Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1

2008-01-15 Thread Kern, Robert SBA
om: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Carter Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 3:21 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1 ** What is the problem you found with Migrator and has it been confirmed? We need

Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1

2008-01-15 Thread Craig Carter
: Monday, January 14, 2008 9:36 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1 Hello Andy, we are currently running on 6.3 and building a new 7.1 system. At the moment we just move data and are not really testing, so can't give you any feedback on testing re

Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1

2008-01-14 Thread Sokol, Brian
I kind of guessed that was the case (: From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:22 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1 ** Sorry

Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1

2008-01-14 Thread Naveen Kaushik
ist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1 I also hate having the server info removed from the Admin console. Forcing me to go through the User tool is not helping me at all. BMC if you are listening please put it back in the Admin tool where it belongs. -Original Message---

Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1

2008-01-14 Thread Rick Cook
uest System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sanders > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:17 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1 > > Hi Andy > > My own opinion is that 7.1 is a good release and

Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1

2008-01-14 Thread Sokol, Brian
) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sanders Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:17 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1 Hi Andy My own opinion is that 7.1 is a good release and so far I have had no problems in production. Running on Windows/MS SQL. The main

Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1

2008-01-14 Thread David Sanders
] web http://www.westoverconsulting.co.uk -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mayfield, Andy L. Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 4:09 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1 We are

Re: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1

2008-01-14 Thread Kern, Robert SBA
ntinental AG or its subsidiaries. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mayfield, Andy L. Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:09 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1 We are currently run

To be, or not to be? ARS Ver. 7.1

2008-01-14 Thread Mayfield, Andy L.
We are currently running ARS 7.0.01 and I wanted to get some opinions on 7.1. We are considering upgrading, but I wanted to see what the communities thoughts were on the state of the release. Just looking for people's personal opinions on whether they would upgrade at this time, or if there are p