Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-04-14 Thread Alexei Peters
properly in practice. >> >> We once did an experiment where we had 10 people who were used to >> entering data in our archaeological inventory system enter the same site. >> We paired the archaeologists: one more more experienced data entry person >> (a few years experience) and o

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-04-01 Thread Adam Lodge
_CERTAINTY_3,unknown,,COMPONENT CERTAINTY TYPE > > > > > > > > AUTHORITY DOCUMENT.csv,Index,i3mainz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - COMPONENT CERTAINTY TYPE AUTHORITY DOCUMENT.values.csv (do we > > > > > > > >

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-04-01 Thread Tobias Kohr
gt; Tobias >>>> >>>> On Monday, March 31, 2014 11:22:27 PM UTC+2, Koen Van Daele wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I just wanted to get back at what Dennis said at the beginning of this >>>> thread. Im quite curiou

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-04-01 Thread Tobias Kohr
a in our archaeological inventory system enter the same site. >>> We paired the archaeologists: one more more experienced data entry person >>> (a few years experience) and one newbie (a few months), so they would be >>> forced to really think things through and discuss. In

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-04-01 Thread Adam Lodge
ta entry person is about the location of the >> site, ie. about the polygon they might have drawn on a map. This field only >> allowed 5 choices, ranging from 1 (I'm sure it's exactly where it needs to >> be) to 5 (I have no idea whatsoever where the site is). We had a very >

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-04-01 Thread Tobias Kohr
n the exact same information > they had all drawn totally different conclusions. And this was about > something as simple as the location of the site. > > So, I'm very curious about how you manage to prevent stuff like this from > happening. > > The other thing I wonder a

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-04-01 Thread Adam Lodge
of the site, ie. about the polygon they might have drawn on a > > > > map. This field only allowed 5 choices, ranging from 1 (I'm sure it's > > > > exactly where it needs to be) to 5 (I have no idea whatsoever where the > > > > site is). We had a v

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-04-01 Thread Tobias Kohr
very curious about how you manage to prevent stuff like this from > happening. > > The other thing I wonder about: how does certainty affect searching? > Should a search for 'churches' only return sites that have a certain > "certainty" attached to the interpretation

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-04-01 Thread Adam Lodge
r thing I wonder about: how does certainty affect searching? Should > > a search for 'churches' only return sites that have a certain "certainty" > > attached to the interpretation? Are you working with sliding scale of > > certainty (ie. we are 75% perc

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-04-01 Thread Tobias Kohr
churches' only return sites that have a certain > "certainty" attached to the interpretation? Are you working with sliding > scale of certainty (ie. we are 75% percent certain about this statement) or > a binary one (we're certain or uncertain)? > > Cheers, > Koen >

RE: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-03-31 Thread Van Daele, Koen
_ Van: archesproject@googlegroups.com [archesproject@googlegroups.com] namens dwuthr...@fargeo.com [dwuthr...@fargeo.com] Verzonden: donderdag 27 maart 2014 22:36 Aan: thomas.enge...@gmail.com CC: archesproject@googlegroups.com Onderwerp: Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-03-31 Thread dwuthr...@fargeo.com
; http://www.heritagedata.org/blog/ > > > > > From: arches...@googlegroups.com [mailto:arches...@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf Of Tobias Kohr > Sent: 31 March 2014 14:52 > To: arches...@googlegroups.com > Cc: 'Tobias Kohr'; thomas@gmail.com > Subje

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-03-31 Thread Tobias Kohr
--- > *From:* arches...@googlegroups.com [mailto: > arches...@googlegroups.com ] *On Behalf Of *Tobias Kohr > *Sent:* 31 March 2014 14:52 > *To:* arches...@googlegroups.com > *Cc:* 'Tobias Kohr'; thomas@gmail.com > *Subject:* Re: [Arches] "uncertain infor

RE: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-03-31 Thread Carlisle, Philip
/blog/ From: archesproject@googlegroups.com [mailto:archesproject@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tobias Kohr Sent: 31 March 2014 14:52 To: archesproject@googlegroups.com Cc: 'Tobias Kohr'; thomas.enge...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Arches] "uncertain inform

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-03-31 Thread Tobias Kohr
age.org.uk/ > > > > http://www.heritagedata.org/blog/ > > > > > > -------------- > *From:* arches...@googlegroups.com [mailto: > arches...@googlegroups.com ] *On Behalf Of *Tobias Kohr > *Sent:* 28 March 2014 14:33 > *To:* arches...@

RE: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-03-31 Thread Carlisle, Philip
Tobias Kohr Sent: 28 March 2014 14:33 To: archesproject@googlegroups.com Cc: thomas.enge...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches Hi Dennis, thanks for your quick response! Working together with Thomas, in fact one option that came to our mind was to attach &q

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-03-28 Thread Tobias Kohr
Hi Dennis, thanks for your quick response! Working together with Thomas, in fact one option that came to our mind was to attach "certainty nodes" to the entities where we need them (Component.E18 and Phase Type Assignment.E17 in our case) to technically implement uncertainty in Arches. We are

Re: [Arches] "uncertain information" in Arches

2014-03-27 Thread dwuthr...@fargeo.com
Thomas, Good question! You are quite correct that we haven't tried to include uncertainty in Arches. One reason is pretty basic: certainty is quite subjective from person to person. For example: most people agree that the earth is spherical. But a "flat-earther" may be very certain that the