able of RR people was pretty solid.
/tp
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Roger Justice
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 12:09 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wikipedia page
**
Since I did a Rapid Results at BMC it
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wikipedia page
**
Tim – Good point on Rapid Results… it was unbelievably popular. Such a good
idea. Customers always would come back for more services later anyway. I
heard complaints about Rapid Results over the years (not from customers, but
Remedy people) which can
: Re: ARS Wikipedia page
**
Tim – Good point on Rapid Results… it was unbelievably popular. Such a good
idea. Customers always would come back for more services later anyway. I
heard complaints about Rapid Results over the years (not from customers, but
Remedy people) which can essentially be
list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 4:27 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wikipedia page
**
Having learnt some development in the SNOW platform, I agree, that the ARS has
much more richer development and
27 pm
Subject: Re: ARS Wikipedia page
**
Having learnt some development in the SNOWplatform, I agree, that the ARS has
much more richer development and moreimportantly customization capabilities
when compared to SNOW. The downslide canmostly therefore be attributed to BMC
not acknowledging the pow
(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Warren R. Baltimore II
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 12:45 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS Wikipedia page
**
I think we can probably assume this is just inline with the decision way back
when to not market the ARSystem by itself
It was enjoyable to listen to the discussion as those edits were happening.
😀
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:26 PM LJ LongWing wrote:
> **
> I looked again the other day.those edits were finally pulled out by
> someone earlier this year.and BTWdrinks had nothing to do with my
> participa
I looked again the other day.those edits were finally pulled out by
someone earlier this year.and BTWdrinks had nothing to do with my
participation in that particular endeavor
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Dave Shellman
wrote:
> **
> I seem to remember a couple of guys making a
Not being an active party in the change but aware of it, I checked the
article in question just this morning to see if those edits were still
there (they had been last year). It was finally fixed in March of this year.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Dave Shellman
wrote:
> **
> I seem to remem
ST.ORG"
Subject: Re: ARS Wikipedia page
**
Without saying anything that I shouldn't say, the edit in question was not
malicious, was not nefarious, and was made in an effort to streamline marketing
stuff for things that BMC sells.Remedy's not gone, not going away, and is
stil
I seem to remember a couple of guys making a few edits on Wikipedia late
one night at WWRUG in San Jose after consumption of beverages.
Someone needed screen captures for a presentation the next day.
Dave
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:30 PM Jason Miller
wrote:
> **
> I noticed the edit said they
I think we can probably assume this is just inline with the decision way
back when to not market the ARSystem by itself.
Greatest mistake they ever made (IMHO). BMC has turned Remedy ITSM into
bloat ware. One of the many reasons so many organizations are making the
jump to SNow.
I still say ARS
Without saying anything that I shouldn't say, the edit in question was not
malicious, was not nefarious, and was made in an effort to streamline
marketing stuff for things that BMC sells.Remedy's not gone, not going
away, and is still available for purchase as both a stand alone development
pla
I noticed the edit said they were done by a profile that indicated it was a
BMC employee but I figured that was fake info. WOW! Let's see where the
wild ride takes us now...
Of course we will probably be left to speculate and come up with our own
theories for the foreseeable future; which is alway
InterestingI just contacted someone internal to BMC and he is the
person that made the edits, per instructions of someone at
BMCapparently part of a 'revamp' effortI guess we'll need to see
what ends up coming out of it.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Warren R. Baltimore II <
wa
It's a BMC employee making the edits
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:03 PM, LJ LongWing wrote:
> **
> Don't you just love wiki's...able to be edited by anyone...
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Jason Miller
> wrote:
>
>> **
>> Either Wikipedia knows something we don't, that AR System is no
Don't you just love wiki's...able to be edited by anyone...
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Jason Miller
wrote:
> **
> Either Wikipedia knows something we don't, that AR System is no longer
> being sold, or this is a reflection of BMC's "Remedy is only a means to
> ITSM" approach for many years
I noticed that on the Mid-Tier page last week, actually!
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jason Miller
Sent: August-14-17 11:16 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ARS Wikipedia page
**
Either Wikipedia knows something we don't,
Either Wikipedia knows something we don't, that AR System is no longer
being sold, or this is a reflection of BMC's "Remedy is only a means to
ITSM" approach for many years. I guess there is one other option, the ARS
article was submitted for deletion by a SNOW employee.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w
19 matches
Mail list logo
