[AsburyPark] Re: Here they go again

2006-02-26 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The City came to far the last four years, you weren't here you don't > know how it was before. All the storys in the world that you heard > can't replace living it. We the long time residents don't want to > relive it

[AsburyPark] Re: Here they go again

2006-02-26 Thread oakdorf
>>>Not to let it play out would be a major mistake. > > Time to stop playing and paying and performing the contract that was signed and agreed to. With no-risk commercial loans going at 7% plus, the w-front can't be tied up. Any new businesses/construction money will be hit even harder on

[AsburyPark] Re: Here they go again

2006-02-26 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The City came to far the last four years, you weren't here you don't know how it was before. All the storys in the world that you heard can't replace living it. We the long time residents don't want to relive it we can

[AsburyPark] Re: Here they go again

2006-02-26 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > It was the right decision for the city.If the plan was overturned > this city would be in big trouble. Even tough it wouldn't effect the > fast track projects it would effect everything else. Including the > Pavilion

[AsburyPark] Re: Here they go again

2006-02-25 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" wrote: > > It was the right decision for the city.If the plan was overturned this city would be in big trouble. Even tough it wouldn't effect the fast track projects it would ef

[AsburyPark] Re: Here they go again

2006-02-25 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I here that Gifford and the gang appealed thier last lost in court to > the NJ Supreme Court. Waste of more time and money. > If I was a betting man I would bet that the Supreme Court doesn't even > hear it. Any takers. >