Agree entirely and well said, Fernando.
Michael
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 10:37 Fernando Frediani wrote:
> If there are not enough incentives already let's create more then. We, as
> a community in a bottom up process as responsible for creating them based
> on what is right and fair to most peopl
I believe the conversation is valid and should continue… if there is
another active list that is a better fit then move it there but as Tom
pointed out this seems to be the most appropriate list.
My vote is to keep the conversation going.
Michael
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 01:59 Tom Fantacone wrote
I don’t see a reason to shut it down as it keeps at least some level of
standard and provides revenue for ARIN.
But then again in completely against brokeraging IP addresses. So I could
go either way.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 17:26 Dominik Dobrowolski <
dominikdobrowolski...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If
t;
> Owen
>
>
> On Jun 1, 2023, at 16:51, Michael B. Williams via ARIN-PPML <
> arin-ppml@arin.net> wrote:
>
> Fees for IP Brokers should be 100,000 times more, in my opinion.
>
> The fact that there is even a business for IP trading is sickening.
>
> On Fri, Jun 2,
Fees for IP Brokers should be 100,000 times more, in my opinion.
The fact that there is even a business for IP trading is sickening.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 6:32 AM Tom Fantacone wrote:
> I was a bit stunned this morning to see our organization's ARIN fees
> would be going up by a factor of 10.
I don’t believe third party leasing at a /24 or higher is in anyone’s best
interest expect IP brokers and those obtaining IP resources with the intent
to resell.
I’m not against portability but if a participant wants portability they’d
need a /24 or higher. Aquire their own IP resources…
On Mon,
Noah very well said, and I completely agree!
Capitalism decided otherwise... The business model changed the day IP
brokers realised they could earn a living by sitting in their couches,
running no useful IP-based network and thereby undermining the
community-based RIR system role and long-standing
+1
Completely agree with this.
Michael
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 07:33 Fernando Frediani wrote:
> You can only lease what you own. What people are trying to do here is
> pretend they own the resources and earn money with an asset they don't own
> despite everything that what IP addresses have alw
The problem is that some genuine market participants may be unable to
afford the market rate, thus stifling potential market entry or innovation.
I am not necessarily against this idea as long as there are appropriate
ways to preserve market entry for new entrants without. I am not
necessarily say
money from obtaining IP space. True, we usually assume they'll be doing it
> the old-fashioned way, by (gasp) offering services - however I think that
> somehow "tainting" the waitlist-obtained addresses is going to cause more
> trouble than it would prevent.
>
>
&g
I completely agree!
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 1:21 PM John Santos wrote:
> Totally against. This violates the principle of "justified need". It is
> rent-seeking.
>
> On 5/5/2023 11:54 AM, WOOD Alison * DAS wrote:
> > Good morning PPML!
> >
> > I would like community feedback on the leasing of i
for profit.
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 11:58 AM Michael B. Williams <
michael.willi...@glexia.com> wrote:
> Are you asking if an entity were to obtain IP space from the waitlist,
> should they be permitted to lease it to someone else? My answer is a
> resounding no. That defeats the whol
Are you asking if an entity were to obtain IP space from the waitlist,
should they be permitted to lease it to someone else? My answer is a
resounding no. That defeats the whole purpose of the waitlist. Entities
should not be encouraged to hoard IP space because ARIN will subsidise the
cost, allowi
Agreed. Extremely rare.
Is there an award we could nominate John for or send him an Amazon gift
card or something?
Michael
--
*Michael B. Williams *
Glexia - An IT Company
Book a Meeting With Me <https://calendly.com/glexia-michael-williams>
USA Direct: +1 9
Excellent work! Thank you, John!
John Curran wrote:
> FYI - As a reminder, please do not hijack the use of address blocks issued
> to other parties.
>
> Thanks,
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *Spammers Plead
11, 2022, at 10:31 PM, Michael B. Williams via ARIN-PPML <
> arin-ppml@arin.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> I received the same email. I asked them for a sample and they're just
> dumping WHOIS data.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
> --
I received the same email. I asked them for a sample and they're just
dumping WHOIS data.
Regards,
Michael
--
*Michael B. Williams *
Glexia - An IT Company
Book a Meeting With Me <https://calendly.com/glexia-michael-williams>
michael.willi...
Agreed. This is utterly embarrassing. How did they think this is an
appropriate response given the conversation going on this list? Perhaps
lawyers? What needs to be done to fix this so if those being rejected
request transparency that transparency is provided?
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 3:18 PM Willi
John -
Are lowly ARIN members like me permitted to make proposals though? I am
only a X-Small organisation. Or do I need to funnel these to a larger
organisation for submission?
Regards,
Michael
--
*Michael B. Williams *
Glexia - An IT Company
Book a Meeting With
Indeed. Now how do we get transparency going forward?
