] https://github.com/wso2/carbon-apimgt/pull/9366
[2] https://github.com/wso2/product-apim-tooling/pull/525
Thanks,
Wasura
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 12:00 PM Wasura Wattearachchi
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to add the below points to the Limitations in the Current
> Behaviour under t
, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:02 PM Wasura Wattearachchi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is regarding the feature mentioned in [1] which requests to support
> importing and exporting throttling policies using the API Controller.
> Before discussing this new feature, let’s look at the current/exist
or swagger.yaml with the
corresponding throttling policy(ies), the users can change the policies
according to the environment.
Thanks,
Wasura
> Thanks,
> Harsha
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:08 PM Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As p
2020 at 17:36, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>>
>>> Is the purpose of this feature to move throttling policies across
>>> environments or across product versions?
>>>
>>> Across environments
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:02 PM Wasura Wattearachchi
>>>
b.com/wso2/product-apim-tooling/issues/329
Thank you!
--
*Wasura Wattearachchi* | Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
(m) +94775396038 | (e) was...@wso2.com | (b) Medium
<https://medium.com/@wasuradananjith>
[image: http://wso2.com/signature] <http:/
Hi all,
*Bug Fixes And Improvements in API Manager Tooling 2.0.9*
>
The above heading in the above mail should be changed to *Bug Fixes And
Improvements in API Manager Tooling 2.0.10*.
Sorry for the inconvenience caused.
Thanks!
--
*Wasura Wattearachchi* | Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
curity Vulnerability
Reporting Guidelines
<https://docs.wso2.com/display/Security/WSO2+Security+Vulnerability+Reporting+Guidelines>
when
reporting the security issues.
*-- The WSO2 API Manager Team --*
--
*Wasura Wattearachchi* | Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
(m) +94775396038 | (e) was
Vulnerability
Reporting Guidelines
<https://docs.wso2.com/display/Security/WSO2+Security+Vulnerability+Reporting+Guidelines>
when
reporting the security issues.
*-- The WSO2 API Manager Team --*
--
*Wasura Wattearachchi* | Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
(m) +94775396038 | (e) was...@wso2.com
o2.com/en/3.2.0/install-and-setup/upgrading-wso2-api-manager/upgrading-process/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please download, test the product and vote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [+] Stable - go ahead and release
>>>>>>&
gt;>> Kubernetes API operator to deploy and manage APIs in the Kubernetes
>>>>> cluster
>>>>> by reducing additional overheads for the DevOps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find the new features, improvements and fixes related to this
>>&
minda
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 4:25 PM Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I tested the following scenarios in APIM 3.2.0 RC5.
>>
>>- Reverse Proxy
>>- Product Profiles
>> - Traffic Manager
>> - Key Manager
mail : musht...@wso2.com
> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com/
> lean . enterprise . middleware.
>
> <http://wso2.com/signature>
>
--
*Wasura Wattearachchi* | Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
(m) +94775396038 | (e) was...@wso2.com | (b) Medium
<https://medium.com/@wasuradananjith>
[image: htt
th having their
> own DefaultApplication.
>
> So if you try to delete the DefaultApplication from apictl, you need to
> specify the owner correctly so that APIM will know which instance of the
> DefaultApplication that it needs to delete.
>
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 16:40
g that to first change the owner and then
> deleting is also an option. Please check for any drawbacks.
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 4:40 PM Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently, the API Controller provides “apictl delete app” command which
ny.
[1]
https://apim.docs.wso2.com/en/next/learn/api-controller/getting-started-with-wso2-api-controller/#delete-an-apiapi-productapplication-in-an-environment
[2] https://github.com/wso2/product-apim-tooling/issues/335
Thank you!
--
*Wasura Wattearachchi* | Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
(m) +947
, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:49 AM Wasura Wattearachchi
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First of all, I must say that, in the first table of the first mail, I
> have mistakenly added app_product_import_export (which is a wrong scope)
> instead of app_import_export. Please find the correc
in the granularity level, I thought of adding
apim:app_import_export here in this operation.
Let me know your suggestions or whether I have misinterpreted your
question @Malintha
Amarasinghe .
Thank you!
--
*Wasura Wattearachchi* | Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
(m) +94775396038 | (e) was...@wso
d approach can be identified
in addition to the above-stated approach.
[1]
https://apim.docs.wso2.com/en/next/learn/api-controller/advanced-topics/creating-custom-users-to-perform-api-controller-operations
[2] https://github.com/wso2/product-apim-tooling/issues/328
Thank you!
--
*Wasur
Product either
with the dependent APIs or not, using the flag --import-apis. Does this
accomplish our goal? WDYT?
Thanks,
Wasura
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 7:49 PM Uvindra Dias Jayasinha
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 19:04, Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
&g
a semantic difference between the 2
> solutions. Can we get some feedback from others as well regarding this?
>
>
>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:09 AM Uvindra Dias Jayasinha
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 20:05, Wasura Wattearachchi
&
oducts. So it may not be a good
> idea to have the same api-impot-export for both product and API import?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:48 AM Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We currently do not have any specific scopes fo
t; Thanks,
> Bhathiya
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:24 PM Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> During the code review that conducted today (15th May 2020), a question
>> arose related to the scope that has been used in the REST API level.
