Jerry... you have dirt on your face.
At 11:41 PM -0500 2/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stopped by AP City Hall today after what was talked about last night at the
council meeting.
1. Why would the city officials even consider selling of some of it's park
land.
Does the state have any safe
Apoojo is right Jerry. We have a representative form of Democracy
in America, not a pure form. It's worked pretty well for 225 years.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, apoojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, gtscarano212@ wrote:
I stopped by AP City Hall today
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Apoojo is right Jerry. We have a representative form of Democracy
in America, not a pure form. It's worked pretty well for 225
years.
I agree with Tommy and the others that we cannot vote on every
issue, that would
The issue of having the negotiations behind closed doors is
Ludicrous. There is no rational or strategic reason for closing the
negotiations. We have a right to know what is going on. The signal
is loud and clear that it is the governing body's city and not ours.
While their attitude towards the
I understand everyone's desire for the negotiations to be in public,
and there is a part of the me that would love to watch too.
There is another side of the argument here. The nature of
negotiations are such that it will lend itself to easy
misinterpretation by someone watching, most notably
Anyone remember the old Cushman's the cops used to ride in? The
seemed pretty economical. So is a motorcycle and we used to have that
too.
I know the argument is that they can't handle a high speed chase, but
how many of those do we really have? They are a mighty small
percentage compared
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There good for giving out tickets, for the the boardwalk and downtown
DPW crew but not much more. Jimmy Cooke used to drive one it used to
lean to the left.
Anyone remember the old Cushman's the cops used to ride in?
I think everyone's point is someone should be a bit mindful of the
spending - not just rubber stamping everything. A few grand/month adds
up to quite a few kickballs.
What piece of land on Memorial are you talking about- the NJ transit
piece?
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group
I think you forget, negotiations ended when the deal was signed by both
parties, thus creating a valid contract. As you say, was blessed by
christie.
If no subdevlopers what to work with you, as the MASTER developer, then
they (Partners) need to pick up the phone and start their own
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I understand everyone's desire for the negotiations to be in
public,
and there is a part of the me that would love to watch too.
If not watch it then at least have reports of what has been proposed
by city and the
Negotiations are a psychological chess match. You don't just walk in
and lay what you want on the table. Nobody accepts a first offer. You
practically hide what you want and ask for a great deal more and a
great deal other than what you want. You let the adversary peel off
a bunch of
Things you should be aware of...
STATEWIDE MEETING PLANNED.
Just a reminder that Tomorrow those interested in fighting against eminent
domain for private gain (EDA - Eminent Domain Abuse) are encourage to attend a
meeting of like minded people at Princeton University.
For info and
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody accepts a first offer.
There are no universals; a seller who knows the value of his
property,
is motivated to sell and/or understands clearly and accepts the
rational of an offer will often accept a first
I agree with you're post here, when you have two parties trying to
get to the same end, ie the property owner wants to sell and the buyer
wants to buy. They have the same goal, the only issue is price. Those
are the easy ones. I think that parts of the Beachfront negotiations,
unfortunately,
BB,
I'm confused. Let's say a farmer in Marlboro wants to monetize his
apple orchard to cover his estate taxes for his children. How does
selling it to a developer to build 5,000 sq ft McMansions benefit a
younger family trying to buy their first home?
One of my childhood friends is a
funny thing about age restricted communities - they really do not meet
COAH guidelines. They are no longer affordable at over 300k per.
It's an avenue for developers to squeeze a few more units in per acre
and/or build cheaper.
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go
Interesting negotiation today that we are involved in. A $13m deal.
A national developer we approached to flip a property to. The
seller, a foreign investor, the buyer for the developer, by
coincindence, from the same country, same last name.
Buyer made offer.
Seller politely laughed.
I said
I've been juxtaposing the issue of affordable homes, particularly for
young families, against the issue of open space legislation. Right
now open space initiatives have no natural predator. Now land is
finite, so when you take so much off the market, you drive up the
price of what is left. Right
18 matches
Mail list logo