--
*Michael B. Williams *
Glexia - An IT Company
Book a Meeting With Me <https://calendly.com/glexia-michael-williams>
michael.willi...@glexia.com
michael.willi...@secure.glexia.com (High-Security Correspo
necessity be applied to future
> elections, not to the current situation. The recourse for the current
> situation (for ARIN members) is simply to support the petitions and then
> vote in the election.
>
> -Scott
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 7:18 PM Michael B. Williams <
>
Thank you, Scott. Well said. Transparency is needed and I will support any
policy to make that happen.
Michael
--
*Michael B. Williams *
Glexia - An IT Company
The information in this electronic mail message is the sender's
confidential business and may be le
Is NomCom able to explain how this happened? In my opinion, unless they
cannot offer some credible explanation everyone on NomCom should be removed
from any position of official power at ARIN. Embarrassing to say the least.
--
*Michael B. Williams *
Glexia - An IT
+3 Bill’s edits below.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 23:02 Mattapally Technologies <
technologiesmattapa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +2 Bill’s suggested edits below
>
> On Thursday, July 29, 2021, Brian Jones wrote:
>
>> +1 Bill’s suggested edits below.
>>
>>
>> > On Jul 28, 2021, at 3:43 PM, William Herri
Agreed that this should be updated to illustrate that BGP is an example.
Whilst it may be the most likely candidate currently, new and emerging
technologies may come along :)
Michael
--
*Michael B. Williams *
Glexia - An IT Company
Book a Meeting With Me <ht
s,
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
>
>
> On 17 Jan 2021, at 7:48 AM, Michael B. Williams <
> michael.willi...@glexia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> Just to be clear though my understanding is that despi
they did not feel like using the PDP simply because they did not want to.
Regards,
Michael
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 23:33 John Curran wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2021, at 4:16 AM, Michael B. Williams <
> michael.willi...@glexia.com> wrote:
> >
> > Fernando -
> >
> >
Fernando -
I don’t believe this is correct. The board, from my reading, is able to
make and adopt without any other input or approval from anyone else any
policy they deem appropriate fair and fit for internet number and resource
allocation.
John Curran - please correct me if I’m wrong here but t
I'd be very interested to know this as well...
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815-301-5570
michael.
strongly
> encourages everyone in the community to engage here. Our decision process
> is always enhanced by plentiful community input.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul
>
> —
> Paul Andersen, P. Eng
> Chair, ARIN Board of Trustees
> p...@arin.net
>
> On Jan 14, 20
?
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815-301-5570
michael.willi...@glexia.com
https://www.glexia.com/
https://www.glexia.com.au/
*Legal
I do not support this petition.
GLEXIA-3 (Glexia, Inc)
Michael Williams
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815
I do not support this policy or petition.
It's very simple; a small group of people stand to gain from 2020-2 at the
expense of the broader community. It is in no way fair.
Those pushing for this policy need to accept that they're not entitled to
anymore than the rest of us.
Regards,
Michael
O
All -
After reading the various viewpoints on this list, I have changed my
opinion on this proposition and now oppose its passing.
I oppose adoption of ARIN-2020-2 "Reinstatement of Organizations Removed
from Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16".
Regards,
Michael
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at
What are the steps to officially tally feedback up received from the
community to document all the emails coming in on this?
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594
I personally am fine with a limit of /20 maximum for reintroduction.
Michael
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax
I support this policy in its entirety on behalf of GLEXI-3. We were
adversely impacted by this removal.
Michael
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll
Completely disagree with any attempt to force ipv6 adoption by conditioning
IPv4 on it.
These should remain seperate.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 06:34 Steven Ryerse via ARIN-PPML <
arin-ppml@arin.net> wrote:
> I completely disagree with any attempt to force IPv6 adoption via IPv4
> policy. The rig
Spot on. Excellent analysis and great job breaking down the facts.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 06:46 Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 4, 2020, at 12:41 , hostmas...@uneedus.com wrote:
> >
> > I understand that there might have been some poor choices made with IPv6
> in regard to address allocation t
Agreed. Support this for the time being.
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815-301-5570
michael.willi
Support. Because I don’t ever see us allocating directly; instead
everything will be placed on the wait list. It’s a bit annoying joining
thinking you qualify for a /21 then have to submit significant
justification to get a second /22 (bringing you to a /21).
Michael
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 11:18
Yes, that is my understanding.
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815-301-5570
michael.willi...@glexia.com
https
Agreed, Brian.
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815-301-5570
michael.willi...@glexia.com
https
36, 42 or 48 months for transfers ? Seems more reasonable in my view and
cover most aspects of this discussion.
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Free
think this shows that even at the /21 level we do not have ripe transfer
abuse for IPs to another organization.
--
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Free Call
vocation of all resources issued pursuant to fraud and $350,000
to ARIN for its legal fees.
----------
*Michael B. Williams*
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Free Call: +61 1800 9
46 matches
Mail list logo