>>
this is fair when considering CI/CD flow and
whether there is a practical situation that this problem may arise like
mentioned here. WDYT?
Thank you!
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:04 PM Wasura Wattearachchi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> If --update-apis == true {
>>// Upd
nd its dependent APIs in
another tenant (with --preserve-provider=false)
Set (it will be true)
Not set (by default false)
-
Update an already imported API Product and its dependent APIs in another
tenant (with --preserve-provider=false)
Not set (by default false)
Set (it will be true)
Than
;>> The commands are now a binding API. If we are changing them in the
>>>>>> future we need to first deprecate the current ones.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes that's what I meant to decide best way to migrate our existing
>>>>> commands lat
e best approach (deciding a command
format and deprecating commands).
Your feedback and opinions are warmly welcomed.
[1] Mail: [APIM] Support for API Products from API Controller
[2] https://github.com/wso2/product-apim-tooling/issues/293
Thank you!
--
*Wasura Wattearachchi* | Software Engineer
t once, in a future release?
Your opinions will be highly appreciated.
Thank you!
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:13 AM Wasura Wattearachchi
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is regarding the issue
> <https://github.com/wso2/product-apim-tooling/issues/168> which requests
> to support li
b.com/wso2/product-apim-tooling/issues/291
Thank you!
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:13 AM Wasura Wattearachchi
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is regarding the issue
> <https://github.com/wso2/product-apim-tooling/issues/168> which requests
> to support listing and generating toke
rently, we do not support deleting APIs or Apps from API Controller, but
soon it will get implemented as well. After that was implemented, we can
use a similar kind of approach to implement deleting API Products too.
Thank you!
--
*Wasura Wattearachchi* | Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
(m) +947753960
ould specify the
version as 1.0.0. (Should document this assumption)
Thank you!
--
*Wasura Wattearachchi* | Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
(m) +94775396038 | (e) was...@wso2.com | (b) Medium
<https://medium.com/@wasuradananjith>
[image: http://w
; the API Subscriber cannot tell the difference between the two.
>
> Keeping this in mind, see my comments inline.
>
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 10:13, Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is regarding the issue
>> <https://github.com/ws
.
Your feedback to choose the appropriate approaches and commands (with the
problems that may arise) for each of the above tasks will be much
appreciated. Furthermore, it would be great if new more simplified
approaches can be identified in addition to the above-stated approaches.
Thank you!
--
*Wasu
[-] Broken - Do not release *(explain why)
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> WSO2 API Manager Team
>
> --
> *Naduni Pamudika* | Senior Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
> (m) +94 (71) 9143658 | (w) +94 (11) 2145345 | (e) nad...@wso2.com
> [image: http://wso2.com/signature] <ht
.
>>> (m) +94 (71) 9143658 | (w) +94 (11) 2145345 | (e) nad...@wso2.com
>>> [image: http://wso2.com/signature] <http://wso2.com/signature>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> *Rajith Roshan* | Associate Technical Lead | WSO2 Inc.
>> (m) +94-717-064-
't need to)?
>
Probably the Jaggery UI wil be replaced. So our main aim is to implement
the functionality by doing the back-end changes where necessary. But I will
try to implement the UI part as well.
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 4:48 PM Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
will be hugely appreciated.
[1] https://github.com/wso2/product-apim/issues/3184
Thank you!
--
Wasura Wattearachchi | Software Engineer Intern | WSO2 Inc.
(m) +94775396038 | (e) was...@wso2.com
<http://wso2.com/signature>
___
Architecture mailin
data in *APIDAOImpl.java *
file.
- Modified DAO integration tests and tested for h2, MySQL, MSSQL, Oracle
and PostgreSQL databases.
- Wrote integration tests in product-apim and tested them.
Thanks!
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:07 AM Wasura Wattearachchi
wrote:
> Hi Pub
to
delete comments, not to edit the comments.
Thanks!
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:37 PM Pubudu Gunatilaka wrote:
> Hi Wasura,
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:20 PM Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok sure.
>> I have a doubt to be clarified. When editing a commen
rposes. We don't associate them with any business logic nor do we
> reason out any logic for having or not having those columns.
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:02 AM Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ishara,
>>
>> Thank you for pointing this out.
>>
&g
gt;
Thank you!
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:54 PM Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> According to what we have discussed today during the code review, I added
>> a new attribute named ENTRY_POINT to distinguish the role of the person,
>> bas
egards,
> Ishara Cooray
> Senior Software Engineer
> Mobile : +9477 262 9512
> WSO2, Inc. | http://wso2.com/
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Wasura Wattearachchi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ishara,
>>
>> I agree with yo
ture
> Request" or "General". By default it should be "General.
>
> What is the way that we identify the category of a particular comment?
>
--
Wasura Wattearachchi
Software Engineer Intern | WSO2
Email: was...@wso2.com
Mobile: +94775396038
search. By
default it should be "ALL" when search starts. When typing keywords all the
categories will be searched. Then you can change the tags while searching
by keywords as you like.
Thanks!
Thanks,
> NuwanD.
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:27 AM Wasura Wattearachchi
> wr
43 matches
Mail list logo
