>The router of the wifi network uses DHCP to give IP to connected
>devices.
Configure the DHCP server to allocate a fixed IP address to the RPi
(based on its MAC address, which is now constant). Then you will know
what address to use with ssh.
___
arm
> Dear All, to upgrade a Raspberry 3 I executed this commands
>
> sudo dnf -y upgrade --refresh
> sudo dnf -y install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
> sudo dnf -y system-upgrade download --releasever=30
> sudo dnf -y system-upgrade reboot
>
> after the reboot dnf fails. Is anyone else having
>I don't think it's a kernel problem, possibly a dnf cache issue,
I too think it is not likely to be a kernel problem. A dnf cache problem
also seems unlikely - each try retrieved new copies of the package files
from a mirror, then failed in the same way. After the reboot, I think
the dnf cache
I tried again, with the same results for the three packages:
kexec-tools-2.0.17-2.fc28.armv7hl.rpm
httpd-2.4.33-5.fc28.armv7hl.rpm
brltty-5.6-10.fc28.armv7hl.rpm
I rebooted the Raspberry Pi and now the upgrade works smoothly. The
kernel where it did not work was:
> I can manually configure my Raspberry Pi model 3B-plus on-board wired
> Ethernet port to operate. It is indeed only DHCP configuration that
> fails, but only with the on-board device; DHCP configuration of a USB
> wired Ethernet port works fine.
>
> Have you tried the 4.16.0-300 kernel
I can manually configure my Raspberry Pi model 3B-plus on-board wired
Ethernet port to operate. It is indeed only DHCP configuration that
fails, but only with the on-board device; DHCP configuration of a USB
wired Ethernet port works fine.
Curious.
>Why disable SELinux?
It does not provide any significant value for my Raspberry Pi computer
intended for use as an embedded system or in a DACS role, where network
security is important but a simple (root or user) local privilege scheme
is fine. The goals of SELinux are important, but its rocky
I used Fedora-Workstation-28-20180402.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz and can boot
successfully on my Raspberry Pi model 3B-plus. I used:
fedora-arm-image-installer --target=rpi3 --media=/dev/sdi --norootpass
--resizefs --selinux=off
--image=fedora/F28/Fedora-Workstation-28-20180402.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
to
See Peter Robinson's post on March 23, 2018, at 10:42 PM that details how
to copy the Raspberry Pi device tree file for the model 3+.
___
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561184
___
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
After booting an image such as
Fedora-Workstation-armhfp-28-20180324.n.0-sda.raw.xz
on a Raspberry Pi model 3, the First Boot process completes, but no
graphical login screen appears. The system becomes unresponsive after a
graphical pointer arrow is displayed (on top of whatever text was
>I tried an image I has never used before
>(Fedora-KDE-armhfp-28-20180325.n.0-sda.raw.xz). And it works.
Good to hear. It seems only gdm (or maybe gnome-shell) is broken (fails
to display the graphical login screen.) I just tried the LXDE image
Fedora-LXDE-armhfp-28-20180325.n.0-sda.raw.xz and
Did you change the default boot target from graphical.target to
mult-user.target? That is what I had to do to avoid the problem with
graphical login to my RPi.
Of course, without a working network connection, you might feel it is not
worth the bother, but my machine boots OK to a text console
Thank you, Peter Robinson, your instructions worked beautifully.
Perhaps this will not work with the aarch64 version used by Tomáš Frolík,
but you already explained in an earlier post why there is little reason
to use that on a Raspberry Pi.
I used the following to install on a SD card:
>There is an accepted blocker for selinux issues on the disk images,
SELINUX=permissive in my case, therefore I believe that should not be the
problem here.
>Workstation is a bit sluggish with 1G of RAM.
Yes, but if I access the machine with ssh (and do not use the local
graphical desktop) it
Using a Raspberry Pi model 3.
28-20180319 boots fine to multi-user, but fails to start the graphical
desktop. A pointer is displayed (in the middle of the text screen
containing the last of the boot messages), but the graphical login screen
does not appear. The same Raspberry Pi with the same
>Which device? I'm presuming a RPi of some sort
Sorry. Yes, a Raspberry Pi model 3 (not the new 3+).
>I suspect [a monitor with a HDMI interface]
Just so. OK, a little cryptic, but innocuous. Thank you.
___
arm mailing list --
Problem or just noise? "dnf upgrade" succeeded today (260+ packages
updated, seems like a lot for a one-day-old build, but this may simply be
a busy time.) System was booted to multi-user target after upgrade, this
message was generated at login time (but login succeeded, and journalctl
captured
>I'm undecided whether I want to do the related work to get this support
>into F-27.
With F28 beta just a week or two away, I suggest that is the appropriate
target.
___
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
F27 will not boot on the new Model 3+. Green LED blinks 4 times
(medium), then 4 times (fast), then repeats. The colored splash screen
is displayed.
Might this be just a device tree problem? Raspbian journal contains a line:
raspberrypi kernel: OF: fdt:Machine model: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B
You might try Fedberry. I uncommented "dtparam=spi=on" in
/boot/config.txt and now see the /dev/spidev0.0 and /dev/spidev0.1
devices. The GPIO devices (gpiochip0, gpiochip1, and gpiochip2) are
present by default, without any special configuration.
With F27, uncertain about what device tree
It is definitely a good idea to check the system journal. If something
wrong is recorded there, there are likely many instances logged to cause
hours of unexpected delay.
I find it better to use ssh to connect to my RPi than to suffer its slow
graphics performance. Time information for a 'dnf
>This is where I put my grumpy hat on.
