Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-06 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 9:40 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6) Peter - is it OK to create another record in the Approval Process Configuration? Thanks. On 3/5/08, Lammey, Peter A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &g

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-06 Thread T. Dee
chnical Services & Applications Management > 860-766-4761 > > -Original Message- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:14 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-05 Thread T. Dee
ystem discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:14 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6) > > Are you talking about the "Approval Process Configuration&

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-05 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management 860-766-4761 -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:14 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Question: Change Status

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-05 Thread Roger Justice
estion: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6) Are you talking about the "Approval Process Configuration"? I tried to create a new record, but got a SQL error. On 3/5/08, Roger Justice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** If you want to skip steps as you suggested you will have to h

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-05 Thread T. Dee
meet the criteria you want to use that > allows the Change to go from RFC to Scheduled on self approval. > > > -Original Message- > From: T. Dee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Sent: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 7:51 am > Subject: Re: Question: Change Status

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-05 Thread Roger Justice
G Sent: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 7:51 am Subject: Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6) I have the Approvals for certain Change Types setup, however, don't have any Approvals for the Change Types that do not require approval. Do you still have to setup Approvals for Change Types that do

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-05 Thread T. Dee
t; ** You will need to set up aan approval process that will allow this to > occur with a qualification such as Timing = no impact. > > > > -Original Message- > From: T. Dee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Sent: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 5:08 pm > Subje

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-04 Thread Roger Justice
You will need to set up aan approval process that will allow this to occur with a qualification such as Timing = no impact. -Original Message- From: T. Dee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 5:08 pm Subject: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (p

Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-04 Thread T. Dee
I am have setup certain "Change Types" to require Approvals - this works fine. I have setup other "Change Types" NOT to require Approvals - this works fine. The problem I am having is that for "Change Types" that do NOT require Approvals are force to go through every Status. The system will not