Have you seen *Enqueue* and *RMSequence* mediators being used when
implementing mediation logics?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Kasun Indrasiri wrote:
> Shall we deprecate following mediators in 4.10 release.
>
> *- Callout mediator :*
> All the callout functionality is supported with 'call'
Hi Isuru,
I've used it in a mediation sequence where I use a POJO to generate a
unique customer id given a couple of parameters and there's a checksum
added to the end. I already had written this code and it was quite simple
and straightforward to reuse it with a POJOCommand mediator. I feel the
s
Hi,
I think we will have to test call mediator in blocking mode for some
different use cases. Then we will have to update Documentation about
blocking capability of call mediator. For example the Call Mediator
Documentation for ESB 4.9.0 [1] does not contain any information about
blocking behavior
Hi Kathees,
I think we should do a comparison once more to make sure that we have
covered everything before removing Callout. NTLM one which Harshana pointed
out may be due to absence of initClientOptions configuration option.
Hi Vidura,
Point you raised on the POJOCommand mediator is really inte
+1 to deprecate Callout mediator since we have the Callout mediator
functionalities in Call mediator.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Vidura Gamini Abhaya
wrote:
> I've found DBReport / DBLookup to be quite useful for simple DB operations
> as they are easy to do OOTB. While DB Lookup mediator
I've found DBReport / DBLookup to be quite useful for simple DB operations
as they are easy to do OOTB. While DB Lookup mediator maybe limited in it's
ability to only being able to return a single row of data, DB Report
mediator is still quite useful in writing to a database, especially when we
use
Is it going to be complete functional Deprecate? If yes, there will be not
forward compatibility during the upgrades.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Isuru Udana wrote:
> Hi Harshana,
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Harshana Eranga Martin <
> harshan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kasun,
>>
>
Hi Harshana,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Harshana Eranga Martin wrote:
> Hi Kasun,
>
> Please see the comments inline.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Harshana
> --
> Harshana Eranga Martin
>
> Committer - Eclipse ECF: http://www.eclipse.org/ecf/
> Blog: http://harshana05.blogspot.com
> Profile: h
Hi Kasun,
Please see the comments inline.
Thanks and Regards,
Harshana
--
Harshana Eranga Martin
Committer - Eclipse ECF: http://www.eclipse.org/ecf/
Blog: http://harshana05.blogspot.com
Profile: https://www.google.com/profiles/harshana05
On 9 December 2015 at 17:41, Kasun Indrasiri wrote:
>
*- Callout mediator :*
All the callout functionality is supported with 'call' mediator with
blocking=true. Having two similar mediators will be create a bit of a
confusion.
It will make a lot of confusion when we have more than one mediators to do
the same thing. Therefore, better to deprecate th
Shall we deprecate following mediators in 4.10 release.
*- Callout mediator :*
All the callout functionality is supported with 'call' mediator with
blocking=true. Having two similar mediators will be create a bit of a
confusion.
*- DBReport/DBLookup mediator*
These mediators offer very limited f
11 matches
Mail list logo