On Sep 4, 2014, at 3:35 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
> Please forgive my ignorance of the details of the policy development process,
> but based on what I can see from looking at the timelines for other proposals
> on the ARIN website, it doesn't appear to me that this policy has any time
> left to b
Please forgive my ignorance of the details of the policy development process,
but based on what I can see from looking at the timelines for other proposals
on the ARIN website, it doesn't appear to me that this policy has any time left
to be relevant. It appears that the proposal would need to b
>
> Problem Statement:
>
> New and small organizations are having a difficult time receiving resource
> allocations from ARIN because of the economic, administrative and time
> burdens of making their way through ARIN's needs testing process. For small
I haven't seen any evidence of this.
> alloc
What Seth said; oppose 2014-18
/RjL
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
> > On 7/23/14, 7:58, ARIN wrote:
> > > On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
> > > "ARIN-prop-210 Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments" as a
> Draft Policy.
> > >
> > > Draft Policy ARI
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 9/2/14, 12:57, Derek Calanchini wrote:
>>
>>
>> If you had to guess, how long would you think before I can order up a
>> /22 (4 class C's) from Arin? I am trying to decide if I need to fudge
>> the truth and order up a /21
>
>
>
> Not to
On 9/3/14, 12:03, Martin Hannigan wrote:
So we should strand fragments and fail to adapt to the changing world
and rely on policy relics (multi homing) to deny people access to
address space?
I don't know what this means.
~Seth
___
PPML
You are rece
I agree with Seth. Oppose ARIN-2014-18.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 7/23/14, 7:58, ARIN wrote:
> > On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-210
> > Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments" as a Draft Policy.
> >
> > Draft Policy ARIN-2014-1
+1, I agree completely.
On 9/4/2014 午前 02:29, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 7/23/14, 7:58, ARIN wrote:
On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-210
Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments" as a Draft Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is below and can be found at:
ht
On 7/23/14, 7:58, ARIN wrote:
On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-210
Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments" as a Draft Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is below and can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_18.html
You are encouraged
On 9/2/14, 12:57, Derek Calanchini wrote:
If you had to guess, how long would you think before I can order up a
/22 (4 class C's) from Arin? I am trying to decide if I need to fudge
the truth and order up a /21
Not to be too pedantic, but you probably won't be able to get 4 class
C's even
Hello all,
If you had to guess, how long would you think before I can order
up a /22 (4 class C's) from Arin? I am trying to decide if I
need to fudge the truth and order up a /21
Best regards,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Christoph Blecker
wrote:
> I think the bigger problem is the concept as a whole.
>
> To qualify for a /24 (which will be the new minimum for end users and ISPs
> alike if the ARIN Board adopts 2014-13, which has been recommended to it),
> you need to justify the
I think the bigger problem is the concept as a whole.
To qualify for a /24 (which will be the new minimum for end users and ISPs
alike if the ARIN Board adopts 2014-13, which has been recommended to it),
you need to justify the use of 204 addresses in the next three months. This
is an extremely lo
On 14-07-24 08:35 AM, Christoph Blecker wrote:
Where this is in conflict with any other Section in the Policy Manual,
this Section shall be controlling.”
Could it be this line that is creating opposition?
I am in favor of allowing smaller allocations.. but maybe there are some
very specific ar
Opposed, based on reasons already provided in this thread.
Cheers,
Christoph
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:58 AM, ARIN wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-210
> Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments" as a Draft Policy.
>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Kevin Kargel wrote:
> I want one!
> Kevin
me too, and a pony please!
Opposed for the reasons that Gary has given.
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
I want one!
Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Gary Buhrmaster
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:10 PM
> To: Mike Burns
> Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draf
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> . How else are we going to get rid of the more than
> 1,000 /24s left as the dregs of decades of allocations?
Well, you could always reintroduce the proposal that
everyone who commented (on that proposal proposal)
would get a /24 given to t
-
From: Blake Dunlap
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:17 PM
To: ARIN
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net List
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying Minimum
Allocations and Assignments
Opposed, as I do not see the need to justify 200 addresses as enough
of a burden to outweigh
Opposed, as I do not see the need to justify 200 addresses as enough
of a burden to outweigh the benefits of not giving out /24s like candy
to those who cannot when coupled with the likely to be implemented
minimum /24 size allocation to an ORG.
The laws of physics cause this to be needed, due to
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:58 PM, ARIN wrote:
> On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-210
> Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments" as a Draft Policy.
>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is below and can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_18.ht
On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-210
Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments" as a Draft Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is below and can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_18.html
You are encouraged to discuss the merits and your
22 matches
Mail list logo