RE: FYI: Duplicate Field Names in 9.1.00 201512160229 possible - view created "OK"

I think the duplicate field name would be possible only when we update field meta data from the database directly bypassing AR APIs. Only a guess, but archgid is one tool that updates field-ids directly in database, so some scenario could have caused it to mis-behave causing inconsistenty that

CMDB Impact Analysis option is not working to relate the CI to the CR

Dear All, Impact Analysis option is loading continuously in change request (CR) relationship tab. unable to relate any other CI from change request (CR) -> Relationship Tab -> Impact Analysis. We need your help to address this loading issue. AR system version is v9.03 Atrium CMDB version is

Re: OT: Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

Jason, You are correct, Jetty running on port 8008, or whatever port they are on certainly needs it's own LB depending on the need of the client in place. If HA is needed, LB makes sense. Regardless of if you are talking about Remedy Restful services or CMDB Restful services...depending on the HA

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

But you can see in the screenshot that the maximum for each is in the 30's, so from that it seems to me that the LB is able to recognize unique individuals coming across and not treating the Mid-Tier server as a whole as a single userbut I do agree with you that there is 0 reason to have the 3

Re: FYI: Duplicate Field Names in 9.1.00 201512160229 possible - view created "OK"

well, the obvious thing is to change one to a different name and hit save, then try to change it back...which it won't allowI, like you, have no idea how they would have gotten into that situation in the first place. On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Ben Chernys <

RE: FYI: Duplicate Field Names in 9.1.00 201512160229 possible - view created "OK"

The 9.1.04 Dev Studio does not permit a duplicate field name to be entered. Dev Studio is enhanced so that a red small msg is displayed saying duplicate field – nice improvement over only replacing your typing with what was there before. I note that I tried this on a regular form. Perhaps

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

Hi, So if you have say 4 mid-tiers and 4 remedy-servers and 100 users. The first load balancer will dirstribute the 100 users to something like 25 per mid-tier server. The load balancer between mid-tiers and the remedy-servers will see only 4 "users", which is the 4 mid-tiers. It is not

AW: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

Thomas, Connection != User You’re talking about technical users. Maybe some interfaces, which uses the same technical user and therefore you’ll see that many connections. You should be able to see (without the help of the LB Guys), how many connections are directed to each backend by using

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

Node 3 seems to be used 50% more than node 1, but agreed that everything seems like it's getting traffic You still haven't identified what sort of monitor is in use, and if node 1 goes down/offline at any point...I'll give you a scenario all 3 getting normal load, but node 1 goes offline,

OT: Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

I'll also use this thread as an opportunity for a new discussion related to load balancing. Is anybody aware of any docs that pertain to load balancing Jetty on AR Server? The REST API has been hosed here for a few years but that wasn't user-facing (but should be able to setup redundancy). The

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

They don’t have logging running because of the massive data load. But the LB guy sent me the attached screenshot saying that it shows that all three nodes get an equal amount of requests. If they really do, the I wonder why on one of the nodes I only see 2, 3 users and and on the others an

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

No, that's gonna be your Mid-Tier LB that's doing that...maybe not the LB itself, but the login is most certainly at the MT level, not the app level. On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Kevin M Candelaria wrote: > > > While on this subject, and I apologize for the hijack. > > > >

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

While on this subject, and I apologize for the hijack. We currently have our midtiers load balanced as well as our apptiers. The apptiers and midtier load balancing uses sticky bit. If we do not close our browsers and try to log on after sessions expire we get dumped into the midtier AR

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

I reviewed that info before posting here but don’t really see room for change. Do you? > On Feb 1, 2018, at 5:43 PM, Randeep Atwal wrote: > > From the Mid-Tier side, you also might want to review your setttings as > described here to work with the load balancer settings:

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

>From the Mid-Tier side, you also might want to review your setttings as described here to work with the load balancer settings: https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/ars81/Configuring+the+mid+tier+connection+pool

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

There isn't much can be done in mid tier.this is purely LB team need to analyse what is going wrong . Need to sit with them and see why all the connections are going to one server in reality with the help of logs.. we had strange problem recently that on 2 AR servers we used to see same set of

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

I've always preferred to use least connections personally, but from what I've read of the docs they recommend round robinbut round robin doesn't explain how your LB would be putting everyone on one node...it should literally go 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3 for new connections, and as you discussed, keep

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

Hey LJ and thank you for the prompt reply. Talked to them already. We’re using round robin. I’m not an expert on LB but my understanding was that we would have about an equal amount of users on all AR Servers using it. The guy explained that once you connect there is a time out of 180 seconds.

Re: Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

Thomas, You'll need to work with the LB team to identify what distribution method they are usingcommon options are 'round robin' in which it just simply points everything at each server in turn, 'least connections' where it tries to analyze how many are 'currently' connected to each node and

Loadbalancer traffic distribution question

Hi Listers, we got a physical load balancer before the Mid-Tier servers and a logical load balancer between the Mid Tier and our AR Servers. We noticed that on some days all the users land on only one AR Server. On other days two. What’s the reason behind it? What do we need to configure and