Thanks Carey, Just what I needed for Management :)
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carey Matthew Black
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 5:48 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Looking for feedback
name condition Matt described.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tanner, Doug
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 5:33 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on SourceSafe
Thanks Carey, Just
Hi all,
One of my teammates is investigating and testing SourceSafe. For any of
you who have used or are using this product, we would greatly appreciate
any feedback you can offer on your experiences with this product that
might help in our decision-making process.
TIA!
Jenni Wacholz
Remedy
Jenni,
My two cents...
* Visual SourceSafe (VSS) is very lacking as a Source Control system.
* However, it is easy to get setup and running with the existing ARS
integration to MS SC API.
* You likely will find the details of how VSS works to be
disappointing from a technical implementation
:15 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on SourceSafe
Jenni,
My two cents...
* Visual SourceSafe (VSS) is very lacking as a Source Control system.
* However, it is easy to get setup and running with the existing ARS
integration to MS SC API.
* You likely will find
: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 10:15 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on SourceSafe
Jenni,
My two cents...
* Visual SourceSafe (VSS) is very lacking as a Source Control system.
* However, it is easy to get setup and running with the existing ARS
integration to MS SC API
Matthew Black
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 11:15 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on SourceSafe
Jenni,
My two cents...
* Visual SourceSafe (VSS) is very lacking as a Source Control system.
* However, it is easy to get setup and running with the existing ARS
integration
: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:25 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on SourceSafe
Not to mention that every time you modify an object you must first check
it out, watch the admin tool thrash, modify, save, watch the admin tool
thrash.
Creation requires the checkbox of 'add
I notice a big difference in performance when I am logged into my
server via a VPN connection trying to check something in or out
versus doing the same action when on the Local Area Network. If I
had to guess, I would blame the paltry 384kbps upload speeds that my
local ISP throttles my
:06 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on SourceSafe
**
I notice a big difference in performance when I am logged into my server
via a VPN connection trying to check something in or out versus doing
the same action when on the Local Area Network. If I had to guess, I
Doug,
Actually as far as I know (or last I checked) ClearCase has so serious
of flaws in how it works with ARS that I would call it unusable. There
are workarounds to most of the issues but it is so buggy to
impractical in my opinion. You have to have your objects names overly
restricted due to
Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Baltimore
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 3:57 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on SourceSafe
**
Simply put Jenni,
VSS is my Worst Enemy and my Best Friend. It's a pain to use, the way
Simply put Jenni,
VSS is my Worst Enemy and my Best Friend. It's a pain to use, the way
Remedy plugs into it leaves much to be desired, BUT, the first time you
Screw Up (not that I've ever done that!), your awful glad it's there.
Warren
On 6/5/07, Carey Matthew Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
