,
>
> Sure, go ahead and do that if you want.
>
There is thunderbird-bin in the AUR which repackages
10 matches
Mail list logo