Not grumpy, and it is no slur to call you realistic.
(I would even venture to think you optimistic.)
Thank you for cogent words about the Peter Robinson world.
___
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
"dnf upgrade" has installed many new kernels on my Raspberry Pi.
___
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
If nothing looks more promising, try a different display. I have
experienced a problem that resembles yours when I tried to use a modern
Dell 4K resolution (8 megapixel) display with my RPi 3. An older display
(without 4K capability) works. I have not tried my high resolution
display recently,
>compressed *.raw.xz images which must be unpacked (at least under
>windows) to write on SD card.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils provides links to programs that
should expand the .xz file on a Windows system. The expanded
file is what must be copied to a SD card and used in an ARM
If the slowdown is due to log writes, what is written into your journal?
It may be awkward to access the journal using the RPi, but move the SD
card to another Fedora system (many laptops have flash card readers built
in, or use a USB device) and a "smoking gun" may be obvious. The journal
I understood, will report as you suggested later today. Too many balls
in the air right now.
>The display and initial-setup should come up even with the module
>blacklisted (perhaps not on workstation, not tested there), you lose some
>performance but it should be very usable.
I did want to
>>> In order to boot F26 on a Raspberry Pi, it is necessary to blacklist the
>>> vc4 module to avoid a kernel failure
>>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387733). This means the
>>
>>Hopefully this is no longer the case. On the 20170416 nightly images[1] I
>>didn't need to blacklist
>> In order to boot F26 on a Raspberry Pi, it is necessary to blacklist the
>> vc4 module to avoid a kernel failure
>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387733). This means the
>
>Hopefully this is no longer the case. On the 20170416 nightly images[1] I
>didn't need to blacklist on my
Running on Raspberry Pi 3, with updates to April 19:
[ryniker@RPi3-2 ~]$ uname -a
Linux RPi3-2 4.11.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc26.armv7hl #1 SMP Mon Apr 3 21:06:36 UTC
2017 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
[ryniker@RPi3-2 ~]$ /usr/bin/python3.6 --version
Python detected LC_CTYPE=C: LC_ALL & LANG coerced to
>Yes, there's python3-libsoc which should support the RPi.
libsoc uses the old, deprecated sysfs interface to access GPIO resources
from user space. I wrote a Python module to use the newer, file
descriptor ioctl interface. See:
http://ryniker.org/raspberrypi/Fedora/gpiofd.py
I welcome
newaliases is part of the sendmail package. exim does not use
the binary (compiled) alias data that newaliases creates for sendmail,
but exim provides a newaliases file that does nothing so that users who
install exim do not have to change any scripts they may have that modify
the aliases file
Additional problem on Raspberry Pi (model 3): there is no:
/sys/class/gpio
This does exist with the 4.8.15-300 kernel, but it has problems:
[root@RPi3-1 gpiochip970]# echo 993 >/sys/class/gpio/export
[root@RPi3-1 gpiochip970]# echo 1 > /sys/class/gpio/gpio993/value
bash: echo: write error:
4.9.2 does not appear to do much good. The blank screen problem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387733
continues, and the
kernel: i2c-bcm2835 3f805000.i2c: i2c transfer timed out
message still appears in the journal.
The following document my experience:
Thank you, that provides a welcome solution. The Fedora case is
slightly different:
[ryniker@RPi3-1 ~]$ ls /sys/class/gpio
export gpiochip970 unexport
[ryniker@RPi3-1 ~]$ cat /sys/class/gpio/gpiochip970/base
970
Now the following works (at least there is no complaint; I
I believe GPIO is broken because the Raspbery Pi hardware platform is not
correctly recognized, but I have not had available time to look
carefully.
[root@RPi3-1 ryniker]# uname -a
Linux RPi3-1 4.8.4-301.fc25.armv7hl #1 SMP Tue Oct 25 02:01:39 UTC 2016 armv7l
armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
Simple test
Firefox (firefox.x86_64 49.0.2-1.fc24 @updates) complains (create
an exception to allow Fedora to access the site)...
https://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/compose/25/Fedora-25-20161117.0/compose/
Peer’s Certificate issuer is not recognized.
HTTP Strict Transport Security: false
HTTP Public Key
Sylvain Pasche on Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:47:40 wrote:
>My current workaround is just to blacklist vc4 (if that can help someone):
>echo blacklist vc4 > /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-vc4.conf
That gives me a console on my RPi3, eliminates the "i2c-bcm2835
3f805000.i2c: i2c transfer
Two more trials without any improvement:
Using kernel-4.9.0-0.rc2.git0.2.fc26 does not help. I had no reason to
think it would, but now that ssh to my RPi3 works well, it was easy to
try.
Changing the display to a Dell P2415Q (3840x2160 resolution, HDMI
input) does not help. Again,
Peter Robinson on Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:23:13 wrote:
>There's a new 4.8.4-301.fc25 kernel that I think should fix this issue
No improvement with this new kernel. I set default to multi-user.target
in an attempt to avoid any X11 confusion. After several screens of boot
Peter Robinson wrote on Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:18:00:
>Can you just provide the output of dmesg?
Yes, below, but it was a chore. How does one execute dmesg when there is
no accessible user? The system boots far enough to initialize the
Ethernet connection, and sshd is
Boots (a few screens of messages) but fails to run first boot user setup.
There appears to be some confusion about the output display (HDMI
connection) though it worked through u-boot and beyond the switch to
framebuffer for additional line output.
Journalctl output (from the 2016.10.18 nightly)
43 matches
Mail list logo