-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of John Baker
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 4:50 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ARS Wiki
I frequently find myself browsing the MSDN docs and Google is my friend,
becaus
I frequently find myself browsing the MSDN docs and Google is my friend,
because it is good at searching web pages and PDFs. I don't use the MSDN search
tool.
The problem Warren highlighted in his original post was searching. Yet, I need
a support login for the BMC docs and hence Google can't
I have to be the voice of dissent here. I actually like the documents.
Granted, they were a BIG pain to install locally (which seems to be a need
with my co-workers) just because of the size. And I found it amusing since
I was looking at the files while they were being copied to the server and
t
I so wanted to say some need a snickers !
Your such a diva when your hungry
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
om: Brock, Anne [mailto:anne_br...@bmc.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
I believe the wiki was used for all the ITSM 8.0 beta customers, so we got
feedback through that as well.
I am personally a big fan of locally stored PDFs; but once I learned out to
create complex one
are in general not
based on Remedy specific experiences.
Thanks,
Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:52 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: A
scussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Easter, David
> *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2012 2:33 PM
>
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: ARS Wiki
>
> **
>
> https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/ars8000/PDFs
>
> ** **
>
st@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
I believe you can download the entire set of docs and load it on your own web
server
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:05
ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:05 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
Allow me to summarize: Get Over It! (David Easter may need to add a new verse
to his song).
I first encountered the wiki form of documentation for ADDM, and it never
seemed to
AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
David,
Let's see...
BMC discussed the idea of changing to wiki based documentation at WWRUG 2011 in
the general session (I
know because I discussed it). And, this has been talked about in User Groups
and other gatherings in the
year since
rt to .pdf constantly blows up when I try it
Lol Daniel
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: November 2, 2012 12:52 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
David,
Let's see.
BMC dis
e the best doc experience possible.
Doug Mueller
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David M. Clark
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 9:38 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
ARS 8 was released September 20, correct? So
IST.ORG
cc
Subject
ARS Wiki
**
I've been banging my head against this new WIKI for a few weeks now. Does
anyone else find it to be a painful process when looking for current
documentation?
Why can't we just have 1 web page that has all product documentation?
--
Warren R.
, November 02, 2012 11:40 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
FYI, the wiki documentation was demonstrated at WWRUG11. It looked pretty cool
at the demonstration and since we're not on V8 I haven't had the need to use
the real thing yet.
From: Action Request System discussion li
Something about Colbert and bears comes to mind...
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Shellman, David
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:41 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
As with many things I am sure that there
ehalf Of David M. Clark
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:38 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
ARS 8 was released September 20, correct? So asking for opinions on the change
a month later at RUG isn't what I'm suggesting. I'm asking if proper
consultatio
Clark
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 9:38 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
ARS 8 was released September 20, correct? So asking for opinions on the change
a month later at RUG isn't what I'm suggesting. I'm asking if proper
consultation with the developer communit
Apparently not, given
the current discussion.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Shellman, David
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:30 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
AT WWRUG12, BMC/Remedy was formally asking peopl
lf Of David M. Clark
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:27 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
Just curious... anyone here remember being asked their opinion on this change
in format prior to them doing it? That would seem like a good idea.
From: Action Request System discussion
AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
As I said. I prefer the OLD PDF documentation.
Dave
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG]<mailto:[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG]> On Behalf Of
patrick zand
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
>> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *patrick zandi
>> *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2012 11:32 AM
>>
>> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>> *Subject:* Re: ARS Wiki
>>
>> ** Dave:
>> the
sion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *patrick zandi
> *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2012 11:32 AM
>
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: ARS Wiki
>
> ** Dave:
> the new problem is the references in the PDF's point to links on the
As I said. I prefer the OLD PDF documentation.
Dave
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of patrick zandi
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:32 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
** Dave:
the
lace
> and clearly identified by name.
>
> Dave
> --
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Warren R. Baltimore II
> *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2012 10:52 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re:
012 10:52 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wiki
**
I get the sharing aspect of it, but the problem is that it is neither intuitive
or fully baked (a BMC specialty if you ask me). It shouldn't take me an hour
to find documentation and finally have to submit a helpdesk ticket to do so.
I get the sharing aspect of it, but the problem is that it is neither
intuitive or fully baked (a BMC specialty if you ask me). It shouldn't
take me an hour to find documentation and finally have to submit a helpdesk
ticket to do so. And then, they send me the wrong thing because obviously,
they
Hi Warren. The Wiki takes some getting used to. I agree, it's painful, but
it's very useful.
I'll be reading something one day and then won't be able to find it a
couple of days later. And, they seem to be adding things as we go along. I
swear, there has been very useful information about 8.0 adde
ROFL !!! yeah.. it is a royal.. and not jelly..
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Warren R. Baltimore II <
warrenbaltim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> **
> I've been banging my head against this new WIKI for a few weeks now. Does
> anyone else find it to be a painful process when looking for current
> d
28 matches
Mail list logo
