[Artemis-users] Artemis and multiple (interactive) annotation tracks

2012-04-11 Thread Bossers, Alex
Hi I am playing around again with multiple annotation "tracks" in Artemis latest version locally... I managed to get BLAST results in the annotation as well as other EMBL FT. I wondered is it possible to get for let's say a limited BLAST to 4 matches each entry, to display all those 4 as featur

Re: [Artemis-users] Artemis and multiple (interactive) annotation tracks

2012-04-11 Thread Tim Carver
Hi Alex I am not sure of the best way to limit the number of hits to an ORF but you may be interested in a new view which is in development at the moment in Artemis. It displays overlapped features in a 'Feature Stack View'. Currently this is in the development version of Artemis, http://www.sange

Re: [Artemis-users] Artemis and multiple (interactive) annotation tracks

2012-04-11 Thread Bossers, Alex
Tim, thanks for the rapid reply! I will have a look at the dev version. Sounds interesting. Regarding the blast tracks. What I do is I generate ORFs using gmHMM or prodigal... and blast those in one go limiting 4 hits each. I than postprocess these files into embl annotation files using the ORF p

Re: [Artemis-users] Artemis and multiple (interactive) annotation tracks

2012-04-12 Thread Bossers, Alex
Tim, which FeaTure key would be best to use when wanting hyperlinked db refs? Is there some convention? /db_xref="GI:somenumber"? Alex Van: Bossers, Alex Verzonden: woensdag 11 april 2012 22:31 To: Tim Carver; artemis-users@sanger.ac.uk Onderwerp: RE: Ar

Re: [Artemis-users] Artemis and multiple (interactive) annotation tracks

2012-04-13 Thread Tim Carver
Hi Alex You can use db_xref. However Artemis should recognise hyperlinks in any qualifier e.g. /note. Cheers Tim On 4/12/12 9:15 PM, "Bossers, Alex" wrote: > Tim, > > which FeaTure key would be best to use when wanting hyperlinked db refs? Is > there some convention? > /db_xref="GI:somenumber

Re: [Artemis-users] Artemis and multiple (interactive) annotation tracks

2012-04-13 Thread Tim Carver
Hi Alex No that isn't the intended behaviour. This view is still in development so thank you for the feedback. I have changed the code so that all frame line features (not just CDS features) should now be separated out. So you should hopefully then see your 4 BLASTCDS features. This is now availab