RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-02 Thread Dasun Abeysekera
as you may be. Take care, Dasun To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:03:58 -0800 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality Dasun/ Chord, I think one of you posed an audio piece

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-02 Thread Padmini Murthy
as final by any means. Let us discuss and debate because I am learning and expanding as much as you may be. Take care, Dasun -- To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:03:58 -0800 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-01 Thread Arijit Debnath
are certainly entitled to your opinion; I hope that clarifies my point of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) Take care, Dasun -- To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-02-01 Thread Padmini Murthy
opinion; I hope that clarifies my point of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) Take care, Dasun -- To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation

RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-31 Thread Dasun Abeysekera
of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) Take care, Dasun To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality Dasun says Roja, along

RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-31 Thread arr pavan
of view. Good stuff..let's keep expanding. :) Take care, Dasun - To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:05:32 +0530 Subject: Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-29 Thread Shah Navas
Dasun says Roja, along with the likes of Puthiya Mugham, Uzhavan, and Bombay would qualify as some of the most soulful and brilliantly crafted albums, but, not the most original. Dasun, I request you to elaborate on this. I don't have any music knowledge. But I see 'Thee Thee' from 'Thiruda

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-28 Thread Moin Ali
agreed to all your comments Chord; but i think he is still as innovative as he was before. however, i think he used to experiment more with synthesizers\instruments before and now he is considering melody and voices more. Chord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, let me modify my post

RE: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-28 Thread Dasun Abeysekera
Thanks to all for the responses. Purevibz, you pretty much wrote the prelude to part II of my essay. I agree, innovativeness may have been a better word than originality, because as you would understand from reading the second part, his music still flows from the origin of all life, and

Re: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part I - Originality

2008-01-27 Thread Gomzy
well I feel thats nonsense. You can see his original works in earth then onto lagaan and then upto swades atleast. Not to mention water ! On Jan 28, 2008 12:08 PM, : Avinash : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Dasun.. That's really well thought, in depth writeup man. You really stole my words! :)