Hi Listers,
we got a physical load balancer before the Mid-Tier servers and a logical load
balancer between the Mid Tier and our AR Servers.
We noticed that on some days all the users land on only one AR Server. On other
days two. What’s the reason behind it? What do we need to configure and to
Thomas,
You'll need to work with the LB team to identify what distribution method
they are usingcommon options are 'round robin' in which it just simply
points everything at each server in turn, 'least connections' where it
tries to analyze how many are 'currently' connected to each node and se
Hey LJ and thank you for the prompt reply.
Talked to them already. We’re using round robin. I’m not an expert on LB but my
understanding was that we would have about an equal amount of users on all AR
Servers using it.
The guy explained that once you connect there is a time out of 180 seconds.
I've always preferred to use least connections personally, but from what
I've read of the docs they recommend round robinbut round robin doesn't
explain how your LB would be putting everyone on one node...it should
literally go 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3 for new connections, and as you discussed,
keep yo
There isn't much can be done in mid tier.this is purely LB team need to
analyse what is going wrong . Need to sit with them and see why all the
connections are going to one server in reality with the help of logs.. we
had strange problem recently that on 2 AR servers we used to see same set
of user
>From the Mid-Tier side, you also might want to review your setttings as
described here to work with the load balancer settings:
https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/ars81/Configuring+the+mid+tier+connection+pool
https://docs.bmc.com/docs/brid91/en/configuring-the-mid-tier-connection-pool-610
I reviewed that info before posting here but don’t really see room for change.
Do you?
> On Feb 1, 2018, at 5:43 PM, Randeep Atwal wrote:
>
> From the Mid-Tier side, you also might want to review your setttings as
> described here to work with the load balancer settings:
>
> https://docs.bmc.
While on this subject, and I apologize for the hijack.
We currently have our midtiers load balanced as well as our apptiers.
The apptiers and midtier load balancing uses sticky bit.
If we do not close our browsers and try to log on after sessions expire we get
dumped into the midtier AR a
No, that's gonna be your Mid-Tier LB that's doing that...maybe not the LB
itself, but the login is most certainly at the MT level, not the app level.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Kevin M Candelaria
wrote:
>
>
> While on this subject, and I apologize for the hijack.
>
>
>
> We currently have
They don’t have logging running because of the massive data load. But the LB
guy sent me the attached screenshot saying that it shows that all three nodes
get an equal amount of requests.
If they really do, the I wonder why on one of the nodes I only see 2, 3 users
and and on the others an equa
I'll also use this thread as an opportunity for a new discussion related to
load balancing.
Is anybody aware of any docs that pertain to load balancing Jetty on AR
Server? The REST API has been hosed here for a few years but that wasn't
user-facing (but should be able to setup redundancy). The new
Node 3 seems to be used 50% more than node 1, but agreed that everything
seems like it's getting traffic
You still haven't identified what sort of monitor is in use, and if node 1
goes down/offline at any point...I'll give you a scenario
all 3 getting normal load, but node 1 goes offline, eit
Thomas,
Connection != User
You’re talking about technical users. Maybe some interfaces, which uses the
same technical user and therefore you’ll see that many connections.
You should be able to see (without the help of the LB Guys), how many
connections are directed to each backend by using nets
Hi,
So if you have say 4 mid-tiers and 4 remedy-servers and 100 users.
The first load balancer will dirstribute the 100 users to something like 25 per
mid-tier server.
The load balancer between mid-tiers and the remedy-servers will see only 4
"users", which is the 4 mid-tiers. It is not inposs
The 9.1.04 Dev Studio does not permit a duplicate field name to be entered.
Dev Studio is enhanced so that a red small msg is displayed saying duplicate
field – nice improvement over only replacing your typing with what was there
before.
I note that I tried this on a regular form. Perhaps
well, the obvious thing is to change one to a different name and hit save,
then try to change it back...which it won't allowI, like you, have no
idea how they would have gotten into that situation in the first place.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Ben Chernys <
ben.cher...@softwaretoolhouse.
But you can see in the screenshot that the maximum for each is in the 30's,
so from that it seems to me that the LB is able to recognize unique
individuals coming across and not treating the Mid-Tier server as a whole
as a single userbut I do agree with you that there is 0 reason to have
the 3
Jason,
You are correct, Jetty running on port 8008, or whatever port they are on
certainly needs it's own LB depending on the need of the client in place.
If HA is needed, LB makes sense. Regardless of if you are talking about
Remedy Restful services or CMDB Restful services...depending on the HA
Dear All,
Impact Analysis option is loading
continuously in change request (CR) relationship tab. unable to relate any
other CI from change request (CR) -> Relationship Tab -> Impact Analysis.
We need your help to address this loading issue.
AR system version is v9.03
Atrium CMDB version is v9.0
I think the duplicate field name would be possible only when we update field
meta data from the database directly bypassing AR APIs. Only a guess, but
archgid is one tool that updates field-ids directly in database, so some
scenario could have caused it to mis-behave causing inconsistenty that
20 matches
Mail list logo