I also want to apologize for how horribly intimidating those sets of
parenthesizes must be for one whom has never seen one of those used
like that before outside of advanced and very nerd-y philosophy xD
On 4/17/17, John Luke Gibson wrote:
> Yes, however don't discount
Well, in this context artificial is often meant to describe scarcity
which is the result of a decision. I would probably adapt that
definition for my purposes, to say a decision made by an identifiable
mint (a whole decision by a group or a decision partially weighted in
favor of any group) on
Why do you want artificial scarcity of addresses? Either via bitcoin type
system or some authority I don't see any benefit to artificial address scarcity.
Original Message
From: eaterjo...@gmail.com
Sent: April 16, 2017 8:45 PM
To: arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
Reply-to:
On 04/16/2017 06:53 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 10:56 PM, zap wrote:
>> something interesting I saw is that in the update picking a processor,
>> it shows rk3188 as the rockchip processor you were going to reverse
>> engineer. on the
El 16 de abril de 2017 a las 12:42:43, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
(l...@lkcl.net) escribió:
> ---
> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:05 AM, GaCuest wrote:
> > El 14 de abril de 2017 a las 7:37:24, Luke Kenneth Casson
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 10:56 PM, zap wrote:
> something interesting I saw is that in the update picking a processor,
> it shows rk3188 as the rockchip processor you were going to reverse
> engineer. on the other hand, your rhombus-tech link shows that your
> looking at
something interesting I saw is that in the update picking a processor,
it shows rk3188 as the rockchip processor you were going to reverse
engineer. on the other hand, your rhombus-tech link shows that your
looking at rk3288?
Not to be annoying constantly, but I am curious are you looking at one
On 04/16/2017 12:58 PM, zap wrote:
>
> On 04/16/2017 06:35 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 4:08 AM, zap wrote:
>>> Just one question,
>> sure.
>>
>>> I am assuming since there will be internal sd cards
>> yes.
>>
>>> that your
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:42:01AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > Something like this?:
> > http://hands.com/~lkcl/eoma/shenzen/frida/FRD3504503.pdf
>
> ... exactly like that :) except i'm not a huge fan of resistive
> panels... they are quite a lot cheaper though.
That's just
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Pablo wrote:
>> it's actually incredibly straightforward to get a Card set up with a new OS:
>> https://wiki.debian.org/ArmHardFloatChroot
>>
>> err... then...
> it's actually incredibly straightforward to get a Card set up with a new OS:
> https://wiki.debian.org/ArmHardFloatChroot
>
> err... then... err... copy that to a MicroSD card and... err.. that's
> it. done.
It is true that there has been (heated) discussions about what kind of
image
God damn NDAs. And it really is a common design too, chinese companies are
basically slapping logos on the same chassis. That is unfortunate, the
situation you describe.
On 16 April 2017 16:01:43 GMT+03:00, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 12:42 PM,
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Allan Mwenda wrote:
> Just gonna ask here coz I'm too lazy.
:)
> How hard would it be to repurpose one of these cheap $200 macbook clone
> things with intel atoms to take an eoma68 card instead? I can already
> imagine the rockchip one
Just gonna ask here coz I'm too lazy.
How hard would it be to repurpose one of these cheap $200 macbook clone things
with intel atoms to take an eoma68 card instead? I can already imagine the
rockchip one in it :)
On 16 April 2017 10:14:42 GMT+03:00, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
The fact that its a Pi already nukes freedom, otherwise nice idea
On 14 April 2017 08:00:52 GMT+03:00, Louis Pearson
wrote:
>https://hackaday.io/project/19035-zerophone-a-raspberry-pi-smartphone
>
>Not exactly a netbook, but this looks like an interesting project. How
The fact that its a Pi already nukes freedom, otherwise nice idea
On 14 April 2017 08:00:52 GMT+03:00, Louis Pearson
wrote:
>https://hackaday.io/project/19035-zerophone-a-raspberry-pi-smartphone
>
>Not exactly a netbook, but this looks like an interesting project. How
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:05 AM, GaCuest wrote:
> El 14 de abril de 2017 a las 7:37:24, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> (l...@lkcl.net) escribió:
>> the idea there is to use an LCD that has *dual*
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 4:08 AM, zap wrote:
> Just one question,
sure.
> I am assuming since there will be internal sd cards
yes.
> that your replacing
> one or both of the internal usbs?
no.
> or am I wrong?
removing the TSSOP-48 *NAND* IC, which leaves tracks
https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68/micro-desktop/updates/taiwan-micro-desktop-casework-laptop-pcb1-and-a20
ok so i'm almost ready to send the laptop pcb1 and pcb4 off for
prototyping, this gets about 20% the way towards getting the laptop
done, but also is planned to be the basis of a new housing
19 matches
Mail list logo