On 26 October 2014 16:51:43 GMT+08:00, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Then nothing due to no default console... edit
/boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf on the SD
append ro root=UUID=c078beec-18b2-44ae-aac5-e6fc275b45c5
console=ttyS0,115200 loglevel=8
Then he boots into firstboot on
On 26 October 2014 18:40:55 GMT+08:00, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
append ro root=UUID=c078beec-18b2-44ae-aac5-e6fc275b45c5
console=ttyS0,115200 loglevel=8
Then he boots into firstboot on serial console which is nice.
Ethernet
etc seems to work fine.
Couple more findings
-
On 26 October 2014 19:50:26 GMT+08:00, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
On 10/26/2014 07:33 AM, Andy Green wrote:
On 26 October 2014 18:40:55 GMT+08:00, Peter Robinson
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
append ro root=UUID=c078beec-18b2-44ae-aac5-e6fc275b45c5
console=ttyS0,115200
On 26 October 2014 20:18:39 GMT+08:00, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
On 10/26/2014 07:56 AM, Andy Green wrote:
On 26 October 2014 19:50:26 GMT+08:00, Robert Moskowitz
r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 10/26/2014 07:33 AM, Andy Green wrote:
On 26 October 2014 18:40:55 GMT+08:00
On 25 October 2014 17:58:33 GMT+08:00, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 02:47:39PM +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Today I tried the Fedora 21 alpha, it gave me the firstboot menu
on serial console.
That's good. It didn't happen on the Cubie when I tried Fedora
On 25 October 2014 09:32:53 GMT+08:00, Andy Green a...@warmcat.com wrote:
On 24 October 2014 16:15:18 GMT+08:00, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
It'd be great if folks could help out with the Beta RC1 testing. The
cloud images seem to be busted but everything else
On 24 October 2014 16:15:18 GMT+08:00, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
It'd be great if folks could help out with the Beta RC1 testing. The
cloud images seem to be busted but everything else is available for
testing, and Dennis will look into the Cloud issues tomorrow. In the
On 23 October 2014 11:41:05 GMT+08:00, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
On 10/22/2014 05:49 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
- Original Message -
I downloaded:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_TC4/Images/armhfp/Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-21_Beta-TC4-sda.raw.xz
And
On 23 October 2014 12:33:59 GMT+08:00, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
On 10/22/2014 11:49 PM, Andy Green wrote:
On 23 October 2014 11:41:05 GMT+08:00, Robert Moskowitz
r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 10/22/2014 05:49 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
- Original Message -
I
On 17 October 2014 17:28:03 GMT+08:00, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
The Non-US version of the Samsung Glaxy Note4 is powered by the
Exynos7, which is an Octa Core A57/A53 in big.LITTLE config.
Note4 with Qualcomm cpu is not US only device. So if you want to buy
it
with
On 9 September 2014 06:40:54 GMT+08:00, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
I do not have this behaviour on the Cubieboard2, just on my Cubietruck.
I thought it was a problem with the F21 build, but today I am working
with F19 remix:
Hi -
I have a headless cubieboard 2 running a 3.4 kernel that came with the board,
but a Fedora rootfs already.
It's been pretty workable, but now I need to compile an OOT kernel module, and
that's a big mess with the magic 3.4 kernel. The defconfig it was built with
has gone 404, although a
On 14 August 2014 19:55:03 GMT+08:00, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have a headless cubieboard 2 running a 3.4 kernel that came with
the
board, but a Fedora rootfs already.
It's been pretty workable, but now I need to compile an OOT kernel
module,
and that's a big mess
On 14 August 2014 20:45:07 GMT+08:00, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
For a change I can help!
Been here, done a few things...
On 08/14/2014 07:26 AM, Andy Green wrote:
Hi -
I have a headless cubieboard 2 running a 3.4 kernel that came with
the
board, but a Fedora rootfs
On 14 August 2014 22:38:15 GMT+08:00, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
On 08/14/2014 10:03 AM, Andy Green wrote:
On 14 August 2014 20:45:07 GMT+08:00, Robert Moskowitz
r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
For a change I can help!
Been here, done a few things...
On 08/14/2014 07:26 AM
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:27:38PM +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Yeah I think until you realize why and how it's a problem (in other
words, you got bitten) most programmers wouldn't particularly think
to defend against it because the code is c-legal
Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 12/27/2013 04:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:53:54AM +, Gordan Bobic wrote:
How is transparent alignment fixup going to give you back the
performance you lose from accesses straddling cache lines?
You can have structs
Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 12/30/2013 09:58 AM, Andy Green wrote:
Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 12/27/2013 04:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:53:54AM +, Gordan Bobic wrote:
How is transparent alignment fixup going to give you back
Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 12/30/2013 11:54 AM, Andy Green wrote:
Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 12/30/2013 09:58 AM, Andy Green wrote:
Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 12/27/2013 04:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:53:54AM
Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org wrote:
On 12/30/2013 07:54 PM, Andy Green wrote:
Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 12/30/2013 09:58 AM, Andy Green wrote:
Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
On 12/27/2013 04:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:53:54AM
On 04/09/13 17:33, the mail apparently from Peter Robinson included:
Hi All,
A quick update on the Bones. I have them now booting through to login...
WOO!
I was up until nearly 3am (woo to not being able to sleep) and I test
booted both devices only using Serial console. At the moment
On 04/09/2012 07:47 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Can someone with a spare F17 (ARMv5 or ARMv7) machine, a network
connection, and some sort of GUI capability try installing this package
of Anaconda?
I can't promise any of this will work or even run but I'd be interested
in
On 03/31/2012 09:28 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
What are the gnome-shell problems? Perhaps they're well known but I'm
not acquainted with them. If we're missing a package that will help
things out let me know and I'll put it in the next snapshot.
It's not deps afaict, a
On 03/31/2012 09:20 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On 03/30/2012 05:35 PM, Andy Green (林安廸) wrote:
It's great that you're doing this, but I don't think dding partition +
filesystems is a good idea.
It's definitely tricky to get right. The number of possible
configurations
On 03/30/2012 02:20 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi folks,
I've put together a script to create up-to-date F17 snapshot images and
am storing the result on my people page. These are based on Peter's F17
alpha1 images with the following changes:
There is a tarball
On 07/19/2011 07:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org
mailto:jonat...@jonmasters.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 14:38 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
---begin log---
jonmasters [14:38:01]
On 06/25/2011 12:18 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
You don't need to take so much care with Panda. The ROM in there
doesn't have the bugs that were present in OMAP3 that make this kind of
trouble.
Also Vladimir is talking about issues with x-loader, there is another
On 05/31/2011 09:36 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Can you put the ethernet and storage on different hubs? (it may not be..)
No, it's all on-board. No other hubs, all board-powered.
Or do you see similar crappy performance with the nic adapter
unplugged and unused?
I see
On 06/01/2011 09:56 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
Note: I get crappy performance with the network *up*, as long as
there's no traffic.
I had a go a reproducing this also on a 2.6.38-based kernel on Panda.
I was thinking it sounds a bit like USB suspend (not the same as
On 02/14/2011 03:43 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hello Everybody,
I have a beagleboard Rev C4 and when I try to load the kernel from
memory with bootm command, it shows me an error in the middle of loading
kernel. This is the error message:
Waiting 1sec before mounting
On 01/10/11 10:38, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
The compiler will always take care of that, unless someone does
something really evil in either the code or the gcc options.
s/will/should/ and I might agree. :)
LOL! Well, I am a gcc maintainer, so I have my own opinion
On 01/10/11 16:19, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Quoting Andy Greena...@warmcat.com:
On 01/10/11 12:23, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Even on x86 it may not always generate code that does what you want:
gcc is perfectly entitled to assume that an unaligned pointer
On 01/09/11 12:23, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Assuming you actually get your 10,000 erase cycles out of it - and that
is a big assumotion. I have seen a lot of consumer grade MLC flash fail
after a few dozen erases (USB sticks, CF cards). In general, if it
Actually with USB
On 01/09/11 17:15, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
What you are talking about is a Segfault release. like make rawhide,
This isn't a compile option that is distro-wide: you can add or edit a
line to your initscripts that pokes /proc how you like and you're
segfaulting away any time
On 01/09/11 16:07, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
What'd solve this really nicely is a /etc/kernel-update.d/ which has a
bunch of scripts that try to match based on /proc/cpuinfo. For example
on the board I am working on right now, it says in there
I believe the utils that the
On 01/07/11 10:40, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
It would appear that sha512sum is broken, at least in the F12 distro
(coreutils-7.6-5.fc12.fa1.armv5tel). It is producing a different hash
for the same file compared to what my x86 machines produce. This is
quite worrying and a
On 01/07/11 15:58, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
The results are definitely different when using the sha512sum from the
tar ball.
(/usr/src/arm/rootfs-f12 is a fresh, pristine tarball extract)
Where are our methods diverging?
Dunno, kernel is different though.
[r...@ivmon ~]#
Failed to send it to the list
Original Message
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] Broken sha512sum in coreutils
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:29:26 +
From: Andy Green a...@warmcat.com
Reply-To: a...@warmcat.com
To: Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net
On 01/07/11 16:15, Somebody in the thread
On 01/07/11 16:52, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
I wrote about the alignment issue here on ARM:
http://warmcat.com/_wp/2007/05/25/the-alignment-monster/
Aha, I know what you are talking about now, and I am aware of such
issues. Here is a similar article a friend of mine wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] Broken sha512sum in coreutils
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:36:37 +
From: Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net
To: a...@warmcat.com
Andy Green wrote:
On 01/07/11 16:15, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
[r...@sheeva ~]# cat
On 01/07/11 17:17, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
No, it's not the same issue.
On x86 as described on your link, it's just a performance penalty if
your members are not aligned. On ARM without fixup, you read actual
garbage as described on my article.
Yup, I was more referring
On 01/07/11 20:17, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On 01/07/2011 08:13 PM, Andy Green wrote:
counters haven't increased at all, my guess is that it all happened last
night when I was building/testing dietlibc stuff. I'll test that
hypothesis when the new kernel is built.
Fine
On 01/07/11 20:55, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
..snip..
I am inclined to think it might be compiler related. Andy's package is
the same version as mine, his works, mine does not. The only thing that
is likely to be different is the build environment.
That and the development
On 01/07/11 21:30, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
for points of reference.. qemu f12 with a different kernel and the
default gurplug install
results from qemu f12 with new kernel:
[r...@fedora-arm ~]# ./x
0x65646362
[r...@fedora-arm ~]# cat /proc/cpu/alignment
User: 0
On 01/06/11 16:17, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
Digging a bit more, it seems that bin-arm/diet segfaults when executed
without any parameters, so it seems that this is the bit that
miscompiled somewhere.
Did you try running it in gdb and get a clue about what blows?
It
On 12/30/10 18:26, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
One instance is when I tried to do the mkrootfs-13 on the guruplug
with the default software (apt-get yum rpmbuild etc) the checksums
couldn't be verified because the versions of python were different and
yum couldn't support
On 12/30/10 18:26, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
One instance is when I tried to do the mkrootfs-13 on the guruplug
with the default software (apt-get yum rpmbuild etc) the checksums
couldn't be verified because the versions of python were different and
yum couldn't support
On 12/30/10 21:37, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Quoting Andy Green a...@warmcat.com:
The quickest solution is uplevel your main rootfs to the f12 tarball
and do it from there with an rpm that understands xz already.
The fastest solution was to run the F12 vm since it took about
On 12/30/10 22:28, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
At that time the alternative it was being compared to was a real
532MHz ARM11 with 128MB of DDR, it was able to compile much faster
than the qemu box. This year there are Cortex A9 ARM boxes available
are much faster than that and
On 12/27/10 01:25, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi guys,
I want to turnoff some gpio's power on my board when it entered suspend
and when it resumed turnon the gpio.My codes is:
gpio_set_value(BABBAGE_POWER_ON, 0);
gpio_set_value(BABBAGE_POWER_ON, 1);
I want to know where can I
On 12/23/10 13:24, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
Thanks for sharing these steps.
You're welcome.
4) rpmbuild -ba --define binutils_target armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi
rpmbuild/SPECS/gcc.spec
6) rpmbuild -ba --define=cross_target armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi
On 12/22/10 13:35, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
Have you considered adding this info to the Fedora ARM wiki? It would
certainly be more accessible there than buried in a mailing list post
somewhere. If you're a Fedora packager, you may also look into hosting
RPMs of the
On 12/20/10 12:27, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
in the x86/x86_64 repositories. It seems like a reasonably important
package to have in the repository for the architecture that requires it. :)
FWIW I wrote a bash script for the Qi Bootloader that performs mkimage
without
On 12/18/10 19:29, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
�
Uncompressing
Linux.D�q)i-�:4URz2,#U(J-(5��i�]PH.Rj0Z(�J�i��da).�Jew��].�
Presumably it started booting
On 12/16/10 05:47, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
1.The rootfs is fedora12 which is for arm I download from offical website.
2.I used serial port on my PC to connect my board(freescale imx5) and I
boot my board through NFS Server.
3.I am using Fedora13 on my PC.
4.I am using
On 12/13/10 10:25, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
If this is all you're trying to do --
Is there any working public repository which I can use to create a
root filesystem for Fedora 12?
If not then how can this be fixed?
... then take a look at this script
On 12/01/10 18:37, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
I don't disagree with a split, but what concerns me is we don't have
enough resources to get F13-ARM out the door, much less two versions of
the distro. We don't have enough people nor the hardware to pull it off.
Hi -
Here are updates I just got working of Lennert and David's patches
against current rawhide gcc and binutils:
binutils-2.20.51.0.12-2.fc15.src.rpm
gcc-4.5.1-5.fc15.src.rpm
which generate updated binutils and gcc cross packages. The old ones
are fine except that they're no longer able
On 08/03/10 12:02, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
The original is 1560 the extracted is only 686, it just because it's
stripped though
And stripping it by hand doesn't set the machine type to None?
Can you re-try the whole build and see if it screws up again (or did
you try
On 07/21/10 11:58, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Finally I got the SDHC card to mount as rootfs.. again it was a f***ed
u-boot thingy. As it seems it is important that rootdelay=10 is set
*after *root=0811. rootfstype does not matter at all
Hi -
U-Boot's environment concept
On 03/19/10 10:46, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
After disabling the blacklist for nss, and prelinking the whole rootfs,
there is still a list of bad guys, these seem that they could be
Fedora packaging / building errors?
In terms of packages that matter to me, it's only these
Hi -
I wrote back in September that prelink was not available, the last days
I studied it more closely and made some progress.
Prelink builds OK but fails some of its tests in the Makefile. But when
I looked at the tests, it seemed that they were failing either due to
problems with the tests
On 03/04/10 19:04, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
I think the floodgates are about to open on many categories of ARM
devices. I wonder if this thing has the RAM to run Fedora well, though?
RAM is a really good point, I think it will be in the ballpark of 256
It depends what
63 matches
Mail list logo
