Rev Kev: I have reviewed your work below, and note that every
assumption you make is for votes to go away from the incumbants.
You have no way of knowing where votes from some of those candidates
would have gone if they didn't run.
I dig you Rev Kev but there is no scientific usefulness to
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Joe D'Andrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My analysis of your analysis: crap. Leave the numbers to JJ... stick
to the god stuff, rev. ~Joe
Come on Joey D, play nice, after all you won! What's crap? I think rev
kev said it plainly, there were more votes against
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Joe D'Andrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was only his second sentence. If that's the second sentence it
makes the rest of the 10 paragraph analysis crap.
~joe
Well I will give you that the speculation of the votes being paid for
is just that and not
Joe:
If you doubt that votes are bought for cash, than you are nieve.
It happens everywhere.
However, your right I should not be remiss as a Man of God...
and in that vain...
allow me to simply say; God forgive us all for what we do each and
every day, all of us.
Yahoo! Groups Links
Being gay is not what troubles me.
It's being corrupt that troubles me...
Again..
Christ died for sinners (the corrupt) - and I am just as needy of His
Grace as the next man.
and more facts are pouring in as we speak...
those that are employed through the per diem work program in asbury
At 2:10 AM + 5/13/05, dfsavgny wrote:
Well I will give you that the speculation of the votes being paid for
is just that and not appropriate, but the other analysis was okay.
About the other post about the vote buying with the JOBS person from
Long Branch. What is upsetting you abouthis,
Are you familar with the law of general statistics associated with
voter opposition to incumbents...
They generally vote for anyone who runs against them.
In so noting, every vote would have gone to the challengers in the
trimmed ballot. (10 only names)
The interesting downside to that
At 2:18 AM + 5/13/05, noblarneyzone wrote:
Being gay is not what troubles me.
It's being corrupt that troubles me...
Again..
Christ died for sinners (the corrupt) - and I am just as needy of His
Grace as the next man.
and more facts are pouring in as we speak...
those that are employed
Oh the gay long branch thing... why would anyone have to leave
long branch because they're gay? Makes me think RevKev has some
personal axe to grind throwing that one in.
I never said that was the reason he left Long Branch.
Unfortunately your are looking more closely at the Gay thing, and
You can't use a general law of statistics as an indisputable fact,
Rev. You are no more certain that a vote for Murray, or Singh, or
Otes or Anderson would not have gone to Sanders, etc. than I am
certain it would have. There is no way of knowing, and worse yet no
fact from which to draw an
, 2005 10:47 PM
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: My Analysis of Asbury Election
Oh the gay long branch thing... why would anyone have to leave
long branch because they're gay? Makes me think RevKev has some
personal axe to grind throwing that one in.
I never said
Analysis is speculation, thats a given.
However I am not new at these things.
Its not scientific, never said it was.
I am a theologian, and a professional Bloviator.
www.electricnews.com
However, there is a way to test this theory.
Cote got 200 votes. You canvas those 200 people and ask
However I am not new at these things.
Would it matter if I were new to these things? Would it matter if I
were more experienced than you to these things? I say no to both.
Numbers are numbers, and neither of us have them. The difference is
I'm not supplying assumed ones - you are.
ButI
A: Religion, Politics, Sex
Q: What are three things you should never discuss in polite company?
Seems you guys covered all three in a single post!
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
* To unsubscribe from this
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, jerseyjohn99 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A: Religion, Politics, Sex
Q: What are three things you should never discuss in polite company?
Seems you guys covered all three in a single post!
and I would add...
we did it in a polite manner.
Peace unto all and
15 matches
Mail list logo
