Perhaps a Facebook group could help?
If change is a possibility, I think the city would need to see how many people
actually care
about this. A few of us won't make a difference, but a few hundred might.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Jack Pitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a Facebook group could help?
If change is a possibility, I think the city would need to see how
many people actually care
about this. A few of us won't make a difference, but a few hundred
might.
I have to agree with that - I just went through another 50 or so
posts with no meat on them.
What is it with the members of this group - love to divert things
away from the issues you all face - and they are serious from what I
can tell.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj [EMAIL
Newbie you don't think the relationship between gay and straight
people in Asbury Park is an important topic with meat on it?
They just held a symposium on the subject at Monmouth College which
was covered in the Press.
Not important for us though?
Well excuse me for discussing an issue you
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newbie you don't think the relationship between gay and straight
people in Asbury Park is an important topic with meat on it?
They just held a symposium on the subject at Monmouth College which
was covered in the
The topic of gays and straights accomodating one another is an Asbury
Park topic, because The List excludes stright people.
Naturally a national issue along the same lines is going to spark a
little debate about how Asbury Parkers handles the same issue locally.
It may not be an issue that
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The topic of gays and straights accomodating one another is an Asbury
Park topic, because The List excludes stright people.
I bought up the topic:
1. since ap is gay friendly
2. since there are intelligent people on
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
READ the link to the Pennslvania PERS and their decision to invest
$125m in the MM Retail
Enhancement Fund.
My read is that it was a blind investment and if not used , does
it have to be returned?
OK, There. AP
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
didn't say it HAD to be returned, but IS there that possibility?
This is the Penn Retirement Systems summary of their decision to
invest in the MM Retail Enhancement Fund.
Guys,
Keep in mind that 18% IRR is on a levered basis. The unlevered
return is less than that. Also putting up 16% of the capital from
insiders is a healthy chunk of money. This does not seem like an
outrageous set of parameters.
Dan S
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL
Also, BlackRock Realty and the Harvard Endowment are two of the most
sophisticated alternative investment investors in the world. The
fact that they are partnered with these types of people is a plus
for sure because Harvard does tremendous due diligence.
--- In
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dsher4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, BlackRock Realty and the Harvard Endowment are two of the most
sophisticated alternative investment investors in the world.
And Blackrock was the darling of the street. But like the rest of the
now public co's (and
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dsher4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
Keep in mind that 18% IRR is on a levered basis. The unlevered
return is less than that. Also putting up 16% of the capital from
insiders is a healthy chunk of money. This does not seem like an
outrageous set
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dsher4 dsher4@ wrote:
Also, BlackRock Realty and the Harvard Endowment are two of the most
sophisticated alternative investment investors in the world.
And Blackrock was the darling
This is the quote from the piece The Fund will see 350 million of
equity capital commitments and target a gross internal rate of
return of 18% with leverage representing n more than 70% of total
portfolio cost. So leverage was used.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL
Be careful using stock prices to talk about the strenght or lack
thereoff of a company. In a bear market most stocks get hit very
hard. Cisco is one of the worlds most dominant companies, has a huge
cash balance and nothing to do with CDO's mortgages etc, and has
corrected from 34 to 14.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dsher4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the quote from the piece The Fund will see 350 million of
equity capital commitments and target a gross internal rate of
return of 18% with leverage representing n more than 70% of total
portfolio cost. So leverage
I guess the real question for all of us is whether they have further
capital to put to work and if the AP investment was done by MM for
MM or through one of their other investment vehicles. Another
thought, perhaps Gary was saying that MM put up the 60 million in
cash for the fund using no
I appreciate the high finance experience of those discussing the MM
funding sources.
However, could someone put it in more locally relevant terms? Is it
possible to determine in reality how much MM or APartners for that
matter has invested in Asbury Park?
Also what has been the net change in
--- so what do we have a BUY on CSCO and BLK for long term?
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
* To change settings online
We own CSCO not BLK and i was more just making a point
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- so what do we have a BUY on CSCO and BLK for long term?
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate the high finance experience of those discussing the MM
funding sources.
However, could someone put it in more locally relevant terms? Is it
possible to determine in reality how much MM or APartners for
22 matches
Mail list logo
